RE: Impeachment?

RE: Impeachment? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Sanity -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 6:10:55 PM)
Whats the supposed delusion mike (other than pandas asserting that I claimed that Clinton invaded Iraq) ? quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4u lol,nice that we have finally figured out a way to align history itself with sanity's flights of delusion....if only on this one matter.

slvemike4u -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 6:14:45 PM)
Are you kidding me sanity,I have neither the time nor the inclination to list all of the delusions that rattle around in your twisted little head.So the "other" than part will just have to go unexplored.

Sanity -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 6:16:43 PM)
You cant name even one? [:D] Okay mike, youre free to go... quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4u Are you kidding me sanity,I have neither the time nor the inclination to list all of the delusions that rattle around in your twisted little head.

flcouple2009 -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 6:17:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY I will say that there are plenty of other examples of Obama=Bush that I don't really need to even list them, do I? Bush was a socialist/communist/marxist Kenyan as well?

Sanity -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 6:20:59 PM)
Fiscally Bush WAS pretty liberal, now that you mention it, yes. quote: ORIGINAL: flcouple2009 quote: ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY I will say that there are plenty of other examples of Obama=Bush that I don't really need to even list them, do I? Bush was a socialist/communist/marxist Kenyan as well?

Lucylastic -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 6:25:09 PM)
Yes it does Sanity, because you posted the article as a response directly to the question, the fact that you added the part you did, changes the whole way people comprehend it.Thas disingenuous of you, at best.

slvemike4u -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 6:26:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity You cant name even one? [:D] Okay mike, youre free to go... quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4u Are you kidding me sanity,I have neither the time nor the inclination to list all of the delusions that rattle around in your twisted little head. Why do I need to name one...you already did.Allow me to refresh your memory....a few posts ago you asserted that Clinton Invaded Iraq(though you quickly backtracked from that erroneous assertion)

Sanity -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 6:33:54 PM)
Only in the overactive imagination of yourself and the panda man mike... I never claimed any such thing. Come step back into reality, drop the childish bullshit and discuss this topic in real world terms. Unless you have no time, as you posted a few short minutes ago quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4uWhy do I need to name one...you already did.Allow me to refresh your memory....a few posts ago you asserted that Clinton Invaded Iraq(though you quickly backtracked from that erroneous assertion)

Sanity -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 6:37:51 PM)
I posted the article but never claimed an invasion, silly goose. And pandas claim came prior to my posting that article in the first place. quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Yes it does Sanity, because you posted the article as a response directly to the question, the fact that you added the part you did, changes the whole way people comprehend it.Thas disingenuous of you, at best.

isoLadyOwner -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 6:40:09 PM)
Why are the people in other African states less worthy of protection. We're going into the Sudan next right? Even the "Decider" got Congressional approval for his idiocy. The rebels sure look inherently trustworthy. If they turn out to be the mean kind of AK 47 toting Muslim rebels then propping up a stable puppet government will require the USA to put boots on the ground. I'm sure the French will stick around to help, except they won't. Every $400,000 + cruise missile we drop would pay to employ a soccer mom possibly two but they might struggle on such a meager salary. Obama isn't apt to get Congressional approval as only neo con sociopaths, Obama Kool-Aide idealogues, Muslim rebels with AK 47s in Libya, and those with oil interests in said country seem to support funding another boneheaded military misadventure in the Middle East. The US Constitution trumps the UN Charter but to true hypocrites (Obama idealogues fit the bill perfectly), warmongering is ok as long as Obama does it. Team America F**k Yeah.

Lucylastic -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 6:43:13 PM)
[quote quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda And exactly how many times did Clinton invade Iraq? Got even a rough estimate, for that matter? http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3607739 This was what you posted the article in response to So you are posting it to respond that he did in fact "invade" and then changed it when you read mikes post then you went back to deny it.... I have snapshots of the page would you like me to post them?

slvemike4u -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 6:43:39 PM)
Don't forget the lovely Lucy....and perhaps the "silent majority" of sensible ,intelligent thread readers that are at this moment laughing their damm asses off at your frantic backpedaling.Who knows how many that group might include.

FirmhandKY -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 6:47:44 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic [quote quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda And exactly how many times did Clinton invade Iraq? Got even a rough estimate, for that matter? So you are posting it to respond that he did in fact "invade" How about Serbia? Firm

Sanity -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 6:50:52 PM)
Please do, because you dont have any such thing! [:D] Are you and panda and mike done with your silly little derail yet? Can the grownups talk some more? quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic [quote quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda And exactly how many times did Clinton invade Iraq? Got even a rough estimate, for that matter? http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3607739 This was what you posted the article in response to So you are posting it to respond that he did in fact "invade" and then changed it when you read mikes post then you went back to deny it.... I have snapshots of the page would you like me to post them?

TreasureKY -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 6:52:21 PM)
Fast Reply: sighs Here's a very good primer on Iraq for anyone who thinks they have all the answers. Marine Corp Institute - Iraq: An Introduction to the Country and People An overview of the rise to power and reign of Saddam Hussein starts on page 19. A breakdown of the International response to Saddam's oppression begins on page 31. Coverage of Operation IRAQI FREEDOM starts on page 53. There was much more to this than many here would like to remember. While concern over WMDs played a key role in being the "straw that broke the camel's back", there was much more to this invasion... and some serious history leading up to it. There was a reason this operation was named as it was. I won't say I like everything about the war on Iraq nor do I agree with how everything happened. I'm not fond of politicians of any flavor, and I have no special affinity for George Bush or distaste for President Obama. I will say that I'm open-minded enough to realize there's a lot more going on than some would like people to believe.

ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 6:53:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Well then, panda, Clinton never invaded Iraq.... Then why compare him to Bush, who did invade Iraq?

Sanity -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 7:00:09 PM)
The discussion taz and I were having had to do with the "Bush lied' myth, and Bill Clintons record on Iraq was relevant to that discussion. Do feel free to scroll back through and get yourself up to speed quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Well then, panda, Clinton never invaded Iraq.... Then why compare him to Bush, who did invade Iraq?

FirmhandKY -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 7:02:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4u Don't forget the lovely Lucy....and perhaps the "silent majority" of sensible ,intelligent thread readers that are at this moment laughing their damm asses off at your frantic backpedaling.Who knows how many that group might include. Mike, I hate to say it, but reading the thread it is apparent that you, Lucy and some others are intentional mis-stating his positions and then attacking those mis-statements as if they are his. You are all straw-manning him, in other words. He isn't the one who looks "strange" to the "silent majority of sensible intelligent thread readers". Firm

ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 7:05:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TreasureKY There was much more to this than many here would like to remember. While concern over WMDs played a key role in being the "straw that broke the camel's back", there was much more to this invasion... That's exactly the point. Thank you for making my argument for me. Under international law, Iraq's fictitious WMD program was the sole justification for invading Iraq. Arguing that Bush invaded Iraq for reasons other than their non-existent WMDs is admitting that he lied, and launched illegal and unprovoked war of aggression.

slvemike4u -> RE: Impeachment? (3/21/2011 7:05:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Please do, because you dont have any such thing! [:D] Are you and panda and mike done with your silly little derail yet? Can the grownups talk some more? quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic [quote quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda And exactly how many times did Clinton invade Iraq? Got even a rough estimate, for that matter? http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3607739 This was what you posted the article in response to So you are posting it to respond that he did in fact "invade" and then changed it when you read mikes post then you went back to deny it.... I have snapshots of the page would you like me to post them? There's another of your delusions Sanity...unless I am mistaken in assuming you are counting yourself amongst the group of "grownups". You make this so damm easy......I'm begging you please,please try to raise your game a bit.

Page: << < prev 6 7 [8] 9 10 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875