RE: Types of Relations

RE: Types of Relations (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

porcelaine -> RE: Types of Relations (3/10/2011 8:19:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SillyIllySally I'm just wondering if anyone has or has had a relationship akin to what i seek. One where titles and protocol are not so important. Where you address each other by first names or terms of endearment. Where the both of you knowing that the domination and submission are always there is enough, no need for things like collars. Greetings, My relationships are usually quite protocol driven. That has never prevented me from utilizing their first name or terms of endearment in the midst of the structure. My previous partners have been Master, Sir, Daddy, and Sweetheart to name a few. This didn't diminish our ability to function at various levels of formality. In my experience our respective places were understood and implied. The outward demonstrations of his tether don't negate the internal grip one bit. They both go hand in hand. Namaste, ~porcelaine

LillyBoPeep -> RE: Types of Relations (3/10/2011 8:26:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: porcelaine The outward demonstrations of his tether don't negate the internal grip one bit. They both go hand in hand. see, even though we didn't use a lot of protocol, i still very much understand that. i'm curious about protocol; a different dimension i haven't really experienced

Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Types of Relations (3/10/2011 8:50:21 PM)
I cringe at the thought of being called "Snookums", makes my brain want to crawl out the skull...

porcelaine -> RE: Types of Relations (3/10/2011 9:06:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LillyBoPeep see, even though we didn't use a lot of protocol, i still very much understand that. i'm curious about protocol; a different dimension i haven't really experienced The key point behind protocol is its purpose and continuity. I generally discuss the subject a bit more at the other place. I've found there's some confusion in how it differs from etiquette and oftentimes the terminology is interchanged. I don't believe they're one in the same. However, most people who are protocol aficionados generally display a high degree of etiquette. [;)] Of course there are various of schools of thought on the subject. We can dish if you'd like and I'll point some resources in your direction. :) Namaste, ~porcelaine

FukinTroll -> RE: Types of Relations (3/10/2011 10:28:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: IronBear Snookums is on the table with this rider: Sir Snookums, Lord and Master and Commander of the Permanently wet Cum Slut and Ever Horney snow white Well met Sir Snookums, I am Sir Prize... shocking, I know. SLURP~

IronBear -> RE: Types of Relations (3/10/2011 10:38:21 PM)
Well met indeed Sir Prize, the honour and privilege is entirely mine. Shall we do High Tea??..

NocturnalStalker -> RE: Types of Relations (3/10/2011 10:42:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: 0ldhen quote: ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker OKAY NOW YOU WENT TOO FAR. Aw.....snooky wookyums.....don't get your undies in a twist.....it'll just ruin that honey pot cutie pie smirkle smiley wiley..... I am being griefed on the Internet!

FukinTroll -> RE: Types of Relations (3/10/2011 10:49:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: IronBear Well met indeed Sir Prize, the honour and privilege is entirely mine. Shall we do High Tea??.. At high noon I hope.

FukinTroll -> RE: Types of Relations (3/10/2011 10:50:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker quote: ORIGINAL: 0ldhen quote: ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker OKAY NOW YOU WENT TOO FAR. Aw.....snooky wookyums.....don't get your undies in a twist.....it'll just ruin that honey pot cutie pie smirkle smiley wiley..... I am being griefed on the Internet! Maybe bullied even... there is a support thread in OT that could help. SLURP~

NihilusZero -> RE: Types of Relations (3/10/2011 11:32:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FukinTroll Is Snookims off the table? "Snookims" has very strict guidelines for when it should be employed.

IronBear -> RE: Types of Relations (3/10/2011 11:32:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FukinTroll quote: ORIGINAL: IronBear Well met indeed Sir Prize, the honour and privilege is entirely mine. Shall we do High Tea??.. At high noon I hope. Of course, how could it be otherwise? I shall cause servants to afix suitable shade for such an auspicious occasion.

Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Types of Relations (3/11/2011 1:09:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: NihilusZero quote: ORIGINAL: FukinTroll Is Snookims off the table? "Snookims" has very strict guidelines for when it should be employed. I'm actually trying to rationalize why it makes my own skin crawl or my brain want to jump out the skull. I mean, it's only a mere word. What is the strong mental negative association that's truly connected with it. The way it sounds? Sort of like hitting dissonant sounding notes together on a piano? Some hidden secret vow deep inside the sub-conscious to shoot myself if I ever was with somebody that calls me that? In my book "Asshole" is more preferred compared to being called Snookums. Yeah, Yeah, Yeah... don't ever call me that again or else!! Clearly this one name, could wreck a heated passionate moment in 1.5 seconds flat... there's an automatic recoil effect in response to it. Damnedest thing.

peachgirl -> RE: Types of Relations (3/11/2011 12:02:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LaTigresse mmmm...pie.... to the OP: the great thing about being a grown-up is that you get to, with your partner, decide what kind of relationship you want to have. the Man and I have been together going on 6 years, first as a vanilla couple and then as an M/s couple...but we made that decision together. could I have that kind of relationship with another man? I doubt it. what I'm getting at is, look at the person first, then take it from there. good luck [:D]

sexyred1 -> RE: Types of Relations (3/11/2011 1:06:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SillyIllySally I'm not turned off or away by them. At the end of the day though, they are only words. In my mind actions speak louder than words. I agree. I have never had any type of D/s relationship that involved protocol. Like Poise said earlier, these are human relationships and some people find joy in using titles and protocol and others do not. Nothing is right or wrong, just right for you.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125