cuckolding (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


studentz20 -> cuckolding (5/1/2011 2:08:11 PM)

What is the percentage ratio to cuckolds, mistresses, and bulls?

I predict there are more cuckolds than bulls and mistresses, and probably fewer mistresses than bulls....





NocturnalStalker -> RE: cuckolding (5/1/2011 2:15:48 PM)

Check how much people around you are into saving the environment to the point of banning water bottles.

There's your answer.




Palliata -> RE: cuckolding (5/1/2011 2:16:06 PM)

The problem would be the definition of 'bull' really. I'm betting most doms would be more or less open to it. As far as those listing it as a specific interest in their profile, I'm not too sure.




farglebargle -> RE: cuckolding (5/1/2011 2:22:27 PM)

Let's consider this formula a bit.

So, 'cuckolds' would be the lowest common denominator, and pretty much is defined in this ratio as 1.

1:

Next, assuming 'mistresses' means unfaithful legally married wives there would most often be, again, one per husband.

1:1

Now, the real variable is the 'bulls', so to speak. The real question is, "On average, how many wives does each bull service?"

I *suspect* it approaches 1 for any significant sample size.

Giving us a ratio of 1:1:1





Palliata -> RE: cuckolding (5/1/2011 2:40:54 PM)

Well the thing would be that a cuckold enthusiast male without a female to fulfill that would still count towards the first, and a cuckold enthusiast female without a male to fulfill it would, similarly, count towards the second, and so forth.




farglebargle -> RE: cuckolding (5/1/2011 5:16:30 PM)

quote:

Well the thing would be that a cuckold enthusiast male without a female


I don't think non-cuckolds factor into the equation. For example, would a lesbian enthusiast male w/o a female still be a lesbian? Nope.




seekingOwnertoo -> RE: cuckolding (5/1/2011 5:22:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Let's consider this formula a bit.

So, 'cuckolds' would be the lowest common denominator, and pretty much is defined in this ratio as 1.

1:

Next, assuming 'mistresses' means unfaithful legally married wives there would most often be, again, one per husband.

1:1

Now, the real variable is the 'bulls', so to speak. The real question is, "On average, how many wives does each bull service?"

I *suspect* it approaches 1 for any significant sample size.

Giving us a ratio of 1:1:1





ROFL ... I think I will frame this response to the OP!

Great comments! I love them! [;)]




studentz20 -> RE: cuckolding (5/1/2011 6:33:04 PM)

You guys are pretty smart, didnt think I would those type of witty remarks on here




salemartist -> RE: cuckolding (5/1/2011 6:36:18 PM)

oh yeah, the ratio of witty bastards to cuckolds is 12:1




DesFIP -> RE: cuckolding (5/1/2011 7:22:52 PM)

And I seriously doubt that there are a large percentage of men who want to have sex with women primarily for the purpose of humiliating some other guy they're meeting for the first time.




Hillwilliam -> RE: cuckolding (5/1/2011 7:23:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP

And I seriously doubt that there are a large percentage of men who want to have sex with women primarily for the purpose of humiliating some other guy they're meeting for the first time.

You're correct but it IS a lot of fun to do. [8D]




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125