There oughta be a law... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message


Kirata -> There oughta be a law... (6/15/2011 10:52:46 PM)


There oughta be a law against delusory nicknames....

Anybody who has ever spent five minutes in Politics and Religion has already thought of at least two.

And then there are the ones like...

LittleSweetie (350 pounds) and MasterDomlyLord (who can't control his loud-mouthed subbie).

Argggh

K.






fadedshadow -> RE: There oughta be a law... (6/15/2011 11:21:44 PM)

that blasted deception!




dcnovice -> RE: There oughta be a law... (6/16/2011 8:17:06 PM)

quote:

Anybody who has ever spent five minutes in Politics and Religion has already thought of at least two.


I wonder if you're thinking of the same two I immediately thought of.




juliaoceania -> RE: There oughta be a law... (6/16/2011 8:23:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

Anybody who has ever spent five minutes in Politics and Religion has already thought of at least two.


I wonder if you're thinking of the same two I immediately thought of.


I know at least one that comes to mind instantly[:D]




0ldhen -> RE: There oughta be a law... (6/16/2011 8:54:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


There oughta be a law against delusory nicknames....


K.






You mean I'm not an armed chicken on a motorcycle with secret super powers and an attitude.........




Lucylastic -> RE: There oughta be a law... (6/17/2011 5:16:06 AM)

My elastic isnt tight
edited to add the nt...heh




slvemike4u -> RE: There oughta be a law... (6/17/2011 6:50:58 AM)

This thread is in sane...




LaTigresse -> RE: There oughta be a law... (6/17/2011 12:19:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

This thread is in sane...


Mua ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!

I bet the paycheck I have in my bag, the first name that came to my mind was the first name that came to everyone elses!!!!!!!!!!!!!![:D]




LadyHibiscus -> RE: There oughta be a law... (6/17/2011 12:22:05 PM)

I am so glad to say that I have no idea who you are talking about!




LaTigresse -> RE: There oughta be a law... (6/17/2011 12:23:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

I am so glad to say that I have no idea who you are talking about!


That is because you are probably smart enough to stay out of Politics and Religioun.




juliaoceania -> RE: There oughta be a law... (6/17/2011 7:54:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

This thread is in sane...


Mua ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!

I bet the paycheck I have in my bag, the first name that came to my mind was the first name that came to everyone elses!!!!!!!!!!!!!![:D]




Oh that is just "crazy" talk I tell ya[:D]




DesFIP -> RE: There oughta be a law... (6/17/2011 8:33:25 PM)

delusional is the word you were seeking.

As far as a sub being loud mouthed to you, what has that to do with the price of eggs? He may enjoy sparring with a quick witted sub, the fact that you don't says nothing about whether or not she's submissive. Simply that she isn't and never will be, submissive to you.

Nor does weight have anything to do with a d/lg relationship or desires to be in one. And please, don't start a fat thread or we'll be thinking of rude names for you.




Awareness -> RE: There oughta be a law... (6/17/2011 9:28:23 PM)

  Ever noticed how anyone who has "hot" or "sexy" in their username is anything but?




LaTigresse -> RE: There oughta be a law... (6/18/2011 7:25:14 AM)

Oh wow...........some days it is just wayyyyyyyyyyyyy too easy.




Lucylastic -> RE: There oughta be a law... (6/18/2011 8:09:49 AM)

LMAO LaT... not going there either




stef -> RE: There oughta be a law... (6/18/2011 9:09:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

Oh wow...........some days it is just wayyyyyyyyyyyyy too easy.

It's pretty funny when they lead themselves to slaughter.  I suppose you should just tack on "lack of" to the beginning of their usernames. 

~stef




juliaoceania -> RE: There oughta be a law... (6/18/2011 10:10:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

Oh wow...........some days it is just wayyyyyyyyyyyyy too easy.



I wasn't going to touch it[:D]




sexyred1 -> RE: There oughta be a law... (6/18/2011 10:14:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

  Ever noticed how anyone who has "hot" or "sexy" in their username is anything but?


Really? Just add blind to your other disabilities.




Kirata -> RE: There oughta be a law... (6/18/2011 2:00:56 PM)


I've numbered your statements to make it easier to respond:

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP

1. delusional is the word you were seeking.

2. As far as a sub being loud mouthed to you, what has that to do with the price of eggs? He may enjoy sparring with a quick witted sub, the fact that you don't says nothing about whether or not she's submissive. Simply that she isn't and never will be, submissive to you.

3. Nor does weight have anything to do with a d/lg relationship or desires to be in one. And please, don't start a fat thread or we'll be thinking of rude names for you.


1. Delusory is precisely the word I wanted, thank you very much. Look it the fuck up.

2. Your delusional construction of the post notwithstanding, the incongruence being noted was between self-proclaimed standing and fact.

3. Your delusional construction of the post notwithstanding, the incongruence being noted was between "little" and BIG.

See the difference in how those words are used? [:D]

K.





LillyBoPeep -> RE: There oughta be a law... (6/18/2011 2:21:54 PM)

i think she's talking about the fact that a woman who weighs 350 lbs can be perfectly functional in a D/lg relationship (hence using "little" in her s/n) because those relationships aren't necessarily about approximating a REAL Daddy/little girl relationship with regards to physical size relationships. there are some guys who form D/lg relationships with girls who ARE physically small and appear to be prepubescent, but not all "little girls" are physically little.
of course, not every person who has a name with the word "little" in it (or who IDs as an lg, for that matter) is looking to be involved in a D/lg relationship, so... i dunno. 

as far as the first statement in the OP goes, i wonder if the person i'm thinking of is the person everyone else is thinking of?




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125