RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


TheCabal -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 6:35:57 PM)

quote:


Of course it was. You just didnt realize how stupid your post was, even in a sarcastic way.


Your opinion not withstanding, I'm still laughing at you.

quote:

Again, your proof.. which we both know you do not have. [;)]


Because you won't accept the proof doesn't mean your words have disappeared.

quote:

But I prefer the term omnipotent, I like powerful men. Good thing you admitted lacking that.


Oh I'm sure you do prefer that term.  You know what?  I like the term "supercilious" but I wouldn't use it when what I mean to say is "vacuous." 

quote:

So who am I being bigoted against? Gays? Republicans? Those of the tea party?

Should I get just as mad if someone calls me a bra burner?

Can you connect those two ideas?


Would you be annoyed if you were a bra burner, and people who disagreed with you called you a "carpet muncher"?




tazzygirl -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 6:40:37 PM)

quote:

Would you be annoyed if you were a bra burner, and people who disagreed with you called you a "carpet muncher"?


Why would I be?




tazzygirl -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 6:43:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Funny I remember things being considered racist attacks when people said things like I disagree with him cause I think he is too far left.   Just cause you like how far left he is does not mean that I am racist when I don't.   Any disagreement with Obama has been met with cries of racism yet nobody has any problem with any insult aimed at Cain double standard ????   Obviously!


Show me where I have made such posts.




JstAnotherSub -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 6:44:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheCabal

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

How cons are trying to gain traction on race by featuring this black nut or Cornel West`s criticism of President Obama is telling.

Why all the focus on the guys racial make-up?

Why the need to?


You really have to ask that after we elected the current president based almost completely on his racial make up?  Or do you really want to try to make the case that a community organizing Senator from Illinois was better qualified and had more experience than either Hillary or McCain?



I really think Obama was elected because he was the lesser of the two evils we had to choose from. McCain had to know choosing Palin as his running mate was shooting him self in the foot.




thishereboi -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 6:45:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I find it interesting that the same people who claim any disagreement with a leftest black is dismissed as racism are the first ones to attack black conservatives as tokens Uncle Toms and race traitors.  They say that GOP needs to include more blacks but then says they don't count because they are GOP.  Only leftest think they can have it both ways.


I consider myself left leaning... show me where I have ever come close to saying anything like that.


What makes you think he is talking about you?




Hippiekinkster -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 6:47:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheCabal

Even when they use pejorative terms like "tea-bagger" and "Yukon Barbie."  It comes from never really engaging in any self-examination.  If you were capable of understanding why using 'tea-bagger' as a pejorative for Republicans is homophobic (and it is), you wouldn't have fallen into my trap.  Instead you've been drinking the liberal Kool Aid for so long, you've lost touch with even the left's own claimed beliefs about what's hateful and what isn't.  

By this logic, "cocksucker" and "assfucker" are homophobic as well. What a moronic statement.




tazzygirl -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 6:47:42 PM)

Oh boi.. its ALL about me... lol...

seriously, he left it a blanket statement for any leftist. since I am left leaning... I do include myself into that group on occassions, depending on the issue.




TheCabal -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 6:54:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Why would I be?


Well, perhaps because enlightened people understand that just because you support women's lib (bra burner), that does not automatically make you a lesbian (carpet muncher).  And that slurring you that way is hateful. 




TheCabal -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 6:57:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster

By this logic, "cocksucker" and "assfucker" are homophobic as well. What a moronic statement.


Aren't they?  How about if we just go for it and call the tea partiers a bunch of "faggots?"




tazzygirl -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 7:00:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheCabal

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Why would I be?


Well, perhaps because enlightened people understand that just because you support women's lib (bra burner), that does not automatically make you a lesbian (carpet muncher).  And that slurring you that way is hateful. 



But, you see, I have munched a few carpets in my time. So, no, it wouldn't bother me in the least. Then again, I don't worry too much about other peoples' opinions.

Its hard to be a slur when it comes from a place of ignorance.




TheCabal -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 7:01:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JstAnotherSub

I really think Obama was elected because he was the lesser of the two evils we had to choose from. McCain had to know choosing Palin as his running mate was shooting him self in the foot.


I can understand that if you're a Democrat and generally don't like Republican politics - and for all the same reasons it's ridiculous to ascribe racism to Republicans who don't like Obama's politics.

So was he the lesser of two evils in the 'Crat primaries when he was running against Hillary?  Keeping in mind I understand why he'd be the lesser of two evils against the ambulance chasing Edwards. 




OrionTheWolf -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 7:03:07 PM)

~FR~

Hermain Cain? Was this the area?

No wonder the mods hate coming in here, so many would get warnings and time outs for not being able to follow basic TOU and guidelines.




tazzygirl -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 7:09:56 PM)

You are correct, Master Orion.

http://www.scribd.com/full/54720250?access_key=key-116s073qo20a9wqx7gv4

This is what he says about the issues, such as immigration and energy.

I just feel, after reading it, he is sorta talking in circles.




Owner59 -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 8:14:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Funny I remember things being considered racist attacks when people said things like I disagree with him cause I think he is too far left.   Just cause you like how far left he is does not mean that I am racist when I don't.   Any disagreement with Obama has been met with cries of racism yet nobody has any problem with any insult aimed at Cain double standard ????   Obviously!


Maybe you should debate politics with different friends or grow a set.


One of the biggest fake outrage BS lines is "I can`t criticize Obama without being called racist"

If someone has a legit issue with say President Obama`s middle east policy,bring it on.

But calling someone an anti-Semite for supporting that policy ,for example,is gonna get you the shit-storm you deserve.Same with the death panel crap,birther smear campaigns or claiming the president is racially biased ie. the new black panther race baiting bullshit, you cons pulled recently.

The President has been very gracious and open to serious discussion.The GOP leadership has been anything but.

If cons had legit issues to discuss with the President, you cons wouldn`t stoop to using the non-issue distract/run/hide coward tactics.

So while you cry and whine,consider that serious discussions get serious replies,even here.Bullshit gets you shit in return.....all you want.




juliaoceania -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 8:17:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheCabal

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster

By this logic, "cocksucker" and "assfucker" are homophobic as well. What a moronic statement.


Aren't they?  How about if we just go for it and call the tea partiers a bunch of "faggots?"



I am a cocksucker, I see nothing insulting about that.




Owner59 -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 8:21:33 PM)

I`m a lesbian in a male body.......that explains my tendency to munch carpet.[8D]




juliaoceania -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 8:28:46 PM)

Really, being called a cocksucker is only offensive if a person thinks sucking cock is bad, or being gay is bad. If you do not think blow jobs are bad, and you do not think being gay is bad, why would it upset you to be called a cocksucker? I have been called a lesbian by right wingers on the internet on more than one occasions, it didn't bother me... it would be like calling me a brunette, or short. I am not a brunette and I am not short..




BitaTruble -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 8:33:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf


Didn't see you mention anything about the prebate, which is a check everyone gets to offset their taxes in this idea.


It's temporay though.. then that prebate goes away and reality sets in. It's a sparklie and no different from the sparklies we've gotten in the past. Checks are nice, but I'd just as soon not write even more of them when I'm already over drawn at the bank.

quote:

You are only taxed at the retail level, and some things such as foods would be exempt. The idea is that those people that pay $200 for a pair of sneakers will pay more tax than those that pay $20 at Wal Mart. This does not include capturing all the taxes from those that have jobs that do not report income; such as legal jobs where there are a lot of cash tips going on, to illegal jobs such as drug dealers, prostitution, etc. Those people will eventually need to spend that money, and get taxed, rather than now where they avoid taxes.


There is no incentive to spend for the working poor and no income to spend for the large % of out of work not to mention the homeless, so it is the middle class and upper class who will do the spending except there really is no effective middle class so the burden falls on the upper class to spend. And there is the crux of depending on a flat tax.. you are counting on people taking their money and spending it. It's a fine ideal but is it realistic when people are keeping their cards close to the vest? In all honesty, I do see the points regarding capturing money from the drug trade, prostitution etc., but a whole lot of that money goes right back into the purchase of drugs and such.. not into retail business. Oh, a lot of it will but what do you suppose drug dealers and the like who are making that 1 trillion a year are going to be buying? My bet is that its Rolex over Timex and you won't see a lot of bling at Ed & Marthas Retail Everything Emporium located in Podunk, Anystate.


quote:

You really did not give an accurate description of the 'Fair Tax", and I recommend anyone that wants more information go to fairtax.org.


I thought I was close enough for the question I was answering but, that said, I concur. Everyone should be doing their own homework. I was generalizing on why Cain will be a hard sell for me and how I took his remarks on lowering the debt.

quote:



If it is not something in the corporate interest, then it will be difficult to do. Have you seen any of his comments about corporations and PACS being involved in politics? I am not sure what his stance was on that.


I agree with you 100%. I have not seen his comments on those two issues nor the issues which are deal breakers for me. There just isn't a ton of information out there on him yet but I like his background for sure. His dad worked three jobs so their children could get an opportunity. Kudo's to them and to him for taking that opportunity and running with it. I admire that and, to me, *that* is the American spirit in action. Hard sell.. but, door is not closed. Character is very weighty with me. Something which I found in both McCain and Obama and which I found lacking in their running mates. Cains choice in that matter also matters to me, but that's a whole long way off.



quote:

Until we cut the puppet strings of the corporations, I do not see much of a difference in who is in there, except in very small differences.

Cain would likely be just another corparitist, just like most other politicians are.


Possibly, but right now my job is to vet and be as sure as I can be, to listen to what others have to say so I can add their perceptions to my own and try to get as rounded a view as possible. Beyond that it's hard to say until I'm done with my job. Puppet strings.. seems like my endeavor is futile, but I am a masochist so it's all good. [:D]




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 8:39:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania
Really, being called a cocksucker is only offensive if a person thinks sucking cock is bad, or being gay is bad. If you do not think blow jobs are bad, and you do not think being gay is bad, why would it upset you to be called a cocksucker? I have been called a lesbian by right wingers on the internet on more than one occasions, it didn't bother me... it would be like calling me a brunette, or short. I am not a brunette and I am not short..

K so Julia, you're a short brunette cocksucking/blow-jobbing lesbian! Offended? "No", well good then. [:D]

The above is not to offend but to illustrate that it is not simply an issue of whether a given person doesn't mind the word but how the word is said, and by whom as in the intention if it was to offend or not. If a homophobe screams "faggot" at a homosexual then it is a very different experience to being OK with the word normally being used. A person could say "hello" in an ugly way and it could cause offense.




Owner59 -> RE: The trouble with Herman Cain (5/22/2011 8:43:35 PM)

The bottom line,literally,is no amount of tax policy tweaking is going to produce revenue out of thin air.

If we`re going to spend the money,the bill must be payed,no matter what.Either through collecting the enough tax to cover our bills or spend less.




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875