xssve -> RE: Minimum Wage Increase Would Help Sluggish Economy, Say Experts (6/10/2011 7:13:32 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote:
ORIGINAL: DarkSteven The theory is that raising the minimum wage would shift money from stockholder value (which the article calls corporate profits) to the wage earning classes. I have no issue with that. But that's a view that is focused on larger companies. The smaller companies would simply hire less (as conservatives usually say) or simply go under. They missed a step (based on reading your post only DS). Price increases. Shareholder value and companies going out of business would only happen if the demand curve is so steep that they cant recover all or most of the cost increase. So to a large extent the result would be inflation that hurts the minimum wage earners more than anyone. Not quite - it's why I mentioned the Kennedy tax cuts - inflation is much worse for lenders than borrowers: if a given unit of capital declines in value, then debt shrinks, as do projected profits on that debt - that's why inflation is a dirty word to the Federal Reserve, not because it hurts minimum wage earners - it erodes capital reserves and the value of outstanding debt. We're already in an inflationary period, it's just being masked by the war debt, same thing happened back in the Sixties, everybody blamed it on Carter, but we were already in the stagflationary spiral, inflation just became suddenly apparent once Nixon ended the Vietnam war. Consumers made out like bandits, because prices cannot be renegotiated after the sale, banks and lenders took a huge hit: supply side theory and Monetarism were introduced, with the single and only goal of keeping inflation under control, regardless of how much pain it caused in the consumer/debtor sector - it's been used to keep wages stagnant for 30 years. That's the lesson of the Kennedy tax cuts. But, conditions have changed: we no longer have a supply side/productivity problem, we have the exact opposite: commodification that offsets a tapering off demand curve - that isn't any better for producers, and the result has been, predictably - more corporate welfare on one side, social decline on the other. This outsourcing, cheap labor thing can't last forever, we're better off in the long run finding a reasonable equilibrium point now - not a popular option when the prevailing ethic is get it while the gettin's good. Adam Smith predicts all this BTW, financialization and regressive taxation = economic decline, it's practically axiomatic.
|
|
|
|