RE: sub guys limits

RE: sub guys limits (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive

Message

GreedyTop -> RE: sub guys limits (4/29/2011 7:02:32 AM)
adores LadyP.. sends scritchies to the furbaies, and LOTS of love to her and MrP

LadyPact -> RE: sub guys limits (4/29/2011 7:05:29 AM)
Thanks, Hon. They are all sleeping. It's only My silly self that's awake. I'll pass them on when they all get out of bed. [:)]

GreedyTop -> RE: sub guys limits (4/29/2011 7:07:49 AM)
please.. send some of teh sleepy stuff to my kids? sigh I WANNA sleep.. it seems they have other plans....

BonesFromAsh -> RE: sub guys limits (4/29/2011 7:09:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact OP, I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt. While Bones is actually correct that we've had some great past threads where people discussed their various limits, they might be very difficult to find because the keywords that you would have to use to search for them would be so common that they appear in all kinds of threads. There is some really good stuff in those past threads, but you may have to search for them by paging back, rather than using the search feature. (Bones is actually better at this than I am on some occasions, so she may be able to recall certain thread titles.) Good morning LadyPact, You're correct in that past threads regarding the OP's topic are difficult to find, I did look, but that was mainly due to his lack of clarification on the actual topic. If he wants to see if others have similar limits, he could do as I suggested and simply perv profiles. If, as I believe, his question is tied to his other thread regarding the woman who called him out for whatever reason, well that's a horse of a different color and, again, one I addressed already. What I'm reading from the OP is sour grapes over a failed online connection. He needs to learn to let things roll like water off a duck's back if he plans to stay online, in my opinion of course.

mancslave2 -> RE: sub guys limits (4/29/2011 7:10:35 AM)
im fully intending to meet. but for obvious reasons would prefer to meet someone from futher afield to dominate me who i wont run into in the shops. she seemed up for meeting then ditched me suddenly on those limits. it seems im right, there is little basis to claim i am someone else just on spelling and common limits. how many more ways can you spell pooh? or poo. she seemed good. just a shame shes obviously either not serious or is slightly unhinged.

GreedyTop -> RE: sub guys limits (4/29/2011 7:11:18 AM)
~FR~ teh OP reminds me of Kevin.

BonesFromAsh -> RE: sub guys limits (4/29/2011 7:14:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mancslave2 im fully intending to meet. but for obvious reasons would prefer to meet someone from futher afield to dominate me who i wont run into in the shops. she seemed up for meeting then ditched me suddenly on those limits. it seems im right, there is little basis to claim i am someone else just on spelling and common limits. how many more ways can you spell pooh? or poo. she seemed good. just a shame shes obviously either not serious or is slightly unhinged. I tried to be subtle, really I did... quote: *ETA....You know, there's the old saying that everyone has a twin somewhere in the world. Oddly enough, you (or at least your screen name) plays into this...minus the #2 OP, when I did a search for your screen name, I was given 2 entries. The only difference is that one had the #2 at the end. Could this have something to do with her claim that you're someone else?

LadyPact -> RE: sub guys limits (4/29/2011 7:19:18 AM)
GT, just wait until it's moving time. They'll sleep after the car ride. LOL. quote: ORIGINAL: BonesFromAsh Good morning LadyPact, You're correct in that past threads regarding the OP's topic are difficult to find, I did look, but that was mainly due to his lack of clarification on the actual topic. If he wants to see if others have similar limits, he could do as I suggested and simply perv profiles. If, as I believe, his question is tied to his other thread regarding the woman who called him out for whatever reason, well that's a horse of different color and, again, one I addressed already. What I'm reading from the OP is sour grapes over a failed online connection. He needs to learn to let things roll like water off a duck's back if he plans to stay online, in my opinion of course. You've got points on both counts, though I think it might be less time consuming to read the past threads. Information all in one place and all of that. There was one that wasn't too long ago that I thought was fantastic resource material. Good conversation between the participants, too.

mancslave2 -> RE: sub guys limits (4/29/2011 7:24:38 AM)
mancslave2 was created today to send a message to someone who had blocked me. at the time in question i had one account. its not sour grapes. im wondering if my assumption is correct that those limits are a common list or not. the other thread was to question if im the only one who loathes the misuse of subs willingness by ripoff merchants trying to run scams luring people into sending monetary 'tribute' online in the hope of meeting. please dont assume im stupid or desperate just cos im online looking for kinks or cos im submissive.

GreedyTop -> RE: sub guys limits (4/29/2011 7:29:41 AM)
you were blocked? and this isnt sour grapes? snerk

BonesFromAsh -> RE: sub guys limits (4/29/2011 7:31:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mancslave2 please dont assume im stupid or desperate just cos im online looking for kinks or cos im submissive. I never assumed anything of the sort. Please don't assume I'm not trying to offer useful advice simply because I choose to add a silly emoticon along with a word or two. It really does all come down to interpretation. ETA.... quote:* mancslave2 was created today to send a message to someone who had blocked me. Are you still going to say you aren't being a bit obsessive?

thishereboi -> RE: sub guys limits (4/29/2011 7:35:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mancslave2 im fully intending to meet. but for obvious reasons would prefer to meet someone from futher afield to dominate me who i wont run into in the shops. she seemed up for meeting then ditched me suddenly on those limits. it seems im right, there is little basis to claim i am someone else just on spelling and common limits. how many more ways can you spell pooh? or poo. she seemed good. just a shame shes obviously either not serious or is slightly unhinged. What obvious reasons would those be?

LadyPact -> RE: sub guys limits (4/29/2011 7:36:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mancslave2 mancslave2 was created today to send a message to someone who had blocked me. You do realize that most women on the site have had problems with people like you who do the above? If somebody blocked you, that means they want you to leave them alone. The fact that you can't respect that shows you in a very poor light.

coookie -> RE: sub guys limits (4/29/2011 8:25:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mancslave2 how many more ways can you spell pooh? or poo. Well most would say scat or shit or toilet play or poop .... many many would not say pooh since that is winnie's name ..a few would say poo ....... i am not saying you are or are not the other person she spoke to because to be frank i do not care. edited to add: I think the chances of two people's limits to be EXACT is uncommon. There will be many similarites though likely not exact

leadership527 -> RE: sub guys limits (4/29/2011 8:43:57 AM)
I think you're getting to my concern also LP. I was struggling with, "So if I write that we don't have limits" what does that convey? We're not a new couple just meeting each other for the first time. Of what use would limits be for a couple that'd already been together as long as we have. I find limit comparisons to be way too contextual to mean much. Insofar as trying to "fingerprint" subs on the basis of limits that seems pretty specious. I see the same handful of limits come up constantly. I even laugh and call some of them "the standard exclusion set from total".

Delilya -> RE: sub guys limits (4/29/2011 11:21:35 AM)
OP the best thing you can do is move on. Apparently you are having trouble doing that, but I strongly encourage it. Why obsess over something that didn't work out? There are more women out there and you'd be better served using your time to find one, than worrying about the one that got away.

mancslave2 -> RE: sub guys limits (4/30/2011 2:45:18 AM)
many good points. if a user is a scam and blocks you for not being willing to pay cash online to be ripped off you should point out your willingness to meet and pay in person if services are to follow. if they refuse and blocked you in the first place theyre scum just here to rip people off and dont deserve anyones respect. common set from the total, yeah thats kinda what im saying. im thinking those are common enough ones that we all know some people like and we have to point out when its not for us. my issue is that shes incorrect about whoever she thinks i am and if shes gonna see that then we might get on. either that or shes narrow minded and not worth anyones time even if she has got nice tits and sounds fun.

GreedyTop -> RE: sub guys limits (4/30/2011 4:56:24 AM)
yawn please be original with your own thread?

Wheldrake -> RE: sub guys limits (4/30/2011 12:51:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mancslave2 no blood. no pooh. no violence. nothing public. no pics no vids no marking no piercing no pain, within reason. very mild pain ok,. like spanking, torture and beating not ok To be honest, I can see why she was suspicious. In my experience "pooh" is a lot less common than "poo" unless someone is making a A. A. Milne reference, and I can't imagine that too many submissive men rule out anything more than "very mild" pain (although the other limits you've listed are extremely common). I agree with others who say that it's probably best for you to just let this go. You were the victim of an unfortunate misunderstanding, and I'm sure it's frustrating, but life is short and she's not the only dominant woman in the world.

littlewonder -> RE: sub guys limits (4/30/2011 12:53:59 PM)
everything. Seriously if I was meeting someone for the first time the last thing on my mind is him dominating me. The only thing on my mind is meeting, having coffee and talking...that's it. Now if I was doing casual play, which isn't my thing at all....wehre would I begin...there are a ton of things off limits. Thankfully I don't have those worries anymore.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875