RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"?

RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

pahunkboy -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 12:29:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Ok. Lets use your analogy. My group wants to protest the local fire department because the chief was in a fight over the weekend and he hurt someone else. we go and protest, blocing the exit for the fire trucks. In your analogy, we should be allowed to block those trucks because we paid for them with our taxes. Your analogy doesnt fly. In your and the protestors opinions, the military is perpetuating a crime. Two wrongs never make anything right. Sure it would- like if they were using our resources the commit- arson, and to lay depleted uranium, and to set raging fires that did not have congressional approval. It is all for the central banks... and not you.

ChiDS -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 12:33:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl How are they contradicting the Constitution? By following orders? Are they following orders or is this some renegade base that is following its own dictates? There is such a thing as an unlawful order.

tazzygirl -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 12:36:57 PM)
Yes, there is. And he will have his day in court. Again, the protests are not the problem. The actions of the protesters seem to be the problem. Those protesters will also have their day in court. Just dont allow some viedo on youtube to sway your emotions. There is often more to the story than any one person wants us to know.

tazzygirl -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 12:39:27 PM)
pahunk, I have not addressed you directly since your half lame attempt at an appology you made to me in cmail concerning the racist comment you made on the boards. And yet you continue to try and pull me into your fantasy world of conspiracy theories. I have no desire to debate you on any subject.

pahunkboy -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 1:08:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl pahunk, I have not addressed you directly since your half lame attempt at an appology you made to me in cmail concerning the racist comment you made on the boards. And yet you continue to try and pull me into your fantasy world of conspiracy theories. I have no desire to debate you on any subject. Oh really? Give my regards to your Crown.

pahunkboy -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 1:09:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ChiDS quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl How are they contradicting the Constitution? By following orders? Are they following orders or is this some renegade base that is following its own dictates? There is such a thing as an unlawful order. Precisely. And not only to we have a right to speak, we have a duty to as well.

rulemylife -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 1:32:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Whoa... were you here in Pittsburgh when the G20 was happening? As far as your video. I saw no brutality. No one was beaten. They were lead away peacefully. Are you sure you understand what brutality looks like? Why were the police in riot gear with some heavily armed and wearing ski masks? You've read enough of my posts to know I don't go down the conspiracy theory path, but this is not something that should have happened.

tazzygirl -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 1:47:35 PM)
http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/03/21/wikileaks.protest/index.html?section=cnn_latest Shows another video of the same protest. I see many police not in riot gear. I dont know why those in the youtube video were. Nor does anyone else. I suppose if riot police were called out, its a requirement of them to wear the gear. Why were they called? Who knows? Protestors were arrested... quote: About 35 people were arrested by police in riot gear after they refused to vacate an intersection in front of the entrance to Marine Corps Base Quantico. The rally was held along with more than two dozen others around the world to protest Manning’s detention in Quantico’s brig. Ellsberg was one of the protesters arrested Sunday amid chants of “Free Bradley Manning.” Officers methodically handcuffed protesters and led them away one by one after they refused to leave U.S. Route 1 in front of the base. Prince William County police said in a statement late Sunday that about 35 people were taken into custody and charged with unlawful assembly and careless interference with traffic. One protester was also charged with assault and battery of an officer. The heavy police presence at the rally included officers from six agencies, mounted officers and tactical vehicles Ellsberg and five other protest leaders wanted to lay flowers at an Iwo Jima memorial at the base’s entrance but were kept about 40 feet away by police who had set up barriers. Col. Thomas V. Johnson, a spokesman for the Marine Corps Combat Development Command at Quantico, said access to the memorial was denied because protest activity is not permitted on base grounds. http://www.columbiadailyherald.com/articles/2011/03/21/top_stories/05wikileaks.txt Again, this is a military base they were blocking entrance to.

Kirata -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 3:10:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote: About 35 people were arrested by police in riot gear after they refused to vacate an intersection There ya go. Haul the fuckers away, hip hip hooray. Thunderbirds forever! (adjust to suit) Kirata the Driver

tazzygirl -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 3:11:45 PM)
LOL I wouldnt be surpised if many are simply released with a small fine, as what happened here at the G20.

pahunkboy -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 7:16:59 PM)
It is not that simple. The sound cannons rendered permanent hearing loss to the protesters. All by design! That is the NWO that you want.

tazzygirl -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 7:28:38 PM)
What fucking sound cannons? Im talking about Quantico, not Canada. Do try and get your delusional thoughts in order.

pahunkboy -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 7:33:31 PM)
The g20 in Pitt. Used sound cannons.

DarqueMirror -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 7:42:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ChiDS What? Do you even know why they were there? Because of the unconstitutional treatment of Manning. The only treatment of that scumbag I'd protest is allowing him to live. He should be put against a post, given his last request, and then shot. Treason in a time of war deserves only one "treatment."

tazzygirl -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 7:42:56 PM)
In the afternoon, protesters trying to march toward the convention center where the gathering is being held encountered roaming squads of police officers carrying plastic shields and batons. The police fired a sound cannon that emitted shrill beeps, causing demonstrators to cover their ears and back up, then threw tear gas canisters that released clouds of white smoke and stun grenades that exploded with sharp flashes of light. City officials said they believed it was the first time the sound cannon had been used publicly. “Other law enforcement agencies will be watching to see how it was used,” said Nate Harper, the Pittsburgh police bureau chief. “It served its purpose well.” The protesters, who did not have a permit to march, rolled a large blue metal trash container down 37th Street. It stopped short of police vehicles and in front of a women’s clothing and shoe boutique called Pavement. “It was scary,” said Alissa Martin, the shop’s owner. “You feel like you’re living in a war zone.” http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/25/us/25pittsburgh.html Cry me a river.

pahunkboy -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 7:49:57 PM)
Thats right- those savages were supposed to be in a freedom cage! HA!

DarqueMirror -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 7:49:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Cry me a river. Yeah I know. It cracks me up when people bitch about non-lethal crowd control devices. Don't like "sound cannons?" Fine, break out the real cannons.

pahunkboy -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 7:51:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DarqueMirror quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Cry me a river. Yeah I know. It cracks me up when people bitch about non-lethal crowd control devices. Don't like "sound cannons?" Fine, break out the real cannons. Right - stomp out all dissent- all avenues of redress. No room for that in the NWO.

DarqueMirror -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 7:54:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy Right - stomp out all dissent- all avenues of redress. No room for that in the NWO. But the benefit is there isn't room for conspiracy rejects like you, either. And that would be worth its weight in gold.

tazzygirl -> RE: Police consider a bunch of old people with picket signs to be an "unlawful assembly"? (3/21/2011 7:57:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy Thats right- those savages were supposed to be in a freedom cage! HA! No, the idiots were supposed to have a permit to march. You are often distracted from the facts. 50,000 dollars of damage to local businesses... and you want to cry over sound cannons? Give me a fucking break.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875