Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Sex and Psychiatry ?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? - 6/2/2011 3:03:01 PM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OwnedFemaleFlesh
Actually my post applies equally to both sides of the profession. The medical side of psychiatry is as bad, if not worse, than than 'talking cure' side, if only because talking causes limited damage. Lobotomies and electric shock treatment never cured anything, and neither will the latest batch of treatments. Psychiatrists prescribe medicine to people who have never been shown to suffer from any physical illness, and without that medicine having been proven to cure any physical illness. It is dangerous and profit driven, and just as unscientific as the psychological side of psychiatry.

owned xxx



This is absolute bull. Comparing attempts made nearly a 100 years ago when there was no knowledge of how the brain worked to today when MRIs and Cat scans show the physical changes in the brain of people with and without illnesses.

The brain is a physical organ, for your information. Giving medication that stops seizures in the brain of an epileptic is as effective as giving the same medication to a Bipolar Type II who then stops having  violent mood swings. Try doing some research on neurobiology instead of spewing this nonsense.


_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to OwnedFemaleFlesh)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? - 6/2/2011 3:23:44 PM   
sirsholly


Posts: 42360
Joined: 9/7/2007
From: Quietville
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP

quote:

ORIGINAL: OwnedFemaleFlesh
Actually my post applies equally to both sides of the profession. The medical side of psychiatry is as bad, if not worse, than than 'talking cure' side, if only because talking causes limited damage. Lobotomies and electric shock treatment never cured anything, and neither will the latest batch of treatments. Psychiatrists prescribe medicine to people who have never been shown to suffer from any physical illness, and without that medicine having been proven to cure any physical illness. It is dangerous and profit driven, and just as unscientific as the psychological side of psychiatry.

owned xxx



This is absolute bull. Comparing attempts made nearly a 100 years ago when there was no knowledge of how the brain worked to today when MRIs and Cat scans show the physical changes in the brain of people with and without illnesses.

The brain is a physical organ, for your information. Giving medication that stops seizures in the brain of an epileptic is as effective as giving the same medication to a Bipolar Type II who then stops having  violent mood swings.

Thank you Celeste...well said.
quote:


Try doing some research on neurobiology instead of spewing this nonsense.

I want to suggest Neuropsychology as well, but with the obvious bias OwnedFemaleFlesh has against this field of medicine i seriously doubt anything will penetrate her ignorance.


_____________________________

PICKED UPON
TECHNO-DOLT
MEMBER OF THE SUBBIE MAFIA
GRACEFULLY CHALLENGED :::::splat:::::
BOOT WHORE
VAA/S FAN

GIVES GOOD HEART (Lushy)

CREATOR OF MAYHEM (practice)


(in reply to DesFIP)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? - 6/2/2011 3:59:29 PM   
ResidentSadist


Posts: 12580
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: a mean old Daddy, but I like you - Joni Mitchell
Status: offline
Seems you raised two issues.  The moral right to study, draw and publish conclusions about human sexuality and what the government can do through the courts about those conclusions.  

I think science has the right to study and publish its findings about human sexuality.  I see no moral violation there. 
I think the courts/law can kiss my ass. 




_____________________________

-=BDSM Book List=- Reading is Fundamental !!!
I give good thread.


(in reply to Aneirin)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? - 6/2/2011 6:38:11 PM   
uncertainlyizzy


Posts: 42
Joined: 4/11/2011
Status: offline
The long term treatment of any illness be it physical or mental has generally been explained to me as being about quality of life. You doctors are concerned with improving your quality of life or if that is not currently possible then maintaining it. If you don't feel your doc is concerned with that? Fire them. Additionally, I'm not sure you are understanding the difference between the function and use of a psychiatrist and a psychologist. The number of psychiatrists who do any form of talk therapy is slim to none. They discuss and give counsel on and prescribe medications. You want to talk about your childhood? Talk to your psychologist. You want to talk about the hallucinations the are being caused by a chemical imbalance and how you could possibly bring things back into sync? Talk to your psychiatrist. They're not interchangeable.

(in reply to ResidentSadist)
Profile   Post #: 24
Holy response, Batman! - 6/2/2011 7:37:17 PM   
strangedesire


Posts: 360
Joined: 12/23/2008
Status: offline
I found this OP so confusing that I had to break it into tiny pieces to process it. OP, I'm not even arguing with you for the most part, just trying to figure out what you're saying.

quote:

vast tracts of psychiatric papers and reports on the subject of sexual perversions


I'm not certain what "papers" and "reports" refer to. Credible psychiatrists are going to be publishing in either peer-reviewed journals or books. So are these case studies? Peer-reviewed theoretical work? APA recommended training materials? Experiments and analysis?

Likewise, "sexual perversions" isn't a term that shows up in modern psychiatric or psychological research. Honestly, what you're refering to sounds like either fuzzy summaries of legitimate work, weird sub-schools of psychoanalysis that most professionals will never run into, or work that is at least fifty years out of date.

Regardless, I'm not sure who, exactly, you're objecting to, which complicates things.

quote:

what moral right do these people have to comment on the sexual practices of others ?


You seem to be implying here that it is immoral for them to comment on your sexual practices. Do you expect them to stop doing this because of your moral beliefs? I doubt that you will stop engaging in the kind of sex you like simply because others believe it immoral.

If you expect people to to stop talking about the sex lives of others for moral reasons, you are more optimistic about human nature than I.

quote:

they are just theories, no hard and fast facts, so I question their value.


I question the value of football. This doesn't mean that football should not exist. If I wanted to end institutionalized football, I would need to find reasons to do so other than the fact that I see no value in it. Is it harmful? Is it bad? If so, why is its lack of value relevant?

quote:

But, I suppose, if we were to live in an ideal world, people and their perversions would be seen as just part of life, the live and let live scenario, but it seems we do not live in that idyll and we have a so called learned profession delving into the intimacies of others, perhaps even themselves via others, and that as I became aware a while in the past, many of the psychiatric profession possess psychiatric problems themselves and one whom I knew even said they entered the profession to understand themself, but is failing in that, as others are not themselves.


Why is this one sentence? There are at least three ideas here. Does each not deserve its own full stop?

quote:

if we were to live in an ideal world, people and their perversions would be seen as just part of life, the live and let live scenario


How are "people and their perversions" not seen as "part of life?" Do you mean to say that ideally, a large variety of sexual practices would be accepted as normal? Or is this ideal more a freedom from judgement?

quote:

we have a so called learned profession delving into the intimacies of others


I believe the subtext I'm reading here is that it is bad for people to look into the intimate lives of others. (Or are you being too coy to say sexual practices?) This is not something that you will find universal agreement for. There are a lot of researchers, and people who read research with interest, who believe that human sexuality is a valid area of study. You will actually have to argue this point before you can stand on it.

It strikes me, also, this this is a strange critique to post on a message board dedicated to talking about and exploring human sexuality.

quote:

many of the psychiatric profession possess psychiatric problems themselves and one whom I knew even said they entered the profession to understand themself


Ad hominem. The motivations of a researcher may shed light on her conclusions, but is not sufficient to overturn them. Also, I think, mostly an old wives' tale. There are people with mental problems in psychiatry, but there are people with mental problems everywhere else, too. I have seen no research to indicate that the ratios are different. If you have, please, share! But don't fall back on hearsay.

quote:

my personal understanding of sexual perversion in myself is it is a question that needs and answer, so I may do what I do to gain that answer and then move onto the next question


You have questions. You want answers. Once you have found these answers, you will move on. So far so good.

I am not, however, certain how this is different from what you criticized psychiatrists for doing a paragraph ago.

quote:

a lot of that has to do with my self defined spirituality


A lot of your search for answers? A lot of your willingness to move on once you find them? A lot of your sexuality itself?

quote:

If I do not arrive at a satisfactory conclusion, the question takes a different method of approach and that I see as my evolving interests


This does not yet make any sense. If you led with the context of the next bit, it might.

quote:

whatever answer there is to be obtained, will be obtained in the best method possible, that of enjoyment and pleasure


You're framing enjoyment and pleasure as a search for answers. Evolving sexual interests are a shift in the ways you search for those answers.

What is the question? I had thought that you were asking where your "perversions" came from, but engaging in them seems like a strange way to do this? Am I misreading you? If not, how does this work? Should it work for everyone, or only for you?

quote:

Sexual perversion I view as the games adults play in order to well basically enjoy themselve


I agree. Not sure how this fits in with the previous paragraph.

quote:

all work and no play makes jack a dull boy and dull in many ways, which can lead to problems the psych profession will be interested in


Quoting the crazed killer from The Shining is either a poor tactical choice or a brilliant cultural reference. I'm not sure which, yet.

You seem to be implying that a lack of play (earlier defined as "sexual perversion") leads to psychiatric problems. This seems, perhaps, a bit extreme. Or is sex one of many types of play that can help to prevent psychiatric problems? That seems more reasonable.

quote:

But also in that play is learning, for we need to learn and evolve as a result of that learning.


Kinky sex helps us learn and evolve! I'm totally with you on this as long as you don't go all Darwinian.

quote:

But the impression I am arriving at is that the psych profession is seeking to define people based upon just happen to fit theories and theories that have no answer except uppers, downers and further analysis under duress


I'm going to go backwards on this one:

quote:

theories that have no answer except uppers, downers and further analysis under duress


There's a lot more to psychiatric medicine than uppers and downers, but I'll let that lie. What I'm hearing is that the theories give rise to diagnoses, but the only solutions to these diagnoses are drugs and forced therapy. Even if this was true (in the US, I'm not aware of any drugs used to treat alternative sexualities) I'm not sure that a lack of treatment invalidates the diagnosis.

Have you had personal experinces with people in the psychiatric field that lead you to think this way? You, ah, write with someone like a thought disorder.

quote:

just happen to fit theories


Isn't that what a theory is? An explanation that happens to fit?

quote:

the psych profession is seeking to define people


"Pathologizing normal variety" is a better argument, in my opinion.

quote:

what the courts can do on the advice from the psychiatric profession


There's an argument to be made here. Feel free to make it.

quote:

does psychiatry have a valid moral right to be delving into the sexual perversions of people, or are they overstepping their duties?


"Moral right" and "duty" are very much different concepts. I have a right to free speech, but that doesn't make it my duty to say everything.


_____________________________

On that other site as Exegesis.

(in reply to Aneirin)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Holy response, Batman! - 6/2/2011 8:47:37 PM   
hematitan


Posts: 49
Joined: 6/25/2010
Status: offline
Psychiatry isn't perfect by any means, and I think the classification of psychiatric disorders is definitely culturally relative to some extent. However, psychiatry can also do a lot of good, and as others have brought up, clinical sadism, masochism, and other paraphilias are not generally the same as what most kinky people enjoy and indulge in. Generally, there's a requirement that the desires or behavior be extreme and uncontrollable, and/or cause distress in the person experiencing them. Someone who enjoys phone sex with their partner is probably not going to be diagnosed with a disorder and shouldn't be. Someone who's compelled to make obscene phone calls to complete strangers, and can't control the impulse, would be.

It's also worth noting that the DSM's list of psychosexual disorders isn't limited to paraphilias.

That's not to say that no psychiatrist would ever think a happy and healthy kinkster was mentally ill. Psychiatrists are human and can be subject to their biases and ignorance. But I don't think the average kinkster is who's being targeted by the DSM or the psychiatric community as a whole.

Also, not sure what types of papers and studies you mean, but sometimes research is done without passing judgment. Someone might want to study kink without necessarily associating it with mental illness. And while it's always a little cringe-worthy when people try to understand us (whether in regards to kink or anything else), I don't think it's bad.

(in reply to strangedesire)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? - 6/2/2011 10:02:34 PM   
Arpig


Posts: 9930
Joined: 1/3/2006
From: Increasingly further from reality
Status: offline
quote:

Psychiatrists prescribe medicine to people who have never been shown to suffer from any physical illness, and without that medicine having been proven to cure any physical illness. It is dangerous and profit driven, and just as unscientific as the psychological side of psychiatry.
Total fucking bullshit!

It really pisses me off when people who don't know a thing about it spout off dangerous and idiotic opinions like this. Mental illnesses ARE real, and they are often physical in origin. And the medications work! You got that? They fucking well work!

I'm not talking theoretically, I'm talking my reality. If I don't take the pills my psychiatrist has prescribed for me all Hell breaks loose inside my head.

_____________________________

Big man! Pig Man!
Ha Ha...Charade you are!


Why do they leave out the letter b on "Garage Sale" signs?

CM's #1 All-Time Also-Ran


(in reply to OwnedFemaleFlesh)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? - 6/3/2011 1:38:37 AM   
OwnedFemaleFlesh


Posts: 182
Joined: 4/9/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP

quote:

ORIGINAL: OwnedFemaleFlesh
Actually my post applies equally to both sides of the profession. The medical side of psychiatry is as bad, if not worse, than than 'talking cure' side, if only because talking causes limited damage. Lobotomies and electric shock treatment never cured anything, and neither will the latest batch of treatments. Psychiatrists prescribe medicine to people who have never been shown to suffer from any physical illness, and without that medicine having been proven to cure any physical illness. It is dangerous and profit driven, and just as unscientific as the psychological side of psychiatry.

owned xxx



This is absolute bull. Comparing attempts made nearly a 100 years ago when there was no knowledge of how the brain worked to today when MRIs and Cat scans show the physical changes in the brain of people with and without illnesses.

The brain is a physical organ, for your information. Giving medication that stops seizures in the brain of an epileptic is as effective as giving the same medication to a Bipolar Type II who then stops having  violent mood swings. Try doing some research on neurobiology instead of spewing this nonsense.



With respect, DesFIP, I made no comment on neurobiology, nor was the question about that. MRI scans and the treatment of epilepsy are not performed by psychiatrists or psychologists and therefore are outside the remit of this question.

There is a clear divide between the science and accuracy of neurobiology and the lack of science and inaccuracy of psychiatry, which just makes my points all the clearer. I have never known anyone go to a psychiatrist and get a brain scan before being prescribed a medicine. Yet apparently, it is the brain they are treating.

owned xxx

(in reply to DesFIP)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? - 6/3/2011 1:51:41 AM   
OwnedFemaleFlesh


Posts: 182
Joined: 4/9/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

quote:

Psychiatrists prescribe medicine to people who have never been shown to suffer from any physical illness, and without that medicine having been proven to cure any physical illness. It is dangerous and profit driven, and just as unscientific as the psychological side of psychiatry.
Total fucking bullshit!

It really pisses me off when people who don't know a thing about it spout off dangerous and idiotic opinions like this. Mental illnesses ARE real, and they are often physical in origin. And the medications work! You got that? They fucking well work!

I'm not talking theoretically, I'm talking my reality. If I don't take the pills my psychiatrist has prescribed for me all Hell breaks loose inside my head.


You're entitled to your opinion on the theory of psychiatry, I'm entitled to mine. The people I know in my family and my friends with 'mental illnesses' have NEVER shown any improvement despite being prescribed all kinds of junk, in fact in many cases it make them worse. They do not 'fucking well work' You got that??!! I am entitled to question the science and accuracy of a medicine which fails to diagnose and cure people. I am also entitled to question a profession which labels and stigmatises people, and has the legal right to deprive them of their liberty on the basis of those labels. We are ALL entitled to question that. Psychiatry says that my sexuality is a paraphila, I say *that* is total fucking bullshit.

owned xxx

(in reply to Arpig)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? - 6/3/2011 3:29:08 AM   
Aneirin


Posts: 6121
Joined: 3/18/2006
From: Tamaris
Status: offline
Exactly, and that is what I in the OP asked for, other's oppinions, as each have their own validity and as I asked the question then it is for me to regard or disregard the answers given to me.What others may derive from the content of the thread is up to them, but I abhor this attacking stance on others who have a different oppinion.

Yes as all may be aware I have a particular disdain for psychiatrists and that because of past experiences both in a social setting, psychs(psychos) I have know as friends and psychiatrists in a doctor/patient scenario, the only one of which I questioned who was the patient as the psychiatrist rattled on about golf all the way through the session which bored me shitless, but somehow he came to the conclusion I had mild autism from that one session, but he was only there to qualify a previous psychoanalyst's diagnosis, the medical profession refusing to take the word of a lesser entity, they had to confirm themselves. The psychiatrists I knew as friends abused their privilages, self prescribing and drug/ alcohol abuse and one of them was the police psychiatrist which was particularly scary.

As to medications, well I have been on SSRI's for five years now and can quite honestly say all they do is round off the edges of life, oh and further deplete my natural ability to feel, life is monotonous, going through the motions day in day out with no highs and no lows.A mood stabiliser it is, but it does a good job at that, the trouble is I can't get off the things as I know it is responsible for preventing me from rejoining society in the world of work and life.

Talks with my doctor reveals my ailment will not go away, I have had it for life and it will remain for life, so my option is meds to round off the edges or go through the rapid mood shifts I used to experience, either has it's pro's and con's, but the feeling is for fuck's sake is it worth the effort knowing there will be no change.

But as SSRI's are being used more and more for more cases of illness than previously imagined, concern is forming in the depressive world at just what will be the future for these things, as problems are already coming to light, dependancy being one of them and other illnesses created, the suggestion is ten years from now they will be discontinued, when it is found although initially licensed for human use, the exact effects were not known, and it is the users who are the guinea pigs and all the time that is happening, big pharma is reaping dividends.

The odd thing is with me, it took a GP to prescribe mind altering drugs, not a psychiatric professional, I was treated for depression not knowing what the problem was, so just treating the symptoms and ignoring the cause seems to be de rigeur, years later came a diagnosis, and not by way of the medical profession, but a test for dyslexia.

So my apologies if people perceive I have a dim view of the medical profession, but that is gained from experience.

As to my sexual interests, that largely of a historical sm/humiliation aspect, although I am coy with my interests to the medics,but what little I have revealed they have suggested I seek what I seek because on my inability to feel, which could be it, but I have other ideas on that, much of which I have personally isolated from my past, the rabid questions formed in puberty at age 10 with no adult I could trust to confide in.


< Message edited by Aneirin -- 6/3/2011 3:36:22 AM >


_____________________________

Everything we are is the result of what we have thought, the mind is everything, what we think, we become - Guatama Buddha

Conservatism is distrust of people tempered by fear - William Gladstone

(in reply to OwnedFemaleFlesh)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? - 6/3/2011 6:17:18 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MarcEsadrian

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin
So, what are your views, does psychiatry have a valid moral right to be delving into the sexual perversions of people, or are they overstepping their duties ?


Freud and Krafft-Ebing left their mark not only on the world of psychology and psychoanalysis, but broader western culture's mores and beliefs about sexual pathology. Combined with the mental straight jacket of religious institutionalization, that one-two punch made common western culture sexually dysfunctional in many respects—a curse we are just only know gaining traction upon in shaking off a little, but old habits die hard. Prevailing attitudes and myths of normalcy dictate what is considered normal or abnormal, and truisms about "normalcy" in psychoanalysis cater to that reality. In that respect, if we really believe in notions of freedom and liberty for each human being, we cannot justify majority consensus limiting what we can or cannot do for our own personal happiness, so long as it does not cause suffering or duress for those unwilling or uninvolved. It is for this reason the surrounding mainstream must be continually prodded to change and expand its thinking, to the degree it doesn't feel the obligation to police bedroom practices.

Psychoanalysts have a valid intellectual right to delve into clear pathologies that dangerously threaten people, however. Alternative sexuality is hardly where I'd begin my search for the base causes of these behaviors, however.
Well said.

(in reply to MarcEsadrian)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? - 6/3/2011 6:32:47 AM   
sirsholly


Posts: 42360
Joined: 9/7/2007
From: Quietville
Status: offline
quote:

You're entitled to your opinion on the theory of psychiatry, I'm entitled to mine. The people I know in my family and my friends with 'mental illnesses' have NEVER shown any improvement despite being prescribed all kinds of junk
First...those medications are not "junk". As with any other PHYSICAL ORGAN MALFUNCTION the treatment is based on the best knowledge of the physician from diagnostics as well as from the patient as a historian. All fields of medicine are an inexact science. ALL.

Now...as to your family and friends. All present with mental illness and none demonstrate improvement. First...i do not believe this for an instant. Perhaps they are keeping their condition and progress from you because of your negative attitude. No doubt they want to hear your prejudice even less then most of us here. The bottom line with your friends and family....the common denominator is YOU. I also suggest your bias blinds you to their progress.




_____________________________

PICKED UPON
TECHNO-DOLT
MEMBER OF THE SUBBIE MAFIA
GRACEFULLY CHALLENGED :::::splat:::::
BOOT WHORE
VAA/S FAN

GIVES GOOD HEART (Lushy)

CREATOR OF MAYHEM (practice)


(in reply to OwnedFemaleFlesh)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? - 6/3/2011 7:28:00 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
As an institution, psychiatry has been and still is, prone to abuse.

Big diff between treating Bipolar and zonking kids out to make them easier to handle.

Again, what is "normal", as opposed to what is situationally normative, or desirable from a third party standpoint, is always a cogent issue, the latter is often mistaken for the former.

(in reply to sirsholly)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? - 6/5/2011 9:27:01 AM   
txurinal


Posts: 209
Joined: 9/26/2009
Status: offline
As a teenager, i found myself sexually aroused by fantasies of Bondage, discipline, submission, etc. As a young man i began to explore these desires by seeing professionals and learning through experience what i liked and did not like.

i found i get incredibly turned on by tight bondage, by having someone administer pain and discipline, by being ordered around and controlled by others. i found i have an intense hood fetish and feel most comfortable with what i am while wearing them.

As i was exploring these thing in the beginning, i thought well maybe this is not quite "normal". Perhaps i should seek psychiatric help to understand why i like these things. Then i thought, how would i rather spend my money, discussing why i am drawn to BDSM or enjoying BDSM. i chose the latter and through sites such as these, realize there is nothing mentally wrong with me as far as what i like and get off on sexually

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? - 6/5/2011 11:41:07 AM   
littlewonder


Posts: 15659
Status: offline
quote:

I have never known anyone go to a psychiatrist and get a brain scan before being prescribed a medicine. Yet apparently, it is the brain they are treating.


You'd be wrong once again.

Yup, every single time I went to a different psychiatrist they wanted me to get a full work up including mri's and cat scans by my physicians and anytime I visited my physician for my mental problems they gave me a full work up and then gave me a referral to a psychiatrist.

Maybe you and your family need new doctors.


(in reply to OwnedFemaleFlesh)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? - 6/5/2011 12:26:27 PM   
orchid77


Posts: 125
Joined: 5/20/2011
Status: offline
In my opinion, I think anyone in the mental health field should delve into the lifestyle/sexual perversions. Many people come into the lifestyle for many many reasons. Some with clear perspectives on it and others who come from damaging backgrounds using the lifestyle as a form of release. If researchers did not take a look at human behavior and how those behaviors may or may not impact our social environment- they are no longer learning or evolving. The views of the lifestyle or as you stated sexual perversion from the mental health community has changed due to research. Many clinicians are now offering services to lifestylers. So yes, I believe it is essential.

(in reply to crazyml)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? - 6/5/2011 1:52:27 PM   
coookie


Posts: 541
Joined: 10/25/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OwnedFemaleFlesh


You're entitled to your opinion on the theory of psychiatry, I'm entitled to mine. The people I know in my family and my friends with 'mental illnesses' have NEVER shown any improvement despite being prescribed all kinds of junk, in fact in many cases it make them worse. They do not 'fucking well work' You got that??!! I am entitled to question the science and accuracy of a medicine which fails to diagnose and cure people. I am also entitled to question a profession which labels and stigmatises people, and has the legal right to deprive them of their liberty on the basis of those labels. We are ALL entitled to question that. Psychiatry says that my sexuality is a paraphila, I say *that* is total fucking bullshit.

owned xxx


Have you not heard of clinical neuropsychology?

MRI's are fairly commonplace tools for psychologists and psychiatrists to access to check brain structure. PET scans not as much due to the cost of them. I am sorry that you had a bad experience with a psychiatrist. I once had a bad experience with my family doctor. I didn't stop going to all family doctors as a result. Just that one. There are MANY clinical psychologists and psychiatrists who are "kink-friendly" and there are even some who engage in BDSM just like you. If BDSM causes you (or the person you are performing the act upon) unwanted psychological distress, then yes it should be addressed clinically. Generally speaking they dont care you liked to be tied up and called a worthless whore as your head is pushed into a toilet.




E.T.A. I thought this was also the one Owned mentioned lack of brain imaging so pretend it is in there as well okay?


< Message edited by coookie -- 6/5/2011 1:55:13 PM >

(in reply to OwnedFemaleFlesh)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? - 6/6/2011 12:03:31 AM   
hematitan


Posts: 49
Joined: 6/25/2010
Status: offline
quote:


You're entitled to your opinion on the theory of psychiatry, I'm entitled to mine. The people I know in my family and my friends with 'mental illnesses' have NEVER shown any improvement despite being prescribed all kinds of junk, in fact in many cases it make them worse. They do not 'fucking well work' You got that??!! I am entitled to question the science and accuracy of a medicine which fails to diagnose and cure people. I am also entitled to question a profession which labels and stigmatises people, and has the legal right to deprive them of their liberty on the basis of those labels. We are ALL entitled to question that. Psychiatry says that my sexuality is a paraphila, I say *that* is total fucking bullshit.

owned xxx


I think it's good to question psychiatry. All medicine is imprecise to some extent, and the mind can be especially difficult to understand. Psychiatry isn't perfect. But even though some people don't have success with psychiatric treatment, others find that it saves their lives and makes it possible for them to function. The good experiences are just as real and valid as the bad ones. I think questioning psychiatry requires that we look at the whole picture. Ignoring a large part of it is biased.

(in reply to OwnedFemaleFlesh)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? - 6/6/2011 4:52:20 AM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
  Fast Reply.

Psychiatry is black magic with no scientific foundation.  Accordingly, it deserves the same respect as Voodoo.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to crazyml)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? - 6/6/2011 5:48:42 AM   
CreepyStalker


Posts: 265
Joined: 2/12/2011
Status: offline
This thread is suffering from a serious lack of definitions...

Psychiatry:
The branch of medicine concerned with the diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders

Psychology:

The science of mind and behaviour

Psychoanalysis:
A systematic structure of theories concerning the relation of concious and unconscious psychological processes, devised by Sigmund Freud.


Which one are we actually meant to be talking about, OP person? They're really not interchangeable at all, so we're getting a lot of crossed wires here at the moment.

< Message edited by CreepyStalker -- 6/6/2011 5:49:03 AM >


_____________________________

Extendible lesbian.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Sex and Psychiatry ? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109