KenDckey
Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: angelikaJ quote:
ORIGINAL: EternalHoH quote:
ORIGINAL: KenDckey Although I believe it does not violate the constitution for the doctor to ask, I also don't believe that he has a right to know. For the purposes of pediatric care, he does not have a right to know if the parents keep guns in their house. He can ask, and the parents can refuse to answer. Thats what should have happened here, except the woman took exception to 'feeling bad'. The doctor does have a right to know if the parents carry guns onto his private property, into his office building. The doctor does have the right to control his private property, and institute a 'no guns on premises' rule if he so desires. If the patient disagrees, they can stay home (and off his property), or find another doctor. Once they set foot inside the front door of his office, the patient is now governed by the doctor's rules. But because this woman 'felt bad', the NRA got involved, and now, private property owners in Florida have a less control over their private property. quote:
ORIGINAL: KenDckey To me, this is the first step in saying that all gun owners are unfit parents. I'm sure if there is any evaluation of parental fitness and/or patient suitability going on, its not just over a gun. Only the 'second amendment paranoids' would think that a gun drives everything. quote:
ORIGINAL: KenDckey So they pick on one issue that has been determined to be allowed according to the constitution. Isn't that profiling? For all we know, the receptionist may have spotted a gun in her purse when the woman grabbed her wallet or insurance cards. If the doc had a no-carry policy on his property, and she violated that, it would explain the gun-as-conversation and the booting. There are plenty of possible reasons, unknown to us, before we ever land on 'profiling'. There are some very big extrapolations being made here. He asked a question. It was a routine question, something he hasbeen asking the last couple of years. There is nothing to suggest she was carrying, nor was there anything to suggest that he believed gun owners to be unfit parents. Okonkwo told the Star-Banner he asked Ullman about whether she had a gun in her home because of the safety of her children, and told her so. He said he asks such questions of all his patients so he can advise parents to lock their guns away from children. "I don't tell them to get rid of the guns," he said. "The purpose is to give advice." He said that more than half the families he treats have guns. So his is maintaining statistics. hmmmmmmm
|