RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


willbeurdaddy -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/30/2011 1:28:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

Arguing that the universe doesnt exist unless there is a consciousness to observe it fits nicely with your creationist views, so at least you are consistently illogical



Not just creationists views...it fits quite nicely with spontaneous creation views as well. In fact it fits all views that I can see. All the theories that I know of start from nothing to everything spontaneously. It is the before …trigger and mechanism that is in question.

Butch



No, it doesnt. Under big bang theories, regardless of the cause of the big bang, it takes billions of years for consciousness to develp, not at the time of creation.




kdsub -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/30/2011 1:31:48 PM)

And you know this how?

If you don’t know what was before…or at the time of creation…how can you know if a consciousness existed?..I can't and don't know but I leave room for all possibilities

Butch




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/30/2011 1:34:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

And you know this how?


How do I know that is what the theories say? Decades of reading and a brief stint as a Physics major.

Or how do I know the theories are correct? I don't, nobody does, but they actually offer an explanation that is consistent with physics, math and the observed universe. "God" doesnt.




kdsub -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/30/2011 1:39:31 PM)

So you know....what was before the big bang

You know what triggered the big bang

You know how the big bang worked

You know for a fact there was no consciousness before or during the big bang?

You know the origin and progression of life and consciousness in all the infinite universe?

You should write a book…wow… some physics class you got there.

Butch




rulemylife -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/30/2011 1:53:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

I've banged a couple big girls.

Wait........is that was this thread is about?



Origins

I speak in two

sometimes    one grows from many
sometimes    many splits from one

two    the birth of deathly life
two    the leaving off

birth    the union of all makes and kills
leaving off    strips and is stripped

when deathly life divides itself
exchanges never cease

sometimes    through Love everything grows into one
sometimes    through Hate everyone splits into two

--------------

Fire and Water and Earth and the unfilled measure of Air

Hate Hated twice by the roots equals them
Love that's in them becomes their friend by the length and width

mind, look at her
don't sit there eyes astounded

born in their bodies
men worship her

she makes them think of desire
doing what joins them in peace and friendship

so they call her JOYOUS JOINER
Gethosyne           Aphrodite

no one alive has seen her
because she swirls in their eyes

all the roots are equal
the same in birth and age

ruling with different honor
each according to their nature
--------------

Excerpts from Empedocles, From Nature
c. 800 B.C.



Does all that mean I can go find another big girl to bang?




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/30/2011 4:47:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

So you know....what was before the big bang

You know what triggered the big bang

You know how the big bang worked

You know for a fact there was no consciousness before or during the big bang?

You know the origin and progression of life and consciousness in all the infinite universe?

You should write a book…wow… some physics class you got there.

Butch


I know what the theories are, and can actually logically connect them. Apparently all you can do is snark. Nothing new.




Kirata -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/30/2011 8:33:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

As far as the near death experiences...

You'll excuse me for observing that when you encounter repeated evidence of consciousness under carefully monitored conditions when the brain is not functioning, continuing to insist that consciousness depends on brain function rings a bit hollow.

K.




kdsub -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/30/2011 9:03:14 PM)

quote:

I know what the theories are, and can actually logically connect them


Thats news no one else claims to have connected them...I don't mean to be snarky really...we will just have to admit we will not change the others mind.

Butch




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/30/2011 9:13:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

As far as the near death experiences...

You'll excuse me for observing that when you encounter repeated evidence of consciousness under carefully monitored conditions when the brain is not functioning, continuing to insist that consciousness depends on brain function rings a bit hollow.

K.



I would agree...what is that repeated evidence?




lickenforyou -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/30/2011 10:24:28 PM)

quote:

repeated evidence of consciousness
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

As far as the near death experiences...

You'll excuse me for observing that when you encounter repeated evidence of consciousness under carefully monitored conditions when the brain is not functioning, continuing to insist that consciousness depends on brain function rings a bit hollow.

K.



I'd love to see an example of that.




Kirata -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/30/2011 11:14:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

I would agree...what is that repeated evidence?

No one physiological or psychological model by itself explains all the common features of NDE. The paradoxical occurrence of heightened, lucid awareness and logical thought processes during a period of impaired cerebral perfusion raises particular perplexing questions for our current understanding of consciousness and its relation to brain function. A clear sensorium and complex perceptual processes during a period of apparent clinical death challenge the concept that consciousness is localized exclusively in the brain. ~Greyson B. "Incidence and correlates of near-death experiences in a cardiac care unit." Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2003;25:269-276.

The data suggest that the NDE arises during unconsciousness. This is a surprising conclusion, because when the brain is so dysfunctional that the patient is deeply comatose, the cerebral structures, which underpin subjective experience and memory, must be severely impaired. Complex experiences such as are reported in the NDE should not arise or be retained in memory. Such patients would be expected to have no subjective experience ~Parnia S, Waller DG, Yeates R, Fenwick P. "A qualitative and quantitative study of the incidence, features and aetiology of near death experiences in cardiac arrest survivors." Resuscitation 2001;48:149-156.

Our results show that medical factors cannot account for occurrence of NDE; although all patients had been clinically dead, most did not have NDE. Furthermore, seriousness of the crisis was not related to occurrence or depth of the experience. If purely physiological factors resulting from cerebral anoxia caused NDE, most of our patients should have had this experience. Patients’ medication was also unrelated to frequency of NDE... How could a clear consciousness outside one’s body be experienced at the moment that the brain no longer functions during a period of clinical death with flat EEG? ~van Lommel P, van Wees R, Meyers V, Elfferich, I. "Near-death experience in survivors of cardiac arrest: a prosepctive study in the Netherlands." Lancet 2001;358:2039-2045.

K.




lickenforyou -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/31/2011 12:28:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

I would agree...what is that repeated evidence?

No one physiological or psychological model by itself explains all the common features of NDE. The paradoxical occurrence of heightened, lucid awareness and logical thought processes during a period of impaired cerebral perfusion raises particular perplexing questions for our current understanding of consciousness and its relation to brain function. A clear sensorium and complex perceptual processes during a period of apparent clinical death challenge the concept that consciousness is localized exclusively in the brain. ~Greyson B. "Incidence and correlates of near-death experiences in a cardiac care unit." Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2003;25:269-276.

The data suggest that the NDE arises during unconsciousness. This is a surprising conclusion, because when the brain is so dysfunctional that the patient is deeply comatose, the cerebral structures, which underpin subjective experience and memory, must be severely impaired. Complex experiences such as are reported in the NDE should not arise or be retained in memory. Such patients would be expected to have no subjective experience ~Parnia S, Waller DG, Yeates R, Fenwick P. "A qualitative and quantitative study of the incidence, features and aetiology of near death experiences in cardiac arrest survivors." Resuscitation 2001;48:149-156.

Our results show that medical factors cannot account for occurrence of NDE; although all patients had been clinically dead, most did not have NDE. Furthermore, seriousness of the crisis was not related to occurrence or depth of the experience. If purely physiological factors resulting from cerebral anoxia caused NDE, most of our patients should have had this experience. Patients’ medication was also unrelated to frequency of NDE... How could a clear consciousness outside one’s body be experienced at the moment that the brain no longer functions during a period of clinical death with flat EEG? ~van Lommel P, van Wees R, Meyers V, Elfferich, I. "Near-death experience in survivors of cardiac arrest: a prosepctive study in the Netherlands." Lancet 2001;358:2039-2045.

K.



I don't think enough is known about the brain to call NDEs during a flat EEG evidence, Dig a corpse up after six months and he tells the same story, then I'll believe it.




Kirata -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/31/2011 1:14:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

I don't think enough is known about the brain to call NDEs during a flat EEG evidence, Dig a corpse up after six months and he tells the same story, then I'll believe it.

Well we know at least enough about the brain to know that a response like that isn't evidence of one.

K.




mnottertail -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/31/2011 7:00:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

lol... You have stated it better than me in all the posts I've written.

Butch


Well, there is an intangible sort of property to conciousness, but it has a physical property as well.  

I mean, there aint many here who couldn't walk down the line, saying, hes in, hes out.....like the color green (which is same, intangible-tangible thing) give you some examples and hope you catch on, but I can send to normal humans in separate rooms, and they both are going to pick out green. And the quick from the dead.

English is a rich and wonderful language, but there's just some things it ain't built for. 




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/31/2011 7:57:49 AM)

K...I will look for those to read them in depth, but this is particularly striking:

"Our results show that medical factors cannot account for occurrence of NDE; although all patients had been clinically dead, most did not have NDE. Furthermore, seriousness of the crisis was not related to occurrence or depth of the experience. If purely physiological factors resulting from cerebral anoxia caused NDE, most of our patients should have had this experience."

There is a thread here where TheHeretic's thoughts were twisted and then ridiculed, to the effect of "lack of scandal means there must be scandals". This smacks of the same reasoning "most not having NDEs must mean that NDEs are caused by something non-physiological". If that is the depth of reasoning in that study, I have little hope there is anything particularly revealing in it.




mnottertail -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/31/2011 8:06:18 AM)

It is called hasty generalization.

A demonstration by gedanken experiment.




Three scientists ride the train from Glasgow to London.

While still in Soctland the first man, an astronomer; seeing a sheep out the window exclaims, "Look, all the sheep in Scotland are black!"

The second, a mathematician, sipping his ice cold Jameson adjures, "There is one
sheep in Scotland that is known to be black."

The third, a physicist, puffs langoriously upon his pipe, and with a deep sigh
intones, "There exists at least one sheep in Scotland, of which one side appears to be
black, when viewed from a moving train, from some distance."




kdsub -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/31/2011 8:23:01 AM)

And the Republican says “ Damn look at that ass”

And the Democrat says to the Republican…” You Taliban Nazi pig I’ll bet you would rather have a white sheep”

Butch




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/31/2011 12:35:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

I would agree...what is that repeated evidence?

No one physiological or psychological model by itself explains all the common features of NDE. The paradoxical occurrence of heightened, lucid awareness and logical thought processes during a period of impaired cerebral perfusion raises particular perplexing questions for our current understanding of consciousness and its relation to brain function. A clear sensorium and complex perceptual processes during a period of apparent clinical death challenge the concept that consciousness is localized exclusively in the brain. ~Greyson B. "Incidence and correlates of near-death experiences in a cardiac care unit." Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2003;25:269-276.

The data suggest that the NDE arises during unconsciousness. This is a surprising conclusion, because when the brain is so dysfunctional that the patient is deeply comatose, the cerebral structures, which underpin subjective experience and memory, must be severely impaired. Complex experiences such as are reported in the NDE should not arise or be retained in memory. Such patients would be expected to have no subjective experience ~Parnia S, Waller DG, Yeates R, Fenwick P. "A qualitative and quantitative study of the incidence, features and aetiology of near death experiences in cardiac arrest survivors." Resuscitation 2001;48:149-156.

Our results show that medical factors cannot account for occurrence of NDE; although all patients had been clinically dead, most did not have NDE. Furthermore, seriousness of the crisis was not related to occurrence or depth of the experience. If purely physiological factors resulting from cerebral anoxia caused NDE, most of our patients should have had this experience. Patients’ medication was also unrelated to frequency of NDE... How could a clear consciousness outside one’s body be experienced at the moment that the brain no longer functions during a period of clinical death with flat EEG? ~van Lommel P, van Wees R, Meyers V, Elfferich, I. "Near-death experience in survivors of cardiac arrest: a prosepctive study in the Netherlands." Lancet 2001;358:2039-2045.

K.



Lancet appears to be down. The other two have nothing to do with controlled studies of NDE's.




Kirata -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/31/2011 6:13:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

"If purely physiological factors resulting from cerebral anoxia caused NDE, most of our patients should have had this experience."

"most not having NDEs must mean that NDEs are caused by something non-physiological". If that is the depth of reasoning...

Speaking of depths... I believe a correct reading of the statement (assuming it's in English) would be that if factors resulting from anoxia caused NDEs, one would expect to see a lot more of them.

I hope this isn't an indication of the way you're going to play this.

K.




lickenforyou -> RE: Before the Big Bang: looking back in time - Parallel Universes - BBC science (5/31/2011 7:38:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

I don't think enough is known about the brain to call NDEs during a flat EEG evidence, Dig a corpse up after six months and he tells the same story, then I'll believe it.

Well we know at least enough about the brain to know that a response like that isn't evidence of one.

K.



We also know that copying and pasting portions of a few studies doesn't make you the "thinker" that you seem to believe you are. If you were you would understand the intention of the statement instead of getting caught up in the exaggeration for effect part.




Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.701233E-02