RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama

RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

flcouple2009 -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:57:05 AM)
Oh don't worry it's all over the news now. Not to mention the fact that he said it on NBC and that video is on the web as well. Of course you don't remember positing all of the drudge links using Newt railing on about how he would have just enforced a no fly zone immediately himself. I am sure RML will be along soon enough to repost them for you.

Sanity -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 8:02:03 AM)
I think rabid cave bats might have better reading comprehension than you do. I didnt write that I didnt post something like that, I wrote that I dont recall posting it. quote: ORIGINAL: flcouple2009 Oh don't worry it's all over the news now. Not to mention the fact that he said it on NBC and that video is on the web as well. Of course you don't remember positing all of the drudge links using Newt railing on about how he would have just enforced a no fly zone immediately himself. I am sure RML will be along soon enough to repost them for you.

DarkSteven -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 8:51:00 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Yeah, their fall line-up looks pretty fuckin weak, won't even run past the pilot episode for most of them out there, wonder who is gonna end up taking one for the gipper. Cuz that's what it is. I wouldn't use the term 'weak' as much as flawed. Gingrich, Romney, Huntsman, and Huckabee are not dumb. And Palin is a master at generating and managing media buzz. But every candidate is very susceptible to attack.

slvemike4u -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 9:22:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity You know what the right has that the left doesnt have steven? Our candidates get vetted by the media. Chances are that by the time the primaries are in full swing we will know exactly who each Republican candidate is, we will know what he or she stands for, and we will know if there are any insane Jeremiah Wrights barking away in their closets. And thats a plus for us. quote: ORIGINAL: DarkSteven http://news.yahoo.com/s/theweek/20110324/cm_theweek/213461 Ginmgirs could have enforced a no-fly zone immediately, as long as Obama didn't. As soon as Obama did, Gingrich decided that he would never have done it. Adultery is wrong if a Dem does it, military action is wrong if a Dem does it... Let us, for the sake of argument,grant you that "plus". How does that overcome the fact that all of your so called contenders are empty suits. By the way,(again giving you the benefit of the "plus")...we(the democrats) have the actual office.....Campaigning as a sitting President is again a "plus" for our side(sheesh this your side,my side ledger stuff is fun ,isn't it...especially since my side has all of the advantages...lol)

slvemike4u -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 9:25:37 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity I think rabid cave bats might have better reading comprehension than you do. I didnt write that I didnt post something like that, I wrote that I dont recall posting it. quote: ORIGINAL: flcouple2009 Oh don't worry it's all over the news now. Not to mention the fact that he said it on NBC and that video is on the web as well. Of course you don't remember positing all of the drudge links using Newt railing on about how he would have just enforced a no fly zone immediately himself. I am sure RML will be along soon enough to repost them for you. Split hairs much?

Moonhead -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 9:27:55 AM)
You'd have thought 8 years of institutionalised media whitewashes on the chimp might have finally shut these republicans up from whining about the liberal press bias. Obviously not...

Lucylastic -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 9:43:22 AM)
The media savaged her yet people still think she will be a good president after all they know/ignore so its not the medias fault altho Im glad she has said she" isnt going to complain about the lamestream media anymore , its not productive"... I wonder how long thats gonna last, I wonder if she yet knows she cant possibly do anything but hurt the GOP mind you that doesnt worry her it seems by her other comments about the lack of good candidates so far in the GOP mild hijack to respond to the right about having media vet their looonies.

flcouple2009 -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 9:44:17 AM)
Nothing wrong with my reading comprehension. I stated "of course you don't remember". What I am plainly saying is that I don't believe you. Of course I wouldn't want to remember posting this now. http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/03/gingrich-on-libya-thankfully-french-not-distracted-by-brackets.php Funny you were slobbering all over the Newt nut sack then but now can't remember at all. Jog your memory or do you want the specific post?

Sanity -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 9:48:01 AM)
...

mnottertail -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 9:50:37 AM)
Run Forrest!!!!!! Run!!!!!!

Sanity -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 9:57:42 AM)
Float on by, little turd. quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Run Forrest!!!!!! Run!!!!!!

mnottertail -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 10:06:10 AM)
Are you allowed to be on these boards as a convicted child molester? Was that a W policy or Reagan?

flcouple2009 -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 10:12:03 AM)
Old Newt and Sanity, Flip and Flop.

Sanity -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 11:08:13 AM)
mnots projecting again quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Are you allowed to be on these boards as a convicted child molester? Was that a W policy or Reagan?

MrRodgers -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 11:32:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity The moment she stepped into the spotlight the media erupted at her as quickly and as viciously as is humanly possible quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail I believe we both have said that. Are you saying she was vetted? Certainly the media vetted her, that took all of 12 seconds, but that was way past your CPAC or your primary, and after you bought her some dresses that seem to get DYB all in a rut. The only problem for the lack of right wing vetting, is the media soon got it right. She was a politically expedient bimbo in a ridiculously veiled attempt for women voters. Your complaints, typical of the right wing seeking a special media deference just for Palin.

popeye1250 -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 11:43:40 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DarkSteven http://news.yahoo.com/s/theweek/20110324/cm_theweek/213461 Ginmgirs could have enforced a no-fly zone immediately, as long as Obama didn't. As soon as Obama did, Gingrich decided that he would never have done it. Adultery is wrong if a Dem does it, military action is wrong if a Dem does it... And getting us involved in another war is ok with the left if Oblunder does it.

Lucylastic -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 11:50:44 AM)
Had you not got most of the lefties on ignore you would know that is not the case. Bloody hell I keep forgetting he has me on ignore, may he be forever ignorant and amusing in that ignorance theres that pope thought again

flcouple2009 -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 12:51:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Had you not got most of the lefties on ignore you would know that is not the case. Bloody hell I keep forgetting he has me on ignore, may he be forever ignorant and amusing in that ignorance theres that pope thought again He can read it now Lucy. The problem is he's confused about what a "lefty" really is since he always claims to be the moderate in the middle.

slvemike4u -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 12:54:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Had you not got most of the lefties on ignore you would know that is not the case. Bloody hell I keep forgetting he has me on ignore, may he be forever ignorant and amusing in that ignorance theres that pope thought again I don't think I'm on ignore Lucy(by the way is that your website linked in the other thread?)

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 12:58:24 PM)
FR Try following the chronology of Gingrich's positions, if your attention span is that long. He said that if he had control of the entire situation, he would not have commited US involvement at all. However, once Blowboy opened his big mouth and said "Qadaffi must go", that option was off the table. Given that was off the table, the best alternative was to go in immediately and not dither around at the cost of thousands of lives and the momentum that was lost. No flip flop whatsover.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875