Holy Shit thats an UGLY baby!

Holy Shit thats an UGLY baby! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Humor and Games

Message

darq -> Holy Shit thats an UGLY baby! (5/5/2006 11:27:54 PM)
When I first uploaded my pics to CM they were both denied ... I puzzled over it but didn't really pay much attention. I just tried a couple of different pics and moved on ... Well, tonight I checked my junk mail folder and noticed the notification emails concerning my denied pics ... The first one, which was of me laying on a bed with my stuffed hello kitty behind me was denied because they believed the person in the picture was a minor. Ok, I can buy that ... Hello Kitty isn't really something most adults have. Now, the second picture was also of me, laying on the bed, closer this time. I had my puppy, Roxie, cradled in my arms ... You can clearly tell Roxie is a dog. Long face, fluffy black ears ... She's a min pin/long haired chihuahua mix ... The reason for the denial was this ... Reason: Photos containing underage individuals are not permitted. This includes parents with children and photos where children are visible in the background. Now, this isn't a complaint .. I have pics approved and I'm happy with them. But seriously, how do you mistake a DOG for a CHILD? I'm going to upload this pic elsewhere so ya'll can see for youself ... The first thing I thought of when I saw that was, who approves photos on CM? I mean, what must they have thought when they looked at that pic? "Holy Shit thats an UGLY baby!" http://www.freewebs.com/darqness/images/roxiesnuggle.bmp

SweetDommes -> RE: Holy Shit thats an UGLY baby! (5/5/2006 11:38:21 PM)
That is hysterical ... although, I have to say that Holly and I both think that you look 14 in that picture ...

darq -> RE: Holy Shit thats an UGLY baby! (5/5/2006 11:48:17 PM)
Yeah, I'm not sure why I look so young in those pics ... They were taken the same night I took the pic of me with dark hair thats currently on my profile. With the same camera phone ... The only difference is the top I'm wearing and the fact that the one thats on my profile, I took and the one with me and the puppy, my roomate took.

wolffeathers -> RE: Holy Shit thats an UGLY baby! (5/10/2006 6:49:19 PM)
Obviously, the place you had your picture agreed with CM, and thought that was one ugly baby, as there's no picture there anymore (but there is one long ass run-on sentence here)

yourMissTress -> RE: Holy Shit thats an UGLY baby! (5/10/2006 6:54:59 PM)
I would say that it's more likely that the picture was rejected because YOU appear to be so young, and less likely that the dog was mistaken for a human child.

MadameDahlia -> RE: Holy Shit thats an UGLY baby! (5/11/2006 1:15:45 AM)
I think they were referring to you when they rejected the last photograph. Think of it as a compliment. In the years to come you probably won't be carded!

slaveofdarkhold -> RE: Holy Shit thats an UGLY baby! (5/12/2006 3:15:20 AM)
Yeh on thinking about it, it's probably you that got rejected not the dog. Still it made me laugh when I read it- thanks! A little bit off topic but I do have to wonder who does the censoring of pictures on this site...It's very odd that some perfectly acceptable ones get stopped, and yet you see some with clearly showing penises, breasts etc... weird

darq -> RE: Holy Shit thats an UGLY baby! (5/13/2006 7:45:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MadameDahlia I think they were referring to you when they rejected the last photograph. Think of it as a compliment. In the years to come you probably won't be carded! I've actually never been carded ... Even when I was underage ... Its the camera ... Instead of adding 10 lbs, for me it drops 10 yrs.

MistressLove999 -> RE: Holy Shit thats an UGLY baby! (5/13/2006 8:41:44 AM)
Thanks for the laugh, was a cute story. You do look young but, in 10/20 years you will still look young and trust me that's a GOOD thing.

Petruchio -> RE: Holy Shit thats an UGLY baby! (5/15/2006 8:05:27 PM)
(grimacing) I never did get a reason why mine were rejected. My face was partially obscured, but so are a lot of others.

Moloch -> RE: Holy Shit thats an UGLY baby! (5/16/2006 1:45:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: darq When I first uploaded my pics to CM they were both denied ... I puzzled over it but didn't really pay much attention. I just tried a couple of different pics and moved on ... Well, tonight I checked my junk mail folder and noticed the notification emails concerning my denied pics ... The first one, which was of me laying on a bed with my stuffed hello kitty behind me was denied because they believed the person in the picture was a minor. Ok, I can buy that ... Hello Kitty isn't really something most adults have. Now, the second picture was also of me, laying on the bed, closer this time. I had my puppy, Roxie, cradled in my arms ... You can clearly tell Roxie is a dog. Long face, fluffy black ears ... She's a min pin/long haired chihuahua mix ... The reason for the denial was this ... Reason: Photos containing underage individuals are not permitted. This includes parents with children and photos where children are visible in the background. Now, this isn't a complaint .. I have pics approved and I'm happy with them. But seriously, how do you mistake a DOG for a CHILD? I'm going to upload this pic elsewhere so ya'll can see for youself ... The first thing I thought of when I saw that was, who approves photos on CM? I mean, what must they have thought when they looked at that pic? "Holy Shit thats an UGLY baby!" http://www.freewebs.com/darqness/images/roxiesnuggle.bmp Holy Shit thats one ugly baby!!! Was it's father from North Jersey Italian species?

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625