RE: The tangled web in Wisconsin

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: The tangled web in Wisconsin

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The tangled web in Wisconsin

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: The tangled web in Wisconsin - 4/4/2011 7:08:26 AM

truckinslave

Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline

There are two judges who have ruled against 0bama0Care. Which one, and what lobbying firm? Give me something to start on, please.

Virginia Thomas is an executive with a group that I believe filed an amicus curiae with SCOTUS concerning CU. She did not, so far as I know, "advise" on the matter, and her earnings over a five-year period are reported as far short of a million. You are correct- no conflict of interest, and certainly no outrage by me.

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to housesub4you)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: The tangled web in Wisconsin - 4/4/2011 7:10:50 AM

truckinslave

Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline

There are clearly reasons for recusal that have nothing to do with financial matters.

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: The tangled web in Wisconsin - 4/4/2011 7:19:41 AM

Moonhead

Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

As your notion is obviously that the most important quality for a Presidential candidate is executive experience, am I to take it that you voted for Perot in '92 and the succesful peanut farmer in '76? How about Al "climate man" Gore back in '00, as he came from a business background?

Or is this just some mantra you and the rest of the teabaggers have picked up from Rush to try to credit caribou Barbie with something the Kenyan can't lay claim to, however irrelevant?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to truckinslave)

Profile

Post #: 23

RE: The tangled web in Wisconsin - 4/4/2011 7:21:31 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

We have one small bit of agreement then. However that was not the thrust nor a substantial consideration of my point. The point is, for what reason is there to recuse?

Absolutely none.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to truckinslave)

Profile

Post #: 24

RE: The tangled web in Wisconsin - 4/4/2011 7:39:03 AM

truckinslave

Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline

quote:

We have one small bit of agreement then.

Here? Not so much.

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Profile

Post #: 25

RE: The tangled web in Wisconsin - 4/4/2011 9:23:05 AM

DomKen

Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

Senate Chief Clerk (a non-partisan position) Rob Marchant, whose job it is to advise on such things, is all over the web opining both before and after the meeting in question that all legal niceties were met.

Do your own damned research.

Maing shit up again.

Marchant said

quote:

However, Marchant said it is unclear whether they abided by the 2-hour minimum notice even with the exception of a "good cause."

"At that time I believed there was two hours notice given," Marchant said. "There wasn't, from the sound of it, or at least it's not possible to say with 100 percent that two hours notice was given."

http://www.dailycardinal.com/news/judge-sumi-continues-tro-on-union-law-1.2139521

(in reply to truckinslave)

Profile

Post #: 26