RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


mnottertail -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/25/2011 10:09:27 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


This post takes the cake, while absolutely worshipping at the shrine of yesteryears supposedly kind and caring Supreme Soviet leaders... you absolutely hate past American presidents simply because their  ideology differes from your own Stalinist leanings

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


The soviets were not trying to annex Afghanistan, but we were trying to annex the entire persian gulf, you can check some of St. Wrinklemeat's speeches for that bit of info, you are not going to hear it thru your sucking straw.



I don't know about that Mr. Hitler, the facts remain the facts, and that sort of how one has to proceed.

If everyone proceeded from no knowledge and deceit, coupled with full menstruation hysteria, then you guys would be in charge.




popeye1250 -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/25/2011 11:15:48 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

So we are going to help affect regime change without taking responsibility for any really nasty mess that might develop due to the inevitable power vacuum once Gadaffi is gone.



You're missing the point. We have classically had two responses - ignore, and jump in completely. Obama's response is to ASSIST in a multinational effort. He's also made no secret that the US involvement will not last long. Your response indicates that you think America should call the shots and singlehandedly drive things.

We're in a supporting role. We're not the star of this one.



Steven, I agree, we shouldn't be involved at all. Look at South Korea, we've had Troops there for (((60))) years now.
As I said in my "Bachman" post there is no U.S. interest in Libya.
Whenever they start pulling out the, "human rights" card you know they're treading water.
Our Troops don't exist to be going all over the world supplying foreign nationals with, "human rights."




MrRodgers -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/25/2011 11:18:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
You know that when you write & co, the & co would include 99% of Democrats who voted for and argued for and voted to fund and who are now running both of those wars.

And not incidentally its highly ironic to see an Obama supporting leftist trying to cast aspersions on so-called 'warmongers' as Obama commits our military to intervene in the internal affairs of a sovereign nation which poses no imminent threat to the U.S.

Its also fun to note that there were a lot more coalition members in Bushs coalition than there are in Obamas, and without the  Superpowers fingerprints all over it it couldnt even happen

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Well Bush & Co. reflecting their overall incompetence will have Afghan. and Iraq go down as two of the most bumbled, extended intentionally long term fiascoes in American military and foreign policy history.

It going to be all but impossible to match those unnecessary wars for profit and hegemony. So now we have the partisan, hypocritical Monday quarterbacking by the right. It would be funny if not so tragic.

Obama knows that after Bush, the US cannot yet again so soon...act unilaterally (coalitions ? hardly) and must allow these uprisings to be seen as wholly home grown. All of this crap about the French 'leading' and the UK jumping on being a problem is obviously partisan ridiculousness because the US is forced, thanx to Bush, to make clear this is not simply just...a US action.

That's too difficult for the knee-jerk warmongers to understand but this Lybia mission cannot have the superpowers' finger prints all over it.


The facts of the matter are that Bush lies to Powell who he dispatched to give a speech to the UN...full of lies. Powell has admitted as much. Got UN acquiescence because of our power and the UK et al jumping on board.

Then it took several votes and more bullshit to get a majority and then they didn't vote for such unabashed incompetence in the CPA etc. the discovery of which soon had the right wingnuts proclaim Hillary and the rest not as dissidents, not as loyal opposition but as...traitors no less. Does that make C. Powell a traitor ? Plus, the right takes Reagan off the hook for acting unilaterally why...because Grenada and Panama and Lebanon were not powers at all ?

I am not a left wing Obama supporter BTW, I am an independent old-school conservative who has a growing and depressing view of all of Wash., and because in fact presidents are hardly in charge of the big decisions some of which has us spending untold $Trillions on wars we don't need. A real conservative and everyone I've talked to agreed we should be in NO wars and never should have bought into the 'war on terror' bullshit..

The neocons have set the entire stage from which America will not now or anytime in the foreseeable future, be able to extricate itself. My whole point is the hypocritical Monday morning quarterbacking from today's right. Gingrich being one darling of the right to change his tune 180 degrees in what 7-8 days ?

I long for the conservatism that polled twice in the 80% against us getting involved in WWI or II both of which were set-ups. Like I've written, what we see today is not your father's republican party.






hlen5 -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/25/2011 11:45:37 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

................coupled with full menstruation hysteria,............




No-fly zone: necessary
The above description: NOT




DomKen -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/25/2011 1:18:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


No, not true. Think about our role in Afghanistan when the Soviets were trying to annex it.

DomKen to this day likes to rail against Oba, er, Reagan for that episode.

role. We're not the star of this one.

You're making stuff up again.




DomKen -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/25/2011 1:19:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


There is no hypocrisy on my part you simply fail to understand my argument(s). If we were to act the time would have been prior to the rebels being decimated, if we are to act we should do so decisively and behind strong leadership as opposed to some divided political committee.

Is that clear enough for you?

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Sanity complained that we didn't act sooner, then complained that we were acting at all and now whines that we aren't the ones in charge. He either doesn't understand the hypocrisy of his statements or he simply doesn't care.


I understand that you cannot be so stupid as to believe anyone will believe that horseshit.




slvemike4u -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/25/2011 1:41:15 PM)

Sorry Ken,I must disagree on the above...he can be,and is in fact that stupid.All the evidence is on my side,one could,were one of a mind to,look back and see this for themselves.




Hillwilliam -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/25/2011 2:12:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

When did he say he was a Stalinist?

DAMN, all this time, I thought he was a Marxist.




bighappygoth39 -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/25/2011 2:20:55 PM)

Perhaps it was a typo for Satanist?




isoladyboss -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/25/2011 2:41:56 PM)

The Rebel forces will be running things if the USA is successful.

The rebels might not be better leaders than Quaddafi, they might be Taliban. I doubt they will look out for US interests if they run Libya.

This will probably turn out like arming the Taliban did against the USSR and/or when the US created a power vacuum in Iraq.

The expense alone of these attacks is already insane. We'll see if the voters choose a third war or a regime change to the GOP.

The Democrats don't look like the lesser of two evils anymore. Warmongers are no better labeled a Democrat.

Independents don't care about the GOP or DNC label, they care about the interests of the USA.

The DNC doesn't get a discount on cruise missiles. The USA can't afford a third conflict.

I don't see these Rebels with machine guns as more worthy of US help, quite the opposite.



Why not help out in the Congo?





Hillwilliam -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/25/2011 2:58:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: isoladyboss

Why not help out in the Congo?



No oil.




popeye1250 -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/25/2011 3:24:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Sorry Ken,I must disagree on the above...he can be,and is in fact that stupid.All the evidence is on my side,one could,were one of a mind to,look back and see this for themselves.




Ah,.....Mike, *you're* the one who thinks Oblunder is going to be re-elected.
DomKen could run against him and win.




DarkSteven -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/25/2011 5:24:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Ah,.....Mike, *you're* the one who thinks Oblunder is going to be re-elected.
DomKen could run against him and win.

DomKen could run against the GOP field and win too.  What's your point?




DomKen -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/26/2011 6:10:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Ah,.....Mike, *you're* the one who thinks Oblunder is going to be re-elected.
DomKen could run against him and win.

DomKen could run against the GOP field and win too.  What's your point?


If pops keep endorsing me I might run for the GOP nomination.




mnottertail -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/26/2011 6:40:32 AM)

Then you'd have to do all them american legion breakfasts, and it didn't work out so good for hipshooter.




thishereboi -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/26/2011 7:14:37 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

................coupled with full menstruation hysteria,............




No-fly zone: necessary
The above description: NOT


So it's alright to call a women a dumb twat, but your going to call mnot to task for that? Seriously?




mnottertail -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/26/2011 7:23:30 AM)

people call me a dick all the time, but only those lesser beings of little worth (much less than the oxygen they consume) would call me dumb.

(lol, that ones gonna seethe somebody).




DarkSteven -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/26/2011 7:26:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Ah,.....Mike, *you're* the one who thinks Oblunder is going to be re-elected.
DomKen could run against him and win.

DomKen could run against the GOP field and win too.  What's your point?


If pops keep endorsing me I might run for the GOP nomination.



Release a bunch of tweets that hint that you're going to consider forming an exploratory committee any day now.




mnottertail -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/26/2011 7:29:33 AM)

Well if we could get him to singlehandedly club some seals or take down the soviet union, it would give him some street cred.

Karl




DarkSteven -> RE: Fareed Zakariah on Obama's Libya strategy. (3/26/2011 7:31:26 AM)

WTF?  Simply railing against regulations on thieves who recently pocketed $700 bil doesn't cut it any more?






Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875