Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Torture "widespread"


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Torture "widespread" Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/3/2006 8:08:57 PM   
MsMacComb


Posts: 808
Joined: 3/30/2005
From: My Mothers womb.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DelightMachine
Amnesty International has been biased against the United States for some time. As a left-wing organization, it's been especially biased during the Bush administration and during the War on Terror. So it's hard to trust this organization when they talk about Guantanamo or, frankly, anything else regarding the United States.
When the United States, United Kingdom and others were preparing to invade Iraq and during the war, and now after, I've heard Amnesty International went soft on Iraqi atrocities and exaggerated United States actions, calling many questionable things "violations of human rights." This is not to say that AI didn't criticize Iraq for many of its human rights violations previously -- the organization has taken some steps to be fair, just not nearly enough.
 

This is slightly off-topic but,,, As the US is one of (or the) largest contributor in financial aid to other countries we will be under heavier scrutiny than many others. In a kind of oblique way (or directly) some of what we do can actually contribute to many of the horrors and oppressive regimes around the world. For instance, BushCo's abstinence agenda is tied directly to aid. If you want our money you must preach/educate abstinence (not condoms), period, for some (and only some) countries. So the result is more people get AIDs, more babies are without parents, more misery, less education and less money that could have gone to encouraging other programs or elections for a regime change is now wasted. So the same sadistic dictator or warlords stay in power and keep right on torturing people.
One could also state that as the supposed most "evolved" and educated country we should know better. The older child should know better than the younger child as he is older and smarter (just ask mom, lol). In that regard we are "older" and DO know better. The fact that BushCo runs around hiding all of this proves they know its illegal (and by some of their own statements) and that they do know better. So AI holding them/us to a higher standard is maybe not so much partisian politics but rather just the simple notion that as the "leader" of the free world, we know better and shouldnt be doing it. Look, its not legal under our constitution nor is it legal under the UN charter. So while some could say that some thord world dictator may not "know better" we being the driving force in so many ways have no such excuse.

_____________________________

Not looking for anyone for anything, any time.

(in reply to DelightMachine)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/3/2006 8:39:19 PM   
MsMacComb


Posts: 808
Joined: 3/30/2005
From: My Mothers womb.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DelightMachine

Prove it. Cite a credible source for that figure. It's an exaggeration to say we killed 100,000. If you're going to compare numbers, you'll also have to take into account the number of people Saddam would have continued to kill over the past for years and into the future, since we'd tried everything else to get him out of power and hadn't been able to do so, and had no prospect of getting him out of power in any other way.

That's an anti-American, biased description of our past history. Our use of atomic weapons in World War II probably saved lives, and that was the purpose of using them. Do you dispute that? If so, please show why we didn't actually save more lives and/or show that saving lives was not the purpose of using them. Remember, you're saying we're the equivalent of other human rights abusers. Were they trying to save lives too? Which ones that we've mentioned in this thread were ultimately trying to save more lives?

Holocaust: 8 million dead.
Stalin's Soviet Union: even more dead
Mass killings in Cambodia and China (in little Cambodia more than a million dead, in China many millions).
So are you serious about that claim or do you want to take it back? If serious, please back up that statement.

Really? Care to back that one up too? These reports of U.S. abuses are in our daily newspapers. Was that the situation in the Soviet Union? Is it the situation in China today? Are you serious? If so, please show how we're worse than any other country.
If you're so concerned about poor, tortured people, you wouldn't brush aside torture committed by Saddam, as you did in a previous post.

Some details matter. Context matters. If you don't take into account the fact that the United States in the past prevented far more human rights violations from taking place (than any that you cite), and in the current war on terror we're fighting thoroughly evil regimes that have some of the worst human rights records in the world today, then you're creating a cartoon version of reality.  
  

http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/20352 
Without my going and counting bodies this is one source. About 2 years ago a group of international doctors stated the same thing. Seeing as how BushCo has lied about every single thing he's stateed since getting into office (prove me wrong on any major issue) anyone that believes his sources is being naive. Iraqbodycount.com freely admits that the numbers they use are not anything other than what was reported via morgues. Many Muslims beleive that the body should go into the ground immediatly, many have no money for professional funerals and services so they plant them themselves.
News flash, a 500 pound laser guided bomb doesnt just "Bonk" Mr. Terrorist on the head. It blows up a house or building, and the one next door, and butane tanks, and gas lines catch on fire. During "shock and awe" they didnt sift through the debris like we did on 9/11 from WTC. They used bulldozers to cart away the rubble, with bodies mixed in.

Prove how many lives we saved in WWII by using nukes.

There is this notion that after previous wars we evolved (humanity). When I said we are setting a new standard I meant "again" for the future. Only a moron would go back thousands of years comparing your sadistic president to cavemen.
And again, one would think you would been able to grasp that I was referring to countries other than 3rd world as far as media. No one counts/counted the rags published daily by the likes of Hitler, Mussolini, Kim Jong-il etc. Must I explain every little thing to you?  There exists in conversation things known as "concepts, ideas, examples" which most people can grasp in the larger sense without wanting proof of every single detail or comparing to the "media" in communist countries.

Prove that the US prevented more human rights abuses in the past than anyone else.
Prove that in the war on terror we are fighting horrible regimes. The war on terror is with Al-Quida who is not really a regime at this moment, nor has ever had a country.
Prove that there were 8 million deaths during the Holocaust.
Prove that my comments are anti-american.
As you said, some details matter. Context matters. Stop rewriting history and PROVE your claims.




_____________________________

Not looking for anyone for anything, any time.

(in reply to DelightMachine)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/3/2006 8:47:25 PM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
Good to see you back down from saying we're worse human rights violators in the second half of your post.

To compare the administration's policy against promoting condoms to torture, organized rape and organized mass killings is still off-base, though. For one thing, promoting condoms has its own problems in preventing AIDS -- the condoms don't always work and people who get used to having multiple sex partners in these countries may not always use the condoms.

For another, I strongly suspect that the real result of the administration's policy is that one anti-AIDS program in a poor country will have a no-condom policy and get U.S. support and another anti-AIDS program in the same country will have condoms and get support from other countries and other sources. I seriously doubt many people die of AIDS as a result of the U.S. policy. My mind is open to new information on that.

You can't really compare that roundabout possibility of dying from AIDS because the U.S. didn't give out condoms to organized campaigns and government policies to violate human rights, torture, rape and kill. The second way is obviously worse morally and more effective in destroying lives.

_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to MsMacComb)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/3/2006 8:52:35 PM   
MsMacComb


Posts: 808
Joined: 3/30/2005
From: My Mothers womb.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DelightMachine

Good to see you back down from saying we're worse human rights violators in the second half of your post.
 

Remind me, where did I say this? Short term memory and all that.

_____________________________

Not looking for anyone for anything, any time.

(in reply to DelightMachine)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/3/2006 10:00:03 PM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
I can't respond to everything in your post, partly because it's late, but I can respond to a few things pretty easily right now: The 100,000-deaths figure has been controversial ever since it was put out. It was one study done by extrapolating from a sample of people asked if they knew of deaths, and then how many deaths. Personally, I think the study is ridiculous, but I can't cite all the reasons immediately.
quote:

ORIGINAL: MsMacComb
http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/20352 
Without my going and counting bodies this is one source. About 2 years ago a group of international doctors stated the same thing. Seeing as how BushCo has lied about every single thing he's stateed since getting into office (prove me wrong on any major issue) anyone that believes his sources is being naive. Iraqbodycount.com freely admits that the numbers they use are not anything other than what was reported via morgues. Many Muslims beleive that the body should go into the ground immediatly, many have no money for professional funerals and services so they plant them themselves.


quote:

Prove how many lives we saved in WWII by using nukes.

It's standard history. Look anywhere beyond left-wing sources and you'll find it's the consensus view. American deaths alone were estimated at nearly a million and, surprise surprise, you don't just BONK Mr. Japanese Terrorist State in the head without killing many civilians with other types of bombs. 

Wikipedia has an interesting article on it. Here's part of it (boldface added):
quote:

A study done for Secretary of War Henry Stimson's staff by William Shockley estimated that conquering Japan would cost 1.7–4 million American casualties, including 400,000–800,000 fatalities, and five to ten million Japanese fatalities. [SNIP] ...

Nearly 500,000 Purple Heart medals were manufactured in anticipation of the casualties resulting from the invasion of Japan. As of 2005, all the American military casualties of the following sixty years—including the Korean and Vietnam Wars—have not exhausted that stockpile.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Downfall#Estimated_casualties_for_Downfall


quote:

And again, one would think you would been able to grasp that I was referring to countries other than 3rd world as far as media. No one counts/counted the rags published daily by the likes of Hitler, Mussolini, Kim Jong-il etc.

Except when you imply that the U.S. is as bad as or worse than any other regime. Sorry I wasn't able to read the reservations you have about that in your own mind. Perhaps if you'd actually put those caveats in your post my poor mind would have been able to grasp it.

You say "no one counts" these other regimes. But of course the posts in this very thread mention Arabs who think the U.S. has been as bad as Saddam and other posts on this thread have indicated that the U.S. has been perceived as being as bad as other, worse regimes. Some idiot or ignorant Europeans actually think that. Some idiot or ignorant Asians also think that. Some people posting on this thread seemed to think that. When Americans talk the same way, it reinforces that kind of thinking. Your loose talk reinforces it. 

quote:

Must I explain every little thing to you?  There exists in conversation things known as "concepts, ideas, examples" which most people can grasp in the larger sense without wanting proof of every single detail or comparing to the "media" in communist countries.

Must I explain every little thing to you? There exists in conversation a thing known as exaggeration. You were guilty of it.

quote:

Prove that the US prevented more human rights abuses in the past than anyone else.

Without us, Hitler's regime would either have been undefeated in World War II, leading to further killing on a scale of millions, or the Soviet Union would have dominated Europe, leading to the same thing. Without the United States, Imperial Japan would have been undefeated as well. Those were the deadliest, bloodiest regimes in world history with the possible exception of the regimes of the Mongol hordes about 800 years ago.

The United States has not promoted democracy and human rights in every single place and at all times around the world, but we've been more effective at it than any other country. By opposing the Soviet Union, for instance, we eventually forced its rulers to realize that they received no benefit from spending so much on their military. By showing the world that a free, capitalist country could give its citizens so many benefits, we provided an example that others followed. The people in countries behind the Iron Curtain constantly said they wanted to be "normal" countries. They defined normal by the example set by the United States and Europe and Japan, and it was the U.S. that supported Europe and Japan just after World War II, allowing them to be examples to others.  

quote:

Prove that in the war on terror we are fighting horrible regimes. The war on terror is with Al-Quida who is not really a regime at this moment, nor has ever had a country.

We are also fighting regimes that support terrorists, and those happen to be some of the worst in the world in terms of human rights violations. Afghanistan under the Taliban supported Al Qaeda. Iraq had proven ties to terrorists and Iran has ties to various terrorist groups -- it set up some in Lebanon, for instance. The problem of Islamofascist terrorism doesn't end if Al Qaeda ends, but it's greatly lessened if we stop some regimes from ending their support for terrorism. The War on Terrorism has always been about fighting both terrorists, their support groups and the regimes that support terrorists.

quote:

Prove that there were 8 million deaths during the Holocaust.

If you are so ignorant as to post on a public message board about American crimes compared to the rest of the world and not know about how many were killed in the Holocaust, then you have some work to do. Eight million is the standard (if rough) figure and you can look it up with any reputable source. Here is just one source, and it repeats what you'll find elsewhere:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust#Death_toll
quote:

Prove that my comments are anti-american.

When you ignore anything good about America and exaggerate the bad, you're obviously anti-American. You could disprove this by not ignoring the good and not exaggerating the bad.




_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to MsMacComb)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/3/2006 10:14:47 PM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MsMacComb

quote:

ORIGINAL: DelightMachine

Good to see you back down from saying we're worse human rights violators in the second half of your post.
 

Remind me, where did I say this? Short term memory and all that.


Well, you SEEM to back down when you say this:
quote:

One could also state that as the supposed most "evolved" and educated country we should know better. [SNIP} ... we are "older" and DO know better. The fact that BushCo runs around hiding all of this proves they know its illegal (and by some of their own statements) and that they do know better. So AI holding them/us to a higher standard is maybe not so much partisian politics but rather just the simple notion that as the "leader" of the free world, we know better and shouldnt be doing it. Look, its not legal under our constitution nor is it legal under the UN charter. So while some could say that some thord world dictator may not "know better" we being the driving force in so many ways have no such excuse.


You explicitly compared U.S. behavior to Saddam Hussein's regime here in Post #18:
quote:

I think that for many people the point is that Saddam is accused of killing 300,000 people over roughly 30 years. We have done one third of that in four years. We also are the ones that used Agent Orange and are the only country to use nukes plus God only knows what other types of chemical and/or biological weapons over the years. We know are setting a new standard for organized torture and repression of information. Killing innocent people, men women and children, using WMD on them, torturing them, well,,, does evaluating the details really matter? Just because the US does it in a "santized" manner with the push of a button from many miles away and then censors the media about those details, the photos etc doesnt make those poor people any less dead.
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=356347



_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to MsMacComb)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/3/2006 10:38:21 PM   
MsMacComb


Posts: 808
Joined: 3/30/2005
From: My Mothers womb.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DelightMachine
 

It must be amazing to be you. To be able to decide what is and isnt fact based on virtually nothing. To quote Wikipedia, lol (no controversy there). To imply by your writing that I must be "left wing", such a simple "catch all" reply for those that are all or none thinkers. As if there was nothing in the middle. To take comments made by others on this forum, and the attitude behind it and attribute it to me. To state as fact things I said, when asked for proof, to then state that thats what I "appeared" to have meant. To demand vigorously "proof" but then when asked to reciprocate to offer none, to quote "standard history (whatever the hell that is) and then to claim its past your bedtime so you can run off without providing the "proof" that is only conclusive to you based on the fact that its what you wish to believe and fits your agenda. Then to pull what every jackass on FOX, the neocons, Cheney etc pull by accusing others of being anti-american. But no, your just one of  a million other keyboard warriors. Theres a term for them "all talk and no cock". PROVE what you are claiming, stop claiming it or shut the hell up.  And dont fucking accuse me of being anti-american ever again!

< Message edited by MsMacComb -- 5/3/2006 11:03:34 PM >


_____________________________

Not looking for anyone for anything, any time.

(in reply to DelightMachine)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/3/2006 11:38:02 PM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MsMacComb
It must be amazing to be you.

Actually, it is.
quote:

To be able to decide what is and isnt fact based on virtually nothing.

Oh, I didn't give any reasons? I didn't cite any sources?
quote:

To quote Wikipedia, lol (no controversy there).

Oh, I DID cite someone -- but you don't like it. Well, do you disagree with what they said? Why? Cite your own sources. Those Wikipedia articles cited their sources. They didn't say anything I hadn't heard before from sources I already know are reliable. Your scoffing isn't exactly proof, by the way.
quote:

To imply by your writing that I must be "left wing", such a simple "catch all" reply for those that are all or none thinkers. As if there was nothing in the middle.

I didn't. I said you took on left-wing arguments. You did.
quote:

To take comments made by others on this forum, and the attitude behind it and attribute it to me.

I didn't.
quote:

To state as fact things I said, when asked for proof, to then state that thats what I "appeared" to have meant.

I can't help it if you can't write clearly. I reread what you wrote and I still think my interpretation of your cloudy language is the best. Feel free to restate exactly what you meant. 
quote:

To demand vigorously "proof" but then when asked to reciprocate to offer none,

None? It's obvious to whoever reads this that I offered some at this point, and it's also obvious it's late. Have you offered more proof yourself? I don't see it.
quote:

to quote "standard history (whatever the hell that is)

The consensus is as I stated it. Either show it's not the consensus or prove the consensus wrong.
quote:

and then to claim its past your bedtime so you can run off without providing the "proof"

You mean I'm not allowed to sleep or take a break when on these boards?
quote:

PROVE what you are claiming, stop claiming it or shut the hell up.
You mean you hold me to a higher standard than you hold yourself? Because you didn't exactly prove what you were claiming. If those Wikipedia articles are unreliable in your opinion, point to a better source. If you can show the reporting in those articles is false, do so. If you can't, quit yammering.
quote:

And dont fucking accuse me of being anti-american ever again!

I defined what I consider anti-American, and you fit the bill.

< Message edited by DelightMachine -- 5/3/2006 11:48:25 PM >


_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to MsMacComb)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/4/2006 12:13:20 AM   
NeedToUseYou


Posts: 2297
Joined: 12/24/2005
From: None of your business
Status: offline
You two should really hook up, all this energy really could be put to better use.



(in reply to DelightMachine)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/4/2006 12:51:48 AM   
MsMacComb


Posts: 808
Joined: 3/30/2005
From: My Mothers womb.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DelightMachine

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsMacComb
It must be amazing to be you.

Actually, it is.
Blah, blah, blah.
quote:

To be able to decide what is and isnt fact based on virtually nothing.

Oh, I didn't give any reasons? I didn't cite any sources?
Hack, gag cough.
quote:

To quote Wikipedia, lol (no controversy there).

Oh, I DID cite someone -- but you don't like it. Well, do you disagree with what they said? Why? Cite your own sources. Those Wikipedia articles cited their sources. They didn't say anything I hadn't heard before from sources I already know are reliable. Your scoffing isn't exactly proof, by the way.
Scoff, regurgitate.
quote:

To imply by your writing that I must be "left wing", such a simple "catch all" reply for those that are all or none thinkers. As if there was nothing in the middle.

I didn't. I said you took on left-wing arguments. You did.
Diarrhea of the mouth.
quote:

To take comments made by others on this forum, and the attitude behind it and attribute it to me.

I didn't.
Look, I can come up with a stupid ass one line answer to anything. Just like my hero "DeliteChiney"
quote:

To state as fact things I said, when asked for proof, to then state that thats what I "appeared" to have meant.

I can't help it if you can't write clearly. I reread what you wrote and I still think my interpretation of your cloudy language is the best. Feel free to restate exactly what you meant. 
Nah, it would be easier to explain it to a two year old.
quote:

To demand vigorously "proof" but then when asked to reciprocate to offer none,

None? It's obvious to whoever reads this that I offered some at this point, and it's also obvious it's late. Have you offered more proof yourself? I don't see it.
Proof? Like 180 proof? I'll get the glasses, you get the ice.
quote:

to quote "standard history (whatever the hell that is)

The consensus is as I stated it. Either show it's not the consensus or prove the consensus wrong.
Consensus. According to Fox News consensus Bush's poll numbers are 99% positive.
quote:

and then to claim its past your bedtime so you can run off without providing the "proof"

You mean I'm not allowed to sleep or take a break when on these boards?
Nope, not until you actually say something intelligent.
quote:

PROVE what you are claiming, stop claiming it or shut the hell up.
You mean you hold me to a higher standard than you hold yourself? Because you didn't exactly prove what you were claiming. If those Wikipedia articles are unreliable in your opinion, point to a better source. If you can show the reporting in those articles is false, do so. If you can't, quit yammering.
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/techpolicy/2005-12-05-wiki-rules_x.htm
Where theres one, theres more. Articles submitted by any moronic derelict readers. Perhaps you?
quote:

And dont fucking accuse me of being anti-american ever again!

I defined what I consider anti-American, and you fit the bill.
I consider you to be *possibly* part girl, part frog, part rock, part (well your little two inch part) whatever, and partially at least a portion of a part of blustering ego with no substance. Do you fit the bill? You must. As you decided I am anti-american (political activist, regular voter, former MP, tax payer (by the way, where DID you serve your country, what branch?)) then I must be correct also based on the same criteria. You know its really been a pleasure kicking your ass all over these boards. have a nice evening and have sweet dreams of me, lol.


_____________________________

Not looking for anyone for anything, any time.

(in reply to DelightMachine)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/4/2006 1:36:38 AM   
UtopianRanger


Posts: 3251
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NeedToUseYou

You two should really hook up, all this energy really could be put to better use.





Nah... I don't think it would work out  ; }

I love the ''fight'' in her, she reminds of Aakasha! HAR!


 - R


_____________________________

"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired."

-General George S. Patton


(in reply to NeedToUseYou)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/4/2006 1:50:10 AM   
MsMacComb


Posts: 808
Joined: 3/30/2005
From: My Mothers womb.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: UtopianRanger
I love the ''fight'' in her, she reminds of Aakasha! HAR!
- R


Damn you UT! And here we were getting along swimmingly before that comment, lol.

_____________________________

Not looking for anyone for anything, any time.

(in reply to UtopianRanger)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/4/2006 1:54:56 AM   
UtopianRanger


Posts: 3251
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MsMacComb

quote:

ORIGINAL: UtopianRanger
I love the ''fight'' in her, she reminds of Aakasha! HAR!
- R


Damn you UT! And here we were getting along swimmingly before that comment, lol.


That was a total compliment! I like women with juice! lol!


 - R


_____________________________

"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired."

-General George S. Patton


(in reply to MsMacComb)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/4/2006 2:11:04 AM   
wytchywoman


Posts: 510
Joined: 2/27/2006
From: Southeastern Michigan
Status: offline
There you are again, DelightMachine. Yes, indeed. Your are such a delight to all of us!

Thanks again for your dramatic display of absolute insensitvity to every other living human on earth. We need you to remind  the rest of us what morals really are.

By the way...did the psych team that has been working on you ever get your meds straightened out ?


_____________________________

Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind.
Ralph Waldo Emerson


(in reply to DelightMachine)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/4/2006 2:54:48 AM   
MsMacComb


Posts: 808
Joined: 3/30/2005
From: My Mothers womb.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wytchywoman
There you are again, DelightMachine. Yes, indeed. Your are such a delight to all of us!
Thanks again for your dramatic display of absolute insensitvity to every other living human on earth. We need you to remind  the rest of us what morals really are.
By the way...did the psych team that has been working on you ever get your meds straightened out ?
 

I actually think Delight is an ok guy. He's just trying to maintain his persona as a tough guy with an attitude. Often people will take the exact opposite approach or stance in any discussion, "just because".  I think that deep down beneath that hard ass faux exterior is an altruistic heart of gold. He just needs to be gradually weaned off of his FOX News addiction and reintroduced back into reality. That or he just needs a good old fashioned bare bottom spanking.

_____________________________

Not looking for anyone for anything, any time.

(in reply to wytchywoman)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/4/2006 6:00:19 AM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
.....i really ought to check these fora more often.
reading my original post i don't think it was entirely fair of me to make the statements i did without some form of clarification, and i thank the poster who reminded me of that.
My belief is that there is an historical bias in American foreign policy to tolerate torture of foreign nationals. Regimes in south america were supported and maintained purely because they werent communist. This single piece of dogma was allowed to take precedence over what those regimes actually did to people.
A more relevant to today example though may be the US's support of Israel as an ally, when Israel legalised torture within its own state against suspected palestinian terrorists. The word here is suspected.
From the pov of someone who does not know the oath of allegience and comes from a culture where there is no direct equivilant of 'unamerican', these actions combined with what your diplomats actually tell us just give an impression over time of a deeply hypocritical society. Abu ghraib has done nothing to damage the US's reputation, merely confirm it.

(in reply to MsMacComb)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/4/2006 5:26:12 PM   
MsMacComb


Posts: 808
Joined: 3/30/2005
From: My Mothers womb.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy
A more relevant to today example though may be the US's support of Israel as an ally, when Israel legalised torture within its own state against suspected palestinian terrorists. The word here is suspected.
  

Ahh, don't get me started on Israel, lol.

_____________________________

Not looking for anyone for anything, any time.

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/4/2006 6:08:57 PM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wytchywoman
There you are again, DelightMachine.

Yes, Dear.
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=343298
quote:

Yes, indeed. Your are such a delight to all of us!

Yes, Dear.
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=342905
quote:

Thanks again for your dramatic display of absolute insensitvity to every other living human on earth.

Yes, Dear.
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=341273
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=341375
quote:

We need you to remind  the rest of us what morals really are.

Yes, Dear.
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=343413
quote:

By the way... did the psych team that has been working on you ever get your meds straightened out ?

Dear, I've been told simply to agree with you about everything. The doctor's say that's best for you.
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=344396

< Message edited by DelightMachine -- 5/4/2006 6:10:04 PM >


_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to wytchywoman)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/4/2006 6:12:58 PM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NeedToUseYou
You two should really hook up, all this energy really could be put to better use.

Than's so much for the relationship advice, Need (and what have I ever done to you ...?), but I'm not too sure it would be either safe, sane or consensual for me.

_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to NeedToUseYou)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Torture "widespread" - 5/4/2006 6:16:02 PM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
Nice display of maturity.

_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to MsMacComb)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Torture "widespread" Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094