zenny -> RE: Panel wants women in combat arms (3/12/2011 7:17:22 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Arpig quote:
My post was to remark that rape was a much more likely tool in a torturers toolbox in regards to a woman as opposed to a man. And I suggest that the average woman would handle that rape a lot better than the average man would handle having a baton shoved up his ass...a very common torture technique already in use. That's a possibility. I however don't think it would hold much water in light of women's social condition regarding rape. I think it more likely that it would not overtly affect men. Then again, I've not been able to find any studies about torture techniques, their effectiveness, usage, or resulting conditions. quote:
ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote:
ORIGINAL: truckinslave The panel made their recommendation because it advanced their social agenda, not because it improved the military. I didn't know a Pentagon commission had a social agenda. You are aware that political correctness pervades even the highest levels of learning, correct? Whether they did or didn't, it is quite plausible. quote:
ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote:
ORIGINAL: zenny I always wondered how how a 120lb woman is going to carry/drag a 220lb man out of the line of fire when he has been shot. Plus pack weight. It's not like they have vastly different fitness standards or anything. You mean there are no 120lb men serving in the military? What is the minimum weight standard? I forget. www.google.com . Thanks for missing the point though because we're obviously not talking specifically about combat units. It makes it easier to dismiss you.
|
|
|
|