AAkasha -> RE: Analytical Chemistry (2/6/2011 11:56:49 AM)
|
I can have instant attraction to someone based on his looks (we all have our favorite "types') but once I am standing next to him talking, that attraction can vanish fairly quickly if there is no chemistry. By the same token, I can be in the presence of a man that I am not initially attracted to, but after getting to know him, I feel an attraction and the chemistry takes over. I think the most important thing a man (sub or not) can take away from the concept is chemistry is that it's important that he allow a woman to get to know him in order to establish chemistry (it's often not instant), and he has to practice patience, good hygiene, manners, tact, class, etc. I've been away from the 'single social scene' a long time, so I have no idea if this is a new thing (because of technology) or if it's a BDSM thing, but it seems like people don't go out and "socialize" any more. I am not talking about "going to munches," but I am talking about people in their formative social years - ie between the age of 15 and 25 or so, going out in groups and "hanging out," going to parties, in mixed company. This is where you learn to read cues, flirt, etc. My niece is 16, she's constantly doing what I was doing at that age - parties (no alcohol fueled parties, but kids her age getting together watching movies, swimming, going to the mall, whatever) - exposing herself and her peers to the opposite sex and learning to navigate the complicated road of "does he like me" and "do I like him?" and how you communicate interest, respond to interest, and establish chemistry. I think texting, the Internet and technology may have changed a lot of this for people, but you can't skip this stage of social learning and expect to know how to date effectively in your 30s - learning to talk to the opposite sex and read cues is so important. Do people just text each other instead? Akasha
|
|
|
|