RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Kirata -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/20/2011 9:57:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarqueMirror

The other thing he conveniently overlooks...

The other thing he conveniently overlooks is the depraved indifference to suffering and loss of life inherent in a mindset that wants to see millions of innocent human beings deprived of any adequate means of defending themselves in a too often imperfect world.

K.




DarqueMirror -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/20/2011 10:08:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarqueMirror

The other thing he conveniently overlooks...

The other thing he conveniently overlooks is the depraved indifference to suffering and loss of life inherent in a mindset that wants to see millions of innocent human beings deprived of any adequate means of defending themselves in a too often imperfect world.

K.



True true. He'd rather people be cowering, sitting ducks than possibly have a chance.




lovmuffin -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/20/2011 11:42:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Focus50


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

I didn't miss your earlier post but I think you missed *my* point. The point was to clarify your incorrect use of the term assault weapon/rifle or assault whatever.  By definition and by design, an assault rifle is capable of fully automatic fire. The weapon in question is not an assault rifle.

I guess this is you determined to be difficult and contrary. How many different ways do I have to say that the (formerly) fully automatic Chinese military weapon in question was modified to fire only semi-auto in order for it to be accpeted for sale here? There, but for a modified catch, it's the same freakin' gun...!







I would doubt that it's the same gun but since I don't live in your country, without some research I can't speak with any authority on that so you could be correct for all I know.  Though I can tell you this. The Chinese AK 47 type rifles imported into the US were manufactured *as* semi autos with 2 manufacturer names, Norinco or Polytec (spell check on that). To make a reliable conversion to a select fire weapon would require some drilling into the receiver and the installation of 4 or 5 parts. I'm not going to get into all of  the details without doing a bit of research but if you don't have the jig for it or the exact specifications and particularly if you don't know what your doing then you will likely mess up your perfectly good rifle. There is a way some guys try to turn AK"s into *full auto only* (no option for semi auto) guns with a piece of wire or a paper clip or something tying the connector down so it won't catch the bolt carrier but this is highly unreliable, highly illegal and most likely to jam up the rifle. Since the importation of Chinese firearms were disallowed  based on a trade deal during the Clinton administration  there are now AK type rifles, once again manufactured as semi autos only, that come from former communist block nations such as Romania Bulgaria and Yugoslavia imported into the US.  I believe there are others but most of what I see are Yugoslavian. I am aware though of some AK 47's, from Bulgaria I think, that were manufactured as you described, conversions from full auto select fire to semi auto, with the safely-selector switches still on the rifles (much easier to convert or convert back to full auto with select fire). This is a rummer though but seems to have some validity, I can't be sure. The other part of the rummer is that the ATF had tried or is trying to track them down.

    Also I might add that after the Clinton assault weapon gun ban (I won't get into all the details) manufactures and importers came up with a way to circumvent the ban and thus continue the flow of, not just military type, but military semi auto rifles. [follow me on this]  One of the stupid things with this gun ban was the fact that the guns they wanted to ban are common semi autos. They were trying not to piss everyone off (*all* gun owners that is) and didn't want to place restrictions on the semi autos that were not of military type or military look-a -likes and more commonly owned by hunters.  What they banned were accessories common to military weapons and  cosmetic things. Any guns existing or imported before the ban were grandfathered in (still legal to sell) and all other future military type guns had to be manufactured here in the US but with restrictions pertaining to accessories and cosmetics. So what happened is importers started bringing in parts sets form surplus military rifles such as FN-FAL's  AK-47's  Uzi's and HK's among others. The parts kits were gleaned by cutting through the front of receivers to get the barrel off and then removing the butt stocks and all other parts. The receivers (the main body/part and considered the actual gun)  for these weapons were then manufactured and sold here in the US for those who wanted to, or obtained the parts kits to assemble them back to their original specifications minus the option to select full auto fire. These kits are off of genuine military contract surplus guns from various countries.  The complete weapon had to contain at least 7 US manufactured parts and in particular a US maufactured receiver as was in the wording of the legislation. The funny thing about this is that these guns are far easier to convert to full auto because some of the required things to do so are already done. The FN-FAL for example when resembled has 2 of 4 things on it required for full auto conversion, a raised area on the bolt carrier which otherwise would require welding and the safety selector switch on it that would otherwise have to be obtained or fabricated then replaced.  The further requirements would be obtaining or fabricating a disconnecter and a cut into the block of the receiver to accept it when the switch is on safe or semi auto.  Now because these dorks who tried to ban guns but didn't know a whole hell of a lot about what they were doing or talking about we have a crap load of semi auto rifles that are not common semi autos, but genuine military hardware minus of course the select fire option. The other funny thing about it was that the finished products were way less expensive than what they would have been otherwise if they were manufactured elsewhere and imported. I don't know what happens over there in your country but when politicians and the media start talking about gun bans, we here in the US go on a military type gun buying frenzy for fear of the supply drying up. It hasn't  happened yet as the assault weapon ban sunseted (no longer in effect) and  there are so freakin many military type firearms in the hands of the American people that you couldn't even begin to estimate how many or who has them thus insuring a decent future market and supply should a real ban ever occur. I would be curious to know what if any gun buying frenzy you may have had over there prior to your gun bans taking effect.










We are pretty well stocked up on ammo too. When our anti gun president Obama was elected we went on an ammo buying frenzy for fear of whatever type of restrictions that might be imposed as a result of this guy. Thats pretty much over now after about 2 years but at the time ammo prices went through the roof and some of it was by and large unavailable. The prices are all back down close to their former level and mostly available.





So in conclusion, here in the US for the most part it's not the same freakin gun !!!!! And you're correct, I'm determined to be difficult and contrary.




WyldHrt -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/20/2011 11:56:57 PM)

quote:

True true. He'd rather people be cowering, sitting ducks than possibly have a chance.

I really don't think so. I suspect that it is mainly a cultural difference. Oz is a country about the size of the US, but with 10% of our population. The histories of our countries are lightyears apart, despite the fact that we were both British colonies at one point.

Comparing many things between our two countries is bound to be 'apples and oranges', and this is one of them. As an aside, another is store hours. WTF can't I go grocery shopping at 10PM on Saturday night in Brisbane?? [:D]




WyldHrt -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/21/2011 12:00:14 AM)

lovmuffin- paragraphs are your friend.... seriously.




lovmuffin -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/21/2011 12:55:13 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Focus50



quote:

I disagree. It was stupid and useless. The only thing your government succeeded in doing is disarming law abiding citizens of common semi autos, that is assuming they all turned them in which I highly doubt. I also doubt the crooks disarmed or that they resort to only shooting them at gun clubs. Your government deserves criticism for banning them as do those in our government who want to ban them. Though why should I care what happens over there ?  It's non of my bees wax. Why is it you care so much about what we do over here ?

For what it's worth, I largely agree with what you're disagreeing with me about.....

As for why I care about what happens in the US, I don't - same as you about here. I'm here responding to a discussion topic is all....

Ok, it's drifted quite a bit since and I actually don't mind misery (and death) befalling those knowingly doing the wrong thing, such as in the OP. But the irony wasn't lost on me, either - the self-defeating cause and consequence of the 2nd Amendment....

Focus.






Let me see if I understand you here. Your largely disagree with your self ? Or are you beginning to sort of change your mind about what you may have thought about the private ownership of guns. I'm not sure I'm quite ready to get naked and sing Kume-Bye-Ya .
I think maybe I'll disagree with myself too. I really *do* care about what happens in Australia. I don't know as much about the history as I should but we speak the same language and Crocodile Dundee and  your Australian accents are really cool.  If we go back in time to England in the 17th century and then some we share the same history. It's a beautiful country as I have seen in pictures with stunning scenes, natural wonders and 1000's of square miles of wilderness.  I feel bad for you guys that you have lost a right to privately keep and own  modern firearms. It makes me sad to think about it.  I mean this sincerely.




Yes the thread has drifted a bit but not by much as we are taking about a private gun ownership and it pertains to this particular private gun owner using her weapon to defend herself.




The 2nd amendment of our constitution is not self defeating. I don't know how you come up with that. The original founders of the United States and particularly the anti federalists believed that governments with their standing armies and all the rest of it could not be trusted. Therefore they inserted this amendment into the constitution before it could be ratified because if a future government should become tyrannical it could be overthrown. It is presumed that as long as we're armed and retain that right it will not be needed for it's original purpose.  The fact that we use our guns to blow away would be murderers, rapists, woman butchering maniacs and other various miscreants is just a side benefit.





Right on dude !!!!!  Misery and death to all those knowingly doing the wrong thing such as in the OP.

I think  I'm ready to get naked now.










lovmuffin -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/21/2011 1:01:09 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WyldHrt

lovmuffin- paragraphs are your friend.... seriously.



I guess I got to ramblin on and wasn't paying attention. Sorry about that.

Should I redo it ?




Kirata -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/21/2011 1:01:43 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WyldHrt

I suspect that it is mainly a cultural difference.

The whole issue revolves around cultural differences.

International evidence and comparisons have long been offered as proof of the mantra that more guns mean more deaths and that fewer guns, therefore, mean fewer deaths. Unfortunately, such discussions are all too often been afflicted by misconceptions and factual error and focus on comparisons that are unrepresentative....

Looking at Tables 1–3, it is easy to find nations in which very high gun ownership rates correlate with very low murder rates, while other nations with very low gun ownership rates have much higher murder rates. Moreover, there is not insubstantial evidence that in the United States widespread gun availability has helped reduce murder and other violent crime rates. On closer analysis, however, this evidence appears uniquely applicable to the United States.


The US ain't Australia... who'd have guessed, eh?

K.






WyldHrt -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/21/2011 1:07:58 AM)

quote:

I guess I got to ramblin on and wasn't paying attention. Sorry about that. Should I redo it ?

Too late to edit, just don't blame anyone if they missed something you said in the 'wall o text'. [;)]




lovmuffin -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/21/2011 1:16:36 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WyldHrt

quote:

I guess I got to ramblin on and wasn't paying attention. Sorry about that. Should I redo it ?

Too late to edit, just don't blame anyone if they missed something you said in the 'wall o text'. [;)]





I will keep it in mind if I ever have a notion to get so long winded again.  I see exactly what you mean.




BOUNTYHUNTER -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/21/2011 1:25:42 AM)

I am a son of the south where gun ownership goes back to when the first man steped into our mountains,I have been preaching for years that you aquire you guns now hurry.For bif brother will soon make it inpossible to due so.I have many but yet say a dog ot two set the tone around here.OLD sam is getting ols so I am trainingto two sorta of replace him but he will always be my boy.A older couple last year down the road from me foiled a home invasiion byblasting away with a shot gun..shoot the basters good ridence..just the thoughts of this old Master..B




Focus50 -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/21/2011 3:30:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarqueMirror

quote:

ORIGINAL: Focus50
What "amuses" me, and something that 2nd Amendment fundamentalists can and do argue about (denial is a wonderful drug) is that the right to bear arms that enables you to protect yourselves is the very reason you need to. Cause and consequence in one neat constitutional bundle....


Incorrect. The reason we need them to defend ourselves is because the criminals (you know those guys who don't care about laws or guns bans) can, will, and do get guns with which do commit their crimes. So long as that is the case, there's no reason to deny a law-abiding citizen's right to own one.

As to the "cause and consequence" bullshit....you *are* aware firearms existed prior to the drafting of the 2nd Amendment, aren't you?

I agree, which is why there's probably a gun shop in every other shopping mall in the US. Gun availability is one of the consequences of the right to bear arms. Available to *criminals*, too! <sheesh>


quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Focus50
Well duhhhh...!

Next you'll be telling me American cars don't have 16 separate fuel tanks from front to rear.


I think the problem you have in this discussion is distinguishing Hollywood fiction from reality. You claim to know Hollywood is bullshit, yet you seem to point to it as a representation of American society.

You can't have it both ways. If you know Hollywood is fake, you can't use that as an example of the mentality of Americans.

The problem is that you can't grasp the concept of sarcasm (that "other way" I'm having). Between us, let's just go with me believing everything from Hollywood is the gospel truth of real life.

Happy now?

Focus.




Focus50 -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/21/2011 3:47:27 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarqueMirror

The other thing he conveniently overlooks...

The other thing he conveniently overlooks is the depraved indifference to suffering and loss of life inherent in a mindset that wants to see millions of innocent human beings deprived of any adequate means of defending themselves in a too often imperfect world.

K.



I guess you conveniently overlooked that "at close range" estimate for your hand cannon, huh? Embarrassing, perhaps?

<braces for a torrent of technical gobbledygook>

Focus.




DeviantlyD -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/21/2011 3:51:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

I like to think of them as loved ones with teeth.



Does this mean that your "other" loved ones don't have teeth? *blinks innocently*

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

"A Gwinnett county woman shot and killed a home invasion suspect Wednesday morning after the knife-wielding intruder attacked her in the shower, police said."


So she what? Had gun on a rope?


*snort* Oh that was bad. :D


quote:

ORIGINAL: zenny

You ever bother to look into stats relating to how many crimes per year a firearm helps stop?

It's always nice to read about a firearm being used properly. Too bad it's considered uncouth to report such things. It's also too bad that it will be another +1 for the firearm death statistic for this year that so many like to erroneously use.



Since you mentioned statistics, why didn't you just go ahead and provide a reference?

Geez louise...I'm only on page 2! I don't think I have the attention span to get through the rest.




Focus50 -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/21/2011 3:58:40 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WyldHrt
WTF can't I go grocery shopping at 10PM on Saturday night in Brisbane?? [:D]

Geeezus woman, 'cept for the odd public holiday, you can grocery shop 12-16 hours a day, every day of the year here - and we're barely a quarter the size of Brisbane. And the yellow pages will point you to the stores that trade 24/7. All you hafta do is get yourself organised...! ;)

Focus.




DeviantlyD -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/21/2011 4:12:53 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

So you would force a person to live against their will ?

T^T


This is unbelievably offensive.




Focus50 -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/21/2011 4:17:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Focus50



quote:

I disagree. It was stupid and useless. The only thing your government succeeded in doing is disarming law abiding citizens of common semi autos, that is assuming they all turned them in which I highly doubt. I also doubt the crooks disarmed or that they resort to only shooting them at gun clubs. Your government deserves criticism for banning them as do those in our government who want to ban them. Though why should I care what happens over there ?  It's non of my bees wax. Why is it you care so much about what we do over here ?

For what it's worth, I largely agree with what you're disagreeing with me about.....

As for why I care about what happens in the US, I don't - same as you about here. I'm here responding to a discussion topic is all....

Ok, it's drifted quite a bit since and I actually don't mind misery (and death) befalling those knowingly doing the wrong thing, such as in the OP. But the irony wasn't lost on me, either - the self-defeating cause and consequence of the 2nd Amendment....

Focus.



Let me see if I understand you here. Your largely disagree with your self ? Or are you beginning to sort of change your mind about what you may have thought about the private ownership of guns.

Lol, wouldn't that just make your day!

Let's see - our "government succeeded in doing is disarming law abiding citizens of common semi autos".
Check - agree.

"that is assuming they all turned them in which I highly doubt".
I certainly know of at least one that didn't get turned in (Shhhh!), so check - agree.

"I also doubt the crooks disarmed or that they resort to only shooting them at gun clubs".
I doubt that, too - check, agree again.

"Your government deserves criticism for banning them as do those in our government who want to ban them."
Partially agree (criticism) - that your government could do a lot more on the type of arms your citizens have a right to bear. You simply don't need heavy, full auto firepower to defend yourself - you *don't*! Or probably half the stuff available in the average gun store....

Focus.




lovmuffin -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/21/2011 11:39:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Focus50


[
"Your government deserves criticism for banning them as do those in our government who want to ban them."
Partially agree (criticism) - that your government could do a lot more on the type of arms your citizens have a right to bear. You simply don't need heavy, full auto firepower to defend yourself - you *don't*! Or probably half the stuff available in the average gun store....

Focus.





I don't know what you mean that our government could do a lot more on the types of arms our citizens have a right to bear.  We do not have have access to* full auto* firepower just by going to the gun store and picking one up. The only heavy stuff would be semi auto or heavy duty (that meaning extra durable). Heavy could mean a lot of things and even pertain to other non semi automatic guns too.




  Private ownership of a machine gun (full auto) requires a permit, a tax to be paid and quite an extensive background check by the FBI. To possess one illegally would be in violation of federal laws and likely state laws as well. This would cause you some major shit if caught with one and highly likely you would face jail time.  It's not something I would want to mess with so I wouldn't touch one without a permit or unless I was with someone who owns it legally. 


 




WyldHrt -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/21/2011 1:13:32 PM)

quote:

which is why there's probably a gun shop in every other shopping mall in the US.

Yep, right between Victoria's Secret and Sees Candies. Do you really believe this? LOL

Also, you seem to have missed my post responding to your theory on the right to bear arms. It's post #218 [;)]




Focus50 -> RE: Private firearms ownership saves another homeowner (5/21/2011 2:02:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

I don't know what you mean that our government could do a lot more on the types of arms our citizens have a right to bear. 

Private ownership of a machine gun (full auto) requires a permit, a tax to be paid and quite an extensive background check by the FBI. To possess one illegally would be in violation of federal laws and likely state laws as well. This would cause you some major shit if caught with one and highly likely you would face jail time.  It's not something I would want to mess with so I wouldn't touch one without a permit or unless I was with someone who owns it legally. 


Yanno, I've been a sport but there comes a point where I get tired of banging my head against a wall. You're a talker, not a listener.

You seriously don't know what I mean about the types of weapons available and then tell me all about how a permit and FBI check etc is required to buy your (presumably) home defense machine gun! A freakin' machine gun, for cryin' out loud?

I'm happy to discuss most things with practically anyone here - but you have to try, too!

One last try but.... When we talk of "heavy weapons", we're not talking weight especially but stopping power from the business end. Usually a combination of calibre, muzzle velocity, rate of fire etc, But ok, if your gun packs all 3 then it's probably a physically heavy weapon, too.

Focus.




Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.201172E-02