How Wisconsin GOP and Kathy Nickolaus Could Have Stolen the Supreme Court Election if They had Wante

How Wisconsin GOP and Kathy Nickolaus Could Have Stolen the Supreme Court Election if They had Wante (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Brain -> How Wisconsin GOP and Kathy Nickolaus Could Have Stolen the Supreme Court Election if They had Wante (4/10/2011 7:19:16 PM)
More Karl Rove type dirty tricks - this is too important not to do a recount. There should be 100% certitainty who won. How Wisconsin GOP and Kathy Nickolaus Could Have Stolen the Supreme Court Election if They had Wanted to By Eric Nelson Given the astounding and troubling information that is now coming out of Waukesha county and the abhorrent lack of transparency and accountability in the data handling protocols that were in place within that election office, one might have reason to be a little uncomfortable with hearing about 14,315 missing votes 29 hours after the initial tallies were supposed to be done. One might also find that the additional votes going to David Prosser were just exactly enough to push his lead outside the 0.5% margin of victory preventing an automatic state-funded recount. The explanation that Kathy gave for this oversight in the press conference on Thursday was that she forgot to hit the save button and this was why the votes were missing in the preliminary tallies on election night. This explanation is a little suspect and doesn't make sense given that she also said she was working on an Access database. Access as with almost all database programs don't have save buttons, they continuously save all entries immediately after they have been entered into the computer. Another question that still needs to be answered is why the Brookfield clerk was asked by Kathy for two versions of her results with one being in a different format from all the other state wide standardized data…..Couple all of this with the fact that Kathy Nickolaus had been previously granted immunity in a criminal investigation in 2002 of the GOP caucus in Wisconsin [ref].More recently she had been warned on numerous occasions that her procedures andtechniques were not appropriate for handling election data[ref]. Now you have left yourself with one precinct out of the total 198 having no votes. Presto!! You can now say, it was pure simple human error because how could there be no votes for the city of Brookfield? http://www.opednews.com/articles/How-Wisconsin-GOP-and-Kath-by-Eric-Nelson-110409-822.html

slvemike4u -> RE: How Wisconsin GOP and Kathy Nickolaus Could Have Stolen the Supreme Court Election if They had Wante (4/10/2011 7:24:52 PM)
I'm sure servant will be along to explain why we need not be concerned [8\|]

Lucylastic -> RE: How Wisconsin GOP and Kathy Nickolaus Could Have Stolen the Supreme Court Election if They had Wante (4/10/2011 7:37:56 PM)
I read that they found Obamas Birth certificate in Waukesha, along with the missing votes

slvemike4u -> RE: How Wisconsin GOP and Kathy Nickolaus Could Have Stolen the Supreme Court Election if They had Wante (4/10/2011 7:48:38 PM)
Did they happen to come across your lost avatar......yanno any of the last half dozen you have used....or as I like to think of it...anything but what you are currently using !

fmfclwu -> RE: How Wisconsin GOP and Kathy Nickolaus Could Have Stolen the Supreme Court Election if They had Wante (4/11/2011 10:56:34 PM)
Statistically speaking, it is almost certain Prosser won legitimately and the election was not "stolen." However, Nickolaus' shady past, along with the coincidence (hopefully) that her revised totals put Prosser over the margin necessary to avoid a recount by just 3 votes (at the time), mean that the county should definitely be audited, and perhaps the state should make standardized vote counting methods mandatory so this doesn't happen again. Wait, what am I saying? Politicians have clearly earned the benefit of the doubt when it comes to trusting their honesty #NotIntendedToBeAFactualStatement.

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125