Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 11:42:52 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse
Internal polls in Wisconsin fully support Scott Walker and the republicans. I was in Madison today having a guiness with 3 members of the state assembly. I might ad, republican members. Not to worry. The law will stand up to court challenges. The state budget in Wisconsin will finally be balanced'..

Are you going to cite those polls or do we just have to take your word for it?


You should know by know, that he's a conservative, and as such, unable to publish FACTS and EVIDENCE that is both VERIFIABLE and UNBIASED.

Now the REAL numbers....

quote:

Rasmussen Reports

A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Wisconsin voters shows that just 39% favor weakening collective bargaining rights and 52% are opposed. At the same time, 44% support a 10% pay cut for all state workers. Thirty-eight percent (38%) are opposed. That’s partly because 27% of Wisconsin voters believe state workers are paid too much and 16% believe they are paid too little. Forty-nine percent (49%) believe the pay of state workers is about right.


That source does go on to give quite a far bit of insight into the mood of Wisconsin citizens. They even publish the exact questions that were asked; which is very important when releasing poll numbers.

quote:

USATODAY

The poll found 61% would oppose a law in their state similar to such a proposal in Wisconsin, compared with 33% who would favor such a law.


quote:

The Pew Research

"Roughly four-in-ten (42%) say they side more with the public employee unions, while 31% say they side more with the governor, Scott Walker..."


Further down the same page, is the caption entitled "Lower-Income People Side with Unions while the Affluent are Split". Those making over $75,000 a year are nearly evenly divided over siding with the Union verse Gov. Walker. Were as those making under $75,000/year are very heavily siding with Unions. Unsurprisingly Democrats favor Unions, and the GOP Gov. Walker. Independents however, are closed divided, with a mere 5% favoring Unions over Gov. Walker. Unless someone was over 65 years of age, they voted in favor of the Unions.

Whites were nearly evenly divided supporting/opposing Gov. Walker, with 2% more, favoring the Unions. Non-Whites however, side with Unions over three times as much as those who support Gov. Walker.

Still not convinced?

Go read the entire article on GALLUP.

There is simply to much information to properly show it here. The very end of it, entitled 'Bottom Line' I believe gives a good summary:

quote:


As long as state governments can't print money, and their debt ratios are too high to continue borrowing, state lawmakers will be forced to consider raising taxes, cutting state programs, and reducing worker costs as three primary ways to balance their books. Americans don't love any of these choices, but cutting programs garners the least opposition, mainly because a solid majority of Republicans favor it. Raising taxes is the most unpopular, and is opposed by majorities of all party groups. Crafting budget policies that affect state workers may be especially difficult. The public isn't eager to see these fellow residents lose pay and benefits or union rights, but they aren't convinced unions are good for states either.

One aspect of public opinion on state employees not tested in the poll is whether Americans would rather see reduced pay and benefits for state workers or state program cuts that lead to major layoffs. This seems to be where the showdown in Wisconsin is heading, and may preview how budget battles will soon play out in state capitols across the country


So, servantforuse, where are those polls you say, that, and I quote from you "...fully support Scott Walker and the republicans"? They are unbiased and factual, right?

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 241
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 11:49:51 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
I think you are confused.

How did the bill come out of the Joint Conference Committee? The only way that happens is if it was added onto an existing bill that the conference had to reconcile different versions passed by both houses. That's why the Assembly passed the previous version on Feb. 25th, after the Senators left the state.

I think you are spinning so hard you look like a tilt-a-whirl. This is from the bill as introduced in January, and which the SENATORS skipped out on. hasnt got a fucking thing to do with it until each house has a version.

"This bill limits the right to collectively bargain for all employees who are not public safety employees (general employees) to the subject of base wages."


Do you even have a clue in reality of what exactly Collective Bargaining *IS*? Why dont you show me, you have a clue, by showing three seperate sources of the defination of "collective bargaining", and then YOUR understanding of the defination. Your are the master of spin! Even in the face of direct and provable evidence and facts, you will still spin your open lies as truth.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 242
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 12:11:31 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

We will soon see if those polls are correct or not. What the country is seeing on TV is Madison, WI, the most liberal city west of the Mississippi. That is not the pulse of Wisconsin. Scott Walker was elected for a reason.


And that reason was?

You got bored with cow tipping?

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 243
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 12:17:11 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
He promised to balance the budget without raising taxes. He is doing just what he was elected to do.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 244
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 1:36:22 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
I think you are confused.

How did the bill come out of the Joint Conference Committee? The only way that happens is if it was added onto an existing bill that the conference had to reconcile different versions passed by both houses. That's why the Assembly passed the previous version on Feb. 25th, after the Senators left the state.

I think you are spinning so hard you look like a tilt-a-whirl. This is from the bill as introduced in January, and which the SENATORS skipped out on. hasnt got a fucking thing to do with it until each house has a version.

"This bill limits the right to collectively bargain for all employees who are not public safety employees (general employees) to the subject of base wages."


Do you even have a clue in reality of what exactly Collective Bargaining *IS*? Why dont you show me, you have a clue, by showing three seperate sources of the defination of "collective bargaining", and then YOUR understanding of the defination. Your are the master of spin! Even in the face of direct and provable evidence and facts, you will still spin your open lies as truth.



ROFLMAO. You fucking idiot, advising union/employer boards are 70% of our business. Ive participated in collective bargaining for 2 strikes that were high profile enough for the Administrations at the time to intervene in.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 245
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 1:44:43 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse
He promised to balance the budget without raising taxes. He is doing just what he was elected to do.


Actually, he was elected to represent ALL the people of Wisconsin, not just 20% of them.

Do you balance a budget by giving $140 million dollars in tax give-aways to corporations, and then bitching about the budget being $140 million behind? And to concluded that the best way to make that $140 million go away, is to attack the folks that had nothing to do with it in the first place?

If this 'governor' (read: dictator) Walker truely represented the people of Wisconsin, how often did he go down to meet his fellow citizens when they were protesting in the same building that he was in? When he signed the measure in to law, was it 'in the open and public'? Or 'behind closed doors with very few people in the room'? Go ahead servantforuse, try to tell me he signed it in to law 'out in the open' and 'in the public'.

I notice that you STILL havent posted all those unbiased and verifable polls that show MORE support for Governor Walker and his Republican yes-men, and LESS support for Unions in Wisconsin. We going to get those poll results sometime this millennium?

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 246
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 1:52:32 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
ROFLMAO. You fucking idiot, advising union/employer boards are 70% of our business. Ive participated in collective bargaining for 2 strikes that were high profile enough for the Administrations at the time to intervene in.


You know willbeurdaddy, I do make an effort not to insult people directly, even though sometimes they really do deserve the insult. I would appricate it if you could be alittle more of an adult, and less a 6th grader in mind and attitude.

What exactly *IS* your business? Do you own this business? Are you a major player of the business? Where is the business located? What credentials does it hold in terms of organized labor law in the United States of America?

If you have participated in two collective bargaining efforts, then it would be fair to say, you should be able to give me an accurate defination of 'collective bargaining'. Why did you take the time to bash me, rather then, answer my question in a mature fashion?

Finally, which Administrations were these strikes associated with? The exact dates of the strikes, and the exact, unbiased information on why the strikes were conducted? What was the final outcome (again, unbiased information, please) of each strike?

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 247
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 1:55:01 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Hes a legend in his own lunch break Joe, how DARE you question him
If brains were dynamite he wouldnt have enough to blow his nose


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 248
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 1:57:58 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
The only poll that shows support for Walker and the anti union bill is FOX News. Every other poll shows low support for the bill, and the fact that there have been no large protests in support of the bill speaks volumes.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 249
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 1:59:51 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
Polling within Wisconsin is highly dependent on the wording of the question. When its a generic "limiting collective bargaining rights" it splits pretty evenly. When its "limit collective bargainging rights to wages and benefits" it favors the limitiations by about 10 points, when it is specific about the rights that will be taken away or specifies financial changes (increasing pension and health care costs) the are overwhelmingly in favor of the limitations. (As I recall that is registered voters, not likely voters)

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 250
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 2:05:55 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Hes a legend in his own lunch break Joe, how DARE you question him
If brains were dynamite he wouldnt have enough to blow his nose


RIM SHOT!

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 251
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 2:18:13 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
Polling within Wisconsin is highly dependent on the wording of the question. When its a generic "limiting collective bargaining rights" it splits pretty evenly. When its "limit collective bargainging rights to wages and benefits" it favors the limitiations by about 10 points, when it is specific about the rights that will be taken away or specifies financial changes (increasing pension and health care costs) the are overwhelmingly in favor of the limitations. (As I recall that is registered voters, not likely voters)


You really have a problem with FACTS, particularly when they go against your arguements.

Questions that are asked. This is a link from the Rasmussen Reports found from the source, listed from Post #240 above.

The polls conducted in the time frame, since the Governor signed off on the law, have shown steadily across Wisconsin, and at large, the nation, to support the Unions, and NOT, Governor Walker and Republicans. If you say they are all wrong, and not showing the correct viewpoint of Americans; perhaps you should create a list of twenty unbiased questions, and conduct an actual poll of random persons in Wisconsin, and publish the methodology, the data, and the conclusions.

Of course, that would imply you still have any credibility left, that your data wasn't tampered with, to fit, 'just fine' into your current arguement.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 252
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 2:21:40 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
ROFLMAO. You fucking idiot, advising union/employer boards are 70% of our business. Ive participated in collective bargaining for 2 strikes that were high profile enough for the Administrations at the time to intervene in.


You know willbeurdaddy, I do make an effort not to insult people directly, even though sometimes they really do deserve the insult. I would appricate it if you could be alittle more of an adult, and less a 6th grader in mind and attitude.

What exactly *IS* your business? Do you own this business? Are you a major player of the business? Where is the business located? What credentials does it hold in terms of organized labor law in the United States of America?

If you have participated in two collective bargaining efforts, then it would be fair to say, you should be able to give me an accurate defination of 'collective bargaining'. Why did you take the time to bash me, rather then, answer my question in a mature fashion?

Finally, which Administrations were these strikes associated with? The exact dates of the strikes, and the exact, unbiased information on why the strikes were conducted? What was the final outcome (again, unbiased information, please) of each strike?


You have been a condescending jackass since the day you started posting. You get back what you put in.
My business is business and investment modeling based on economic forecasting. Im a partner in it.
Given that its my business Im not going to get in some asinine discussion with a know-nothing about what collective bargaining is. Download the Taft Hartley act and masturbate on it.

I can only specify one, because it was with a former company and no longer confidential. The West Coat Longshoreman's strke against the Pacific Maritime Association. Youre free to look for the details yourself. Google is your friend.

< Message edited by willbeurdaddy -- 3/13/2011 2:27:19 PM >


_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 253
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 2:35:00 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
There have been papers filed in Wisconsin for 16 re-call elections. 8 republicans and 8 democrats. We will see soon enough if I am right or the liberals are right. The dems might just lose a couple of more seats.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 254
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 2:48:21 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Hes a legend in his own lunch break Joe, how DARE you question him
If brains were dynamite he wouldnt have enough to blow his nose




Lucy, in point of fact, his IQ drops every time he has a bowel movement.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 255
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 2:56:58 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
You wouldn’t know it if you were relying only on cable news, but according to the city of Madison, today’s protest was the largest yet. 85,000-150,000 Wisconsin residents took to the streets to stand up for their freedoms
http://www.politicususa.com/en/wisconsin-bigger-beck

http://www.cityofmadison.com/news/view.cfm?news_id=2543
OWNTOWN DEMONSTRATION Rally Spills Off Of Capitol Square The largest gathering of the recent sustained protest movement took place Saturday, March 12th with an estimated 85,000 to 100,000 people coming to downtown Madison. They mixed with about 50 farmers on tractors, and some officers reported one donkey among the masses. At the end of the rally, there had been no arrests, and only a couple of minor medical emergencies. Law enforcement would again like to thank everyone who came to the Isthmus for keeping the peace, for being patient, and for respecting those with opposing views.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 256
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 3:30:31 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
A majority of these protesters are not from Wisconsin. They are being brought in from all around the country. Leaders from SEIU, AFL-CIO my former union CWA and others are flooding Madison. They see the hand writing on the wall.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 257
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 3:41:22 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Mene mene tekel upharsin.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 258
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 3:57:53 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

A majority of these protesters are not from Wisconsin. They are being brought in from all around the country. Leaders from SEIU, AFL-CIO my former union CWA and others are flooding Madison. They see the hand writing on the wall.

Yeah all those farmers on the tractors were bussed in from LA and NYC. You should have seen the long convoys of busses pulling trailers filled with tractors going north on I-94.

I also notice that the clever folks being bussed in had gotten hold of lots of Badger and Packer wear including stocking caps and parkas.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/03/12/955694/-Updated-WisconsinCan-we-throw-a-protest-rally-or-what!-(Photo-Diary)

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 259
RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining - 3/13/2011 4:00:29 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
I guess you missed Jessi Jackson and Richard Trumpka and the fatso Michael Moore.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 260
Page:   <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109