RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders

RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Sanity -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 7:10:43 AM)
Actually rml, all I am "condemning" in that particular post is the blatant two faced hypocrisy on display by the left. quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Libya disabled children school hit in NATO strike Its different now though... It certainly is. Now we have you condemning what you have repeatedly praised in Iraq. I guess that whole liberation thing goes out the window when it is done by a President you don't like.

TheHeretic -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 7:13:57 AM)
Waste of keystrokes, Sanity.

flcouple2009 -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 7:22:29 AM)
You link to a news story. This means? For hypocrisy you might try showing people applauding the act or referring to it as OK. To really strengthen your point it would be great to show those same people condemning any similar acts which took place previously. Come now, I would expect better since Sanity and Rich are both well versed in hypocrisy and being hypocrites.

rulemylife -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 7:22:33 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Actually rml, all I am "condemning" in that particular post is the blatant two faced hypocrisy on display by the left. quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Libya disabled children school hit in NATO strike Its different now though... It certainly is. Now we have you condemning what you have repeatedly praised in Iraq. I guess that whole liberation thing goes out the window when it is done by a President you don't like. And you don't find any hypocrisy in your own statements regarding Iraq?

rulemylife -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 7:24:25 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheHeretic Waste of keystrokes, Sanity. I'm not sure Sanity likes you massaging his ass as much as you seem to like doing it.

TheHeretic -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 7:31:37 AM)
Got anything to add to the actual subject, Flco? Oh wait. I forgot. You don't do that, do you?

LoneWolf13 -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 7:40:32 AM)
Why not just send an elite sniper team to take him out instead of blowing up his house and killing kids.

Jeffff -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 7:42:58 AM)
Because an elite sniper is good to about 1000 yards, often less depending on the weather. How do you get them in unseen, and out alive?

rulemylife -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 7:46:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheHeretic Got anything to add to the actual subject, Flco? Oh wait. I forgot. You don't do that, do you? And what do you do Richie? I mean other than being dismissive of other posters to try and bolster your sad little ego. I have only rarely seen you add anything constructive to any subject.

flcouple2009 -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 7:51:13 AM)
Of course you don't see the comment as on what Sanity posted as on the topic. So predictable

flcouple2009 -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 7:55:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff Because an elite sniper is good to about 1000 yards, often less depending on the weather. How do you get them in unseen, and out alive? They wanted the body as proof.

Jeffff -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 7:57:51 AM)
We are talking about Kadafi here.

Sanity -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 8:10:24 AM)
No rml, I am and have been extremely consistent in this regard, even though you cannot understand this. quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife And you don't find any hypocrisy in your own statements regarding Iraq?

flcouple2009 -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 8:14:29 AM)
Sorry, my bad. I am not OK with just bombing places you think we might be or have been when the attack was launched. You still want the body. You kill him in a bombing attack and his personal guard spirits away the remains. His son just starts giving the orders claiming his dad is in a secure location.

subrob1967 -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 9:50:25 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DarkSteven Well, Rich, your timing was impeccable. You posted this shortly before the most successful US-sponsored assassination in history. IIRC, the only one. One interesting comment from a CNN poster: This is exactly the right kind of operation. A small unit of highly trained individuals with good intelligence go in and take out the target with no casualties themselves. Way to go SEAL team ! If this kind of tactic had been used from the beginning we would not have had to get into two extremely expensive and wasteful wars. Steven, I advocated the same idea in 2004, not that anyone remembers. I said we should let the black op's boys go in and take out all these hate preaching Mullahs right in their own back yards.

NorthernGent -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 10:11:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Libya disabled children school hit in NATO strike Its different now though... It certainly is. Now we have you condemning what you have repeatedly praised in Iraq. I guess that whole liberation thing goes out the window when it is done by a President you don't like. I would have thought that instead of arguing over which president is more culpable, you'd be asking this: why have so many Americans died in foreign countries for no obvious gain? Over here, people aren't pleased that young British lads are dying miles away for something that most of us believe is concerned with trade and the spread of values rather than any threat, to the point where the parents of dead soldiers have attempted to sue the government through the courts. Seems like a waste of life to me - no matter which political party is running the show.

Musicmystery -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 10:59:13 AM)
quote: And what would you call a direct attack upon a foreign leader that we are most certainly NOT at war with? "Preemptive invasion"?

Musicmystery -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 11:01:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subrob1967 quote: ORIGINAL: DarkSteven Well, Rich, your timing was impeccable. You posted this shortly before the most successful US-sponsored assassination in history. IIRC, the only one. One interesting comment from a CNN poster: This is exactly the right kind of operation. A small unit of highly trained individuals with good intelligence go in and take out the target with no casualties themselves. Way to go SEAL team ! If this kind of tactic had been used from the beginning we would not have had to get into two extremely expensive and wasteful wars. Steven, I advocated the same idea in 2004, not that anyone remembers. I said we should let the black op's boys go in and take out all these hate preaching Mullahs right in their own back yards. In fact, until Bush II, that's largely what we did.

TheHeretic -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 6:39:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: And what would you call a direct attack upon a foreign leader that we are most certainly NOT at war with? "Preemptive invasion"? No, I don't think that's it, Muse. Events elsewhere seem to have stolen the headlines from this theater. Let us all hope that success on that front doesn't cause anyone to get cocky on this one.

thompsonx -> RE: Assassination of Foreign Leaders (5/2/2011 6:56:31 PM)
quote: Steven, I advocated the same idea in 2004, not that anyone remembers. I said we should let the black op's boys go in and take out all these hate preaching Mullahs right in their own back yards. The corolary then would be if the mullahs were to have their black ops boys go in and take out all the hate preaching fuckwads who post on the net...you kewel wid dat?

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.171875