|
suffocationlove -> RE: Church Of Suffocation (3/2/2011 5:05:39 PM)
|
Not "teasing", per se. Layers of enclosure serve more to deliver a sensual echo than as a means of sensory deprivation, when employed properly. And survivors of abuse are not the only individuals to whom such a situation - veiled touch - would occur naturally. A large body of Muslim women, for example, have progressed from feelings of subjection based on mandatory Hijaab, to the eroticism of their encasement. Other cultures also have taboos that can be played with, while not necessarily broken.
I merely mentioned abuse because I have found that those who have been damaged enough not to allow themselves to be touched - or, even, to touch themselves, because being touched HURTS, find that, completely enclosed in latex, plastic, Zentai et cetera, that same touch becomes okay, and even becomes wonderful.
Too many here seem to be hung up on being masked meaning not being *seen*, and the implication (theirs, not mine) that being covered means being ignored.
It is true, I've known women who, as soon as they were masked, acted and felt completely and utterly LOST. And I have known women who have found freedom in not being seen naked. They allowed themselves to experience sensations and emotions they, through whatever programming they had been subjected to, had previously denied themselves.
And I shouldn't have to go into the sense of liberation some find in bondage and submission. Should I?
|
|
|
|
