RE: Clarance Thomas MUST RESIGN TO PRESERVE HONOR OF USSC!!!

RE: Clarance Thomas MUST RESIGN TO PRESERVE HONOR OF USSC!!! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

farglebargle -> RE: Clarance Thomas MUST RESIGN TO PRESERVE HONOR OF USSC!!! (6/8/2011 3:25:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4u Thomas is an asshole,plain and simple...unfortunately we all stood by enraptures with the scintillating details as his accuser was besmirched and generally flayed on national tv during the confirmation hearings..now we are stuck with the sight of a morally bankrupt and totally mediocre legal mind sits on the nations highest court. It's worse than that. How do we know he won't take a half-million from the Chinese for a favorable ruling? This has become a National Security Issue. Al Qaeda has lots of money. CAN WE AFFORD A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE WHO COULD JUST AS WELL ALSO BE ON AL QAEDA'S PAYROLL???

mnottertail -> RE: Clarance Thomas MUST RESIGN TO PRESERVE HONOR OF USSC!!! (6/8/2011 3:27:47 PM)
How do we know he hasn't already taken the money? What was his vote on corporate cash to politicians? Arnold Rothstein

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Clarance Thomas MUST RESIGN TO PRESERVE HONOR OF USSC!!! (6/8/2011 3:31:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania The only way to get rid of him is impeachment, so the pressure should be to start impeachment proceedings, and with the makeup of congress, I am thinking it would be extremely difficult, but you need a plan if you really believe in your cause, perhaps a website, other people who think like you, etc. LMAO. So not checking a box that isnt even required by law is now a high crime or misdemeanor. Good luck with that.

luckydawg -> RE: Clarance Thomas MUST RESIGN TO PRESERVE HONOR OF USSC!!! (6/8/2011 4:48:13 PM)
They don't have anything real. So hyper false outrage over nothing. Get used to it, it will get a lot worse as the election nears.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Clarance Thomas MUST RESIGN TO PRESERVE HONOR OF USSC!!! (6/8/2011 4:51:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg They don't have anything real. So hyper false outrage over nothing. Get used to it, it will get a lot worse as the election nears. We'll see how concerned they are about SCOTUS integrity if Kagan doesnt recuse herself on Obamacare.

farglebargle -> RE: Clarance Thomas MUST RESIGN TO PRESERVE HONOR OF USSC!!! (6/8/2011 5:41:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania The only way to get rid of him is impeachment, so the pressure should be to start impeachment proceedings, and with the makeup of congress, I am thinking it would be extremely difficult, but you need a plan if you really believe in your cause, perhaps a website, other people who think like you, etc. LMAO. So not checking a box that isnt even required by law is now a high crime or misdemeanor. Good luck with that. If Clarence Thomas will lie about "Has your spouse received any non-interest income?", then what WON'T he lie about?

juliaoceania -> RE: Clarance Thomas MUST RESIGN TO PRESERVE HONOR OF USSC!!! (6/8/2011 6:04:02 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: farglebargle quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania The only way to get rid of him is impeachment, so the pressure should be to start impeachment proceedings, and with the makeup of congress, I am thinking it would be extremely difficult, but you need a plan if you really believe in your cause, perhaps a website, other people who think like you, etc. LMAO. So not checking a box that isnt even required by law is now a high crime or misdemeanor. Good luck with that. If Clarence Thomas will lie about "Has your spouse received any non-interest income?", then what WON'T he lie about? Look at who you are aiming this at... His wife is an over the top partisan hack

FatDomDaddy -> RE: Clarance Thomas MUST RESIGN TO PRESERVE HONOR OF USSC!!! (6/8/2011 8:50:52 PM)
Look how angry you are

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Clarance Thomas MUST RESIGN TO PRESERVE HONOR OF USSC!!! (6/8/2011 8:54:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: farglebargle quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania The only way to get rid of him is impeachment, so the pressure should be to start impeachment proceedings, and with the makeup of congress, I am thinking it would be extremely difficult, but you need a plan if you really believe in your cause, perhaps a website, other people who think like you, etc. LMAO. So not checking a box that isnt even required by law is now a high crime or misdemeanor. Good luck with that. If Clarence Thomas will lie about "Has your spouse received any non-interest income?", then what WON'T he lie about? check all that apply [] I dont know what "misunderstand" means [] Im the worlds best mindreader and I know he lied, because I sure as hell dont have any fucking evidence he did [] Im so full of shit that my teeth are brown

farglebargle -> RE: Clarance Thomas MUST RESIGN TO PRESERVE HONOR OF USSC!!! (6/9/2011 3:14:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy Look how angry you are HELL YEAH I'M ANGRY! I'm angry that the highest judicial office in the land is for sale. I'm angry that Clarence Thomas can be bought for only $500 grand. It casts doubt onto the integrity of the entire court, since if one justice is so affordable, why not buy enough to ensure your legislative agenda is fulfilled? If domestic influence is so cheap, is there an additional premium paid for foreign nationals and governments to buy US Supreme Court Justices?

Aneirin -> RE: Clarance Thomas MUST RESIGN TO PRESERVE HONOR OF USSC!!! (6/9/2011 3:48:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: farglebargle Clarance Thomas' failure to disclose his family income of $650,000 from people with business before the US Supreme Court has dishonored the highest court, and he MUST RESIGN TO PRESERVE THE HONOR AND DIGNITY OF THE JUDICIARY. Justice Thomas knew that the box marked NONE next to the phrase "Spouse's Non-Investment Income" should only be checked if his spouse had no non-investment income. What do they mean resign to preserve the judiciaries honour, well, that has already gone and that by finding this person out, so prior to him being found out, the judiciary were already without honour. Will this person's resignation change the thought regarding the US Supreme court, well I don't know about anyone else, but sleaze found in one place might be indicative of more sleaze and that highly likely because where there's power, there is money and where there is brass, there is muck. But for someone to be forced to resign there position, will that really change anything, for now this being revealed there is suspicion and where there is suspicion a former position is eroded and that because the people who were seen to be honourable weren't.

farglebargle -> RE: Clarance Thomas MUST RESIGN TO PRESERVE HONOR OF USSC!!! (6/9/2011 4:20:42 AM)
So, you're saying that Clarence Thomas has destroyed the integrity of the US Supreme Court forever?

Aneirin -> RE: Clarance Thomas MUST RESIGN TO PRESERVE HONOR OF USSC!!! (6/9/2011 5:29:17 AM)
What do you think ? Corruption has been found, so corruption exists, would you trust the judiciaries after hearing about this as you did before ? Or will a simple resignation restore all that was lost ? And what about others in that same situation, are they squeaky clean, or is it because nothing yet has come to light regarding others, they are completely trustworthy and with honour ? Perhaps trust and honour will have to be proved for trust and honour to be believed after this situation, as it is clear the non disclosure of external interests proves people who should be trustworthy and honourable via their status aren't. Which brings me to the question, can trust and honour be bought, and if so, by whom and how will that effect fair judgement ?

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875