Why there won't be transparency

Why there won't be transparency (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

mnottertail -> Why there won't be transparency (5/7/2011 7:56:20 AM)
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/06/gop-warns-obama-issue-executive-order-government-contractors/?test=latestnews Yet, these same fucksticks (local to here as well) think that unions should be required to vote yearly, and their rights should be stripped, and that no bid good old boy government contracts should be kept secret. This does not look like openness in government to me, nor does it look like the rabid right will reign in government deficits, they want to borrow and spend, see corporations are treated specially, and clip pennies and make boastful and lying statements based on that.

Termyn8or -> RE: Why there won't be transparency (5/7/2011 10:28:14 AM)
"Republicans are warning President Obama" If I am President and you warn me, you will be dead by my hand, on a gun of course. Who the fuck are these jackoffs to warn him. By EO he could abolish the senate. Try that on for size. If I were President I would have my own security between me and the SS. I would NEVER appear in public. And every fucking CIA, ATF, IRS and Mossad agent would be out for the bounty on my head. I can't trust these people like Osama trusted the Moslems for EIGHT FUCKING YEARS. Hell, for $25 million I would kill just about anyone, even Jesus. Warn the President my ass. If I were there I would warn them ! Fuck you. T^T

Real0ne -> RE: Why there won't be transparency (5/7/2011 10:39:55 AM)
anything to avoid actual records. anything not available to the public is fraud and thats a conspiracy, not theory

FirmhandKY -> RE: Why there won't be transparency (5/7/2011 11:57:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/06/gop-warns-obama-issue-executive-order-government-contractors/?test=latestnews Yet, these same fucksticks (local to here as well) think that unions should be required to vote yearly, and their rights should be stripped, and that no bid good old boy government contracts should be kept secret. This does not look like openness in government to me, nor does it look like the rabid right will reign in government deficits, they want to borrow and spend, see corporations are treated specially, and clip pennies and make boastful and lying statements based on that. Personally, in an ideal world, a democratic republic should have a disclosure database so that any money given to a political party, campaign, or PAC type organization should be publicly available and searchable. Absent that, there are issues of fairness, when only some are required to disclose. Firm

NewOCDaddy -> RE: Why there won't be transparency (5/7/2011 11:59:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or By EO he could abolish the senate. Try that on for size. After you try a straightjacket on for size.

jlf1961 -> RE: Why there won't be transparency (5/7/2011 1:25:06 PM)
Considering that the republicans fought against election reform that would have made that possible, it makes perfect sense. Show you got the money but you dont have to show who gave it to you.

Real0ne -> RE: Why there won't be transparency (5/7/2011 2:56:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/06/gop-warns-obama-issue-executive-order-government-contractors/?test=latestnews Yet, these same fucksticks (local to here as well) think that unions should be required to vote yearly, and their rights should be stripped, and that no bid good old boy government contracts should be kept secret. This does not look like openness in government to me, nor does it look like the rabid right will reign in government deficits, they want to borrow and spend, see corporations are treated specially, and clip pennies and make boastful and lying statements based on that. Personally, in an ideal world, a democratic republic should have a disclosure database so that any money given to a political party, campaign, or PAC type organization should be publicly available and searchable. Absent that, there are issues of fairness, when only some are required to disclose. Firm anyone running for office should be subject to complete top down financial disclosure, not limited to all donations trusts llc's whatever can be annexed.

rulemylife -> RE: Why there won't be transparency (5/7/2011 3:04:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne anyone running for office should be subject to complete top down financial disclosure, not limited to all donations trusts llc's whatever can be annexed. Why is that? Isn't that the tail wagging the dog? Would it not make more sense to strengthen and enforce campaign finance rules?

Real0ne -> RE: Why there won't be transparency (5/7/2011 3:07:08 PM)
champ financing should be restricted to 1000 bucks per person and taxable. let them fuck around when the irs comes in to collect the cash

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125