Protected from Zombie Outbreak!

Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

joether -> Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 2:08:36 PM)
Trash Talking Republicans Yes, to fear the eventual zombie invasion, one has to have an actual brain. For these fools, that's the least of their problems. 'Liberalism' is an intolerant religion? And the President practices it? Where do these people come from? Does Fox News have a working Diminesional Transportor Device linked solely to the Land of Bizarro? Until they got to the point, of someone talking of Mr. Obama's religious beliefs, they could have been taken seriously in a real debate. If you notice the first speaker's facial expression when this comes up, he actually rolls his eyes as if to say "crap, the stupid majority is speaking now...." The clip this is taken from, was of Bill O'Reilly interviewing the President shortly before the Super Bowl (I think that's the time frame). From my observation, much of Bill's material was heavily 'Agenda Focused' rather then 'Good Journalism'. Some of Mr. O'Reilly's questions were good, but the majority of them were an effort to try to get the President to justify conservative paranoia/conspiracy theories. And the President intelligently side-stepped the baited questions. Funny that as the President was trying to explain something indepth, Mr. O'Reilly wanted to switch to another topic. I guess that implies his typical audience couldn't handle a real, intelligent conservation....

RapierFugue -> RE: Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 2:11:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: joether Trash Talking Republicans Oh FFS that's funny :)

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 2:17:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: joether Trash Talking Republicans 'Liberalism' is an intolerant religion? that as the President was trying to explain something indepth, Mr. O'Reilly wanted to switch to another topic. I guess that implies his typical audience couldn't handle a real, intelligent conservation.... Excellent analogy, Liberals believe in a benevolent "god" that will miraculously create money for them to redistribute, and are the most intolerant group of people Ive ever seen...this board is evidence of tht. what B O'R was doing was not letting Obama monopolize the conversation and kill time. He let Obama make his points and then made him move on. Its the only way to interview any POTUS and exactly the way he handled GWB interviews.

rulemylife -> RE: Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 2:24:30 PM)
I've never seen so many geeks assembled in one place in my life. And on a side note, do you think Sean Hannity has a toupee? That can't be real hair.

mnottertail -> RE: Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 2:25:10 PM)
excellent analogy, wilbur, and conservatives believe in sucking each other off in minneapolis airport bathrooms, and making the state of minnesota pay for their prosecution.

DomKen -> RE: Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 3:03:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy Its the only way to interview any POTUS and exactly the way he handled GWB interviews. ORLY? http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-national/a-comparison-of-o-reilly-s-obama-interview-with-an-interivew-of-bush-from-2006

RapierFugue -> RE: Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 3:07:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy Its the only way to interview any POTUS and exactly the way he handled GWB interviews. ORLY? http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-national/a-comparison-of-o-reilly-s-obama-interview-with-an-interivew-of-bush-from-2006 While not arguing either the maths or the conclusions, I would be a happier man if news outlets worldwide could find journos who knew the difference between "less" and "fewer". I mean, FFS - these people are supposed to be the pinnacle of current written endeavours.

mnottertail -> RE: Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 3:11:54 PM)
Well, the less of those asswipes like O'Rielly and co I see, the fewer times I have to puke.

RapierFugue -> RE: Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 3:14:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Well, the less of those asswipes like O'Rielly and co I see, the fewer times I have to puke. Give this man a job! strictly speaking (and I mean, really strictly speaking), you got it slightly wrong, but I'm letting it go as you still did better than a professional journo ;)

mnottertail -> RE: Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 3:16:19 PM)
but I had to have it slightly wrong in order to get the comedic timing.

RapierFugue -> RE: Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 3:18:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail but I had to have it slightly wrong in order to get the comedic timing. I realised that, and thus didn't mark you down (much) for it :)

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 5:06:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy Its the only way to interview any POTUS and exactly the way he handled GWB interviews. ORLY? http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-national/a-comparison-of-o-reilly-s-obama-interview-with-an-interivew-of-bush-from-2006 Yes, really. Id suggest you look at the Bush interviews yourself instead of relying on a biased blogger, but you have proven yourself to be just as intellectually dishonest numerous times.

DomKen -> RE: Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 5:10:14 PM)
I did look. O'Reilly did not interupt Bush as frequently and let his answers go on for longer. Subjectively the questions he asked were not nuetral and certainly were not as outright hostile as those he posed to Obama.

joether -> RE: Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 5:26:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: joether Trash Talking Republicans 'Liberalism' is an intolerant religion? that as the President was trying to explain something indepth, Mr. O'Reilly wanted to switch to another topic. I guess that implies his typical audience couldn't handle a real, intelligent conservation.... Excellent analogy, Liberals believe in a benevolent "god" that will miraculously create money for them to redistribute, and are the most intolerant group of people Ive ever seen...this board is evidence of tht. what B O'R was doing was not letting Obama monopolize the conversation and kill time. He let Obama make his points and then made him move on. Its the only way to interview any POTUS and exactly the way he handled GWB interviews. Really? The President stated 'Liberalism' is an intolerant religion? And you have PROOF and EVIDENCE of this, right? Course you dont! What you have is 'Fox News Reality'. In which you took my post, tried to hack it up, to state what you wanted it to state. THEN, past it off, as the original document, hoping no one, including the author, would notice your act of deceit. On top of that hack job, added in your own dialogue that unsurprisingly, is enhanced by the 'original' post. Geez willbeurdaddy....dishonest often? Just look at the original post of what you cut out.... quote: ...And the President practices it? Where do these people come from? Does Fox News have a working Diminesional Transportor Device linked solely to the Land of Bizarro? Until they got to the point, of someone talking of Mr. Obama's religious beliefs, they could have been taken seriously in a real debate. If you notice the first speaker's facial expression when this comes up, he actually rolls his eyes as if to say "crap, the stupid majority is speaking now...." The clip this is taken from, was of Bill O'Reilly interviewing the President shortly before the Super Bowl (I think that's the time frame). From my observation, much of Bill's material was heavily 'Agenda Focused' rather then 'Good Journalism'. Some of Mr. O'Reilly's questions were good, but the majority of them were an effort to try to get the President to justify conservative paranoia/conspiracy theories. And the President intelligently side-stepped the baited questions. Funny... ...to make your point. That is total dishonesty, willbeurdaddy. You should be ashamed of yourself. I believe its WELL WITHIN my right, to demand a good apology from you. Question is, are you mature enough to handle it?

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 5:30:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen I did look. O'Reilly did not interupt Bush as frequently and let his answers go on for longer. Subjectively the questions he asked were not nuetral and certainly were not as outright hostile as those he posed to Obama. I repeat: but you have proven yourself to be just as intellectually dishonest numerous times. And there is more than 1 interview with Bush, but don't bother watching. You're head is too far up Obama's ass to see daylight.

rulemylife -> RE: Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 5:41:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy Its the only way to interview any POTUS and exactly the way he handled GWB interviews. ORLY? http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-national/a-comparison-of-o-reilly-s-obama-interview-with-an-interivew-of-bush-from-2006 Yes, really. Id suggest you look at the Bush interviews yourself instead of relying on a biased blogger, but you have proven yourself to be just as intellectually dishonest numerous times. You mean the Bush interview that is linked to in DK's article that you apparently never bothered to look at?

Hippiekinkster -> RE: Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 5:50:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RapierFugue quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy Its the only way to interview any POTUS and exactly the way he handled GWB interviews. ORLY? http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-national/a-comparison-of-o-reilly-s-obama-interview-with-an-interivew-of-bush-from-2006 While not arguing either the maths or the conclusions, I would be a happier man if news outlets worldwide could find journos who knew the difference between "less" and "fewer". I mean, FFS - these people are supposed to be the pinnacle of current written endeavours. Yes, thank you. There also seem to be more and more people who think that "of" is part of a subjunctive compound verb phrase. And then we have Woolbur the etymologist, who studies the mangling of contractions: "You are head is too far..." Brilliant.

RapierFugue -> RE: Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 5:57:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster Yes, thank you. There also seem to be more and more people who think that "of" is part of a subjunctive compound verb phrase. There was nothing wrong with my use of "of" though, which is the main thing ;) And the next person using the phrase "off of" in my vicinity is going to get a boot up the hooter.

RapierFugue -> RE: Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 6:01:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster And then we have Woolbur the etymologist, who studies the mangling of contractions: "You are head is too far..." Brilliant. That's certainly one word for it. Not the one I would have chosen, mind.

Hippiekinkster -> RE: Protected from Zombie Outbreak! (2/11/2011 6:12:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RapierFugue quote: ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster And then we have Woolbur the etymologist, who studies the mangling of contractions: "You are head is too far..." Brilliant. That's certainly one word for it. Not the one I would have chosen, mind. Ah think Ah'm gettin the hang o that thar irony thing.

Page: [1] 2 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875