willbeurdaddy
Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SilverMark If we apply the same way of thinking, then the radio evangelist who predicted the end of the world and the horrific calamities to follow his date might be correct? Climate change is pretty well a scientific fact that can be attested to by the extremes in temperature change in parts of the world where the ozone layer has been damaged by all of our polluting and some changes in the earth's positioning in relation to the sun and it's intensity. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/basicinfo.html I am of the opinion that when there is a preponderance of "NATURAL" disasters, they are just that, natural occurrences. The number and amount of damage in the recent tornado activity is much like the intensity and number of hurricanes in 2005, "NATURAL". Favorable climates for a higher number of storms such as El Nino and El Nina happen, prevailing wind changes and such are scientifically explainable but, forecasting the effects and where a much harder job. Its incredibly telling that when their predictions fail the GW crowd cries "Its short term weather not climate, andh we have never said weather is predictable", But when there is something that even smells like "An Incovenient Truth" all of a sudden weather is verification.
_____________________________
Hear the lark and harken to the barking of the dogfox, gone to ground.
|