MarcEsadrian -> RE: True False or relative? (5/24/2011 2:29:34 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Idealynnbliss I am very new to this "scene" And I am curious about a statement made to me in response to my request to learn how to Dom a man. "You cant Dom a man if You cant Dom a female!" This statement, I'm assuming, implies that female is less than male, and therefore the ability to dominate a female serves as a preliminary litmus test in one's ability to dominate a male. In my experience, comparing the tractability of the sexes in a simple hierarchic scale like that is too one-dimensional. Male and female, each respective to their aggregate archetypes, are two different "systems" biologically and socially, presenting thus two different castles to storm. Each sex (generally) has their own gimmicks, strengths and weaknesses. Then there is individual intellect and persona to account for beyond this, which complicates matters further. I have no doubt the one you are quoting has "dommed" a female. Whether he has actually dominated a female is something I question. Women can be very complex, manipulative and subversive, once you buff away the veneer of their supposed docility—a veneer more than one woman has used as a mask in beguiling a man with an easily fluffed ego. Be warned, all ye who are so assuming; therein surely lies your Achilles heel. "If you go to women, don't forget the whip." —Nietzsche
|
|
|
|