|
came4U -> RE: Spooky dreams (not about the Amish) (2/16/2011 7:43:15 AM)
|
Dreams can be less reliable of a future event if a person doesn't know how to interpret them. I'd suggest only writing down very few interesting, odd and key points, to see what happens and then if and when something of similarity occurs you know the pattern to look for.
I am more of a remote viewer (aka, any past, present or future events/locations) arrive when I am awake. It helps to talk to the person
for a few minutes--not knowing where they live, sex, name, etc. Disastrous events of magnitude/population come rarely in a flashing thought (ie: the Crash on the Hudston miracle was so odd, birds, plane crash, water) that I ignore/dismiss them as just frikn weird.
But, if you are interested, you can study 'Remote Viewing' itself as a livelihood or for recreation by Ingo Swann, the father of remote viewing (aka, the real man who stared at goats) who went on to be the leading force behind the CIA's 20 year long black budget (now public) program that they say is now 'unused'. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRj7sXEgZCA&feature=related
If you in another case want me to view you (free, of course) to see if I pick up anything, let me know. I tend to see future events on cue, or not at all, location, situational habitat, etc. I have been known to be wrong, but known to be right more.
The whole concept is possible naturally to everyone, if open to it and an interesting field of interest for anyone who is or isn't into believing in telepathy vs. the supernatural (in this case, I say supernatural as in the using the means of instruments of an occult of any form). I, personally, do not delve into the supernatural. Noting good can come of it-ever.
btw, if windchimes actually thought about it deeply, you are more than likely MORE intuitive than you gives herself credit for (if you were to document the little things that may 'seem' irrelevant at the time, more). Don't forget though, human reasoning gets in the buggered way and mistranslates what we perceive in dreams vs the thoughts and visions while awake). The 'gift' is trying to decipher the difference in the planned perception your own being/mind/soul is telling you, knowing what is relevant or not and that takes practice, patience and study of your own predictive-positive patterns. You are a pre-cog of the 'tangible' vs those who predict or presently see events of non-negotiable 'otherly' (perhaps it is only a personal gift) pre-cog. To test yourself would be to see if your ability would feel or foresee events that effect others. But, hell, no need. If that is what you get, it is still 99% more of what others receive, so your system works just fine. But, if you want to test yourself with practice, do study on it further.
and to the OP, Heretic.
your only problem is you think about the whole ideal too much, the anticipation of getting a 'viewing', the meaning of and looking for the realization in an end result. That in itself clouds the issue with the possibility of creating events out of the though of events via the subliminal dream-event. In other words, you THINK too much. Doing that, you likely miss 70% of any true and dire information necessary for every day events that are to unfold.
Aylee is not a skeptic, but a rational, yet passionate, compassionate observer--in which most of the population is. A 'debunker', on the other hand is directly obsessed with denying the existence of such premonitions/un-natural events because they are not into the whole issue because very few instances have been personal enough to believe, which is fine. Circumstances of 'seeing' are too far and few between that to some it will never be realized that they are a valuable resource for their own well-being and others.
|
|
|
|
