Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: moderation interpretation?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: moderation interpretation? Page: <<   < prev  21 22 [23] 24 25   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:27:40 PM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I would have spelled it nonsense, it would have been ever so much more thoughtful coming from me, then. 

Everything you do and say is thoughtful, Ron.

Even if the only thing it's full of thoughts about is blowjobs.

_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 441
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:28:48 PM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: popularDemand

possession is nine tenths of the law

Innit. Which is why, unless needles is gonna get a flashlight and a balaclava and break into wherever CM's servers are, no thread will ever be hers.

_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to popularDemand)
Profile   Post #: 442
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:30:04 PM   
popularDemand


Posts: 228
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious

quote:

ORIGINAL: popularDemand

possession is nine tenths of the law

Innit. Which is why, unless needles is gonna get a flashlight and a balaclava and break into wherever CM's servers are, no thread will ever be hers.

been there, done that.

pD

_____________________________


A sentence should be like a serpent: Quick with a sting in its tail. String me a line that has meaning and depth.
There's no small talk with walky-talkies.
Small talk stinks.

(in reply to VaguelyCurious)
Profile   Post #: 443
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:30:20 PM   
needlesandpins


Posts: 3901
Status: offline 		it's context, blimey people, it really is very simple. i don't care what anything of the site says because in my everyday language i will still refer to something that i start as mine, because I started it. it cm wish to claim ownership then cool. that doesn't stop me refering to it as mine rather than just the title of the thread.

picky is as picky does.

needles

(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 444
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:30:33 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline 		Its mine I tell ya, its all mine...

get ur asses off my thread!

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to popularDemand)
Profile   Post #: 445
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:31:25 PM   
RedMagic1


Posts: 6470
Joined: 5/10/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather

Well, speaking as one cuntlicker to another, the Moderators already make judgments about what is and what isn't a "personal attack", I just think they should be less lenient when the potential attack is using the target's sexual practices.


Heather, you might reconsider your position against the occasionally proposed "Lgbt lifestyles" board. While there are general rules sitewide, emphasis in enforcement varies from board to board. Like politics, the Gorean board is modded differently from the rest of the site, as is Ask a Mistress, though in a different way. If you started a thread there, asking, "what is your favorite recipe for teacakes?" my guess is that it would stay there and not get moved. Normally such a thread would end up in OT, but the mods lean toward allowing femdoms to having their own discussion corner, and only the wank threads are moved out (or not...).

_____________________________

Not with envy, not with a twisted heart, shall you feel superior, or go about boasting. Rather in goodness by action make true your song and your word. Thus you shall be highly regarded, and able to live in peace with all others.
- 15th century Aztec

(in reply to HeatherMcLeather)
Profile   Post #: 446
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:31:53 PM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins

it's context, blimey people, it really is very simple. i don't care what anything of the site says because in my everyday language i will still refer to something that i start as mine, because I started it. it cm wish to claim ownership then cool. that doesn't stop me refering to it as mine rather than just the title of the thread.

...so if I start referring to you as my needles that means you're actually mine, and if anyone points out that this is bullshit they're just being picky? That's cool, my needles.

_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to needlesandpins)
Profile   Post #: 447
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:35:26 PM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins

it's context, blimey people, it really is very simple. i don't care what anything of the site says because in my everyday language i will still refer to something that i start as mine, because I started it. it cm wish to claim ownership then cool. that doesn't stop me refering to it as mine rather than just the title of the thread.


It's got fuck-all to do with "context". You can refer to black as white. Doesn't make you correct.

If you're going to try and converse with others in English, it helps not to try to rename everything to words you like, or which suit you.

You calling it "yours" doesn't make it yours. So, you can either a) pretend it is, use language suggesting it is, and generally make a fool of yourself or b) give the thing its proper name - it's *A* thread, not *YOUR* thread.

You want to rename it a banana, you go ahead. Just don't be surprised when people start pointing and laughing.

(in reply to needlesandpins)
Profile   Post #: 448
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:36:09 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins

it's context, blimey people, it really is very simple. i don't care what anything of the site says because in my everyday language i will still refer to something that i start as mine, because I started it. it cm wish to claim ownership then cool. that doesn't stop me refering to it as mine rather than just the title of the thread.

picky is as picky does.

needles


Beyond all of the legalities, the known common ideas of "public forum"... thinking of a thread as "mine" because I started it would be extraordinarily limited way of viewing a conversation. I can say I had a conversation with someone, I never have thought of it as "owning" the conversation. I share conversation, I do not own it.

You have a person who initiates a conversation, and then you have others who contribute to it, and all of these have technical academic terms when looking at language (I loved my linguistic training), but I do not think I have ever heard of a conversation in terms of ownership

A thread is a conversation between people, basically. collarme owns the venue where the conversation takes place. Think of it as a video taping of a physical location... just because you trained a collarme camera on a conversation you were having with someone doesn't give you ownership of the security tape at a venue...

Hope that was helpful


_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to needlesandpins)
Profile   Post #: 449
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:37:28 PM   
ModTwentyOne


Posts: 2504
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins

however, i can claim ownership of a thread if i start it, it's mine. if someone else starts a thread then they are the op and the thread is their's. context is everything.



I'll refer you back to my first post in this thread, where I said, "The person who starts a thread does not own the thread, and doesn't get to make up rules as to how people post or what is on topic or not. They also don't get to police the thread, telling others to stay on topic, as that is in itself, off topic. "

You can love it and keep it and call it George if you want; doesn't make it truly yours.

Mod21


_____________________________

If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

(in reply to needlesandpins)
Profile   Post #: 450
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:37:32 PM   
RedMagic1


Posts: 6470
Joined: 5/10/2007
Status: offline 		I think disenskulling people gets you wet.

_____________________________

Not with envy, not with a twisted heart, shall you feel superior, or go about boasting. Rather in goodness by action make true your song and your word. Thus you shall be highly regarded, and able to live in peace with all others.
- 15th century Aztec

(in reply to VaguelyCurious)
Profile   Post #: 451
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:37:47 PM   
needlesandpins


Posts: 3901
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious


quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins

it's context, blimey people, it really is very simple. i don't care what anything of the site says because in my everyday language i will still refer to something that i start as mine, because I started it. it cm wish to claim ownership then cool. that doesn't stop me refering to it as mine rather than just the title of the thread.

...so if I start referring to you as my needles that means you're actually mine, and if anyone points out that this is bullshit they're just being picky? That's cool, my needles.



it's not like i'm claiming copyright or anything. but should you care to go back through the pages of this thread you will find that someone said 'i was glad to see Heather's thread come back' that implies ownership in exactly the same context as i have been using it.

you can try and claim me all you like but i'm bloody expencive to keep.

needles

(in reply to VaguelyCurious)
Profile   Post #: 452
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:39:38 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline 		Back to my last question, can you own a conversation, or is it something you share with others?

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to needlesandpins)
Profile   Post #: 453
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:39:48 PM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins

it's not like i'm claiming copyright or anything. but should you care to go back through the pages of this thread you will find that someone said 'i was glad to see Heather's thread come back' that implies ownership in exactly the same context as i have been using it.


And they were wrong, as was she.

As are you.

(in reply to needlesandpins)
Profile   Post #: 454
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:40:13 PM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RedMagic1

I think disenskulling people gets you wet.

Nah. Accuracy, not disenskulling. Nice word, though. :p

_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to RedMagic1)
Profile   Post #: 455
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:40:41 PM   
needlesandpins


Posts: 3901
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ModTwentyOne


quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins

however, i can claim ownership of a thread if i start it, it's mine. if someone else starts a thread then they are the op and the thread is their's. context is everything.



I'll refer you back to my first post in this thread, where I said, "The person who starts a thread does not own the thread, and doesn't get to make up rules as to how people post or what is on topic or not. They also don't get to police the thread, telling others to stay on topic, as that is in itself, off topic. "

You can love it and keep it and call it George if you want; doesn't make it truly yours.

Mod21



i am not claiming ownership as in this bit of of the site as in pack it up and take it away. it's just me refering to something i started as oposed to someone else starting it. therefore my thread and not someone elses.

needles

(in reply to ModTwentyOne)
Profile   Post #: 456
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:41:36 PM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins

i am not claiming ownership as in this bit of of the site as in pack it up and take it away. it's just me refering to something i started as oposed to someone else starting it. therefore my thread and not someone elses.


"I say it is ... all the other captains say it isn't".

(in reply to needlesandpins)
Profile   Post #: 457
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:42:15 PM   
RedMagic1


Posts: 6470
Joined: 5/10/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious


quote:

ORIGINAL: RedMagic1

I think disenskulling people gets you wet.

Nah. Accuracy, not disenskulling. Nice word, though. :p

I totally relate. Accuracy people get me hard as a rock.

_____________________________

Not with envy, not with a twisted heart, shall you feel superior, or go about boasting. Rather in goodness by action make true your song and your word. Thus you shall be highly regarded, and able to live in peace with all others.
- 15th century Aztec

(in reply to VaguelyCurious)
Profile   Post #: 458
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:42:27 PM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins


it's not like i'm claiming copyright or anything. but should you care to go back through the pages of this thread you will find that someone said 'i was glad to see Heather's thread come back' that implies ownership in exactly the same context as i have been using it.

You weren't claiming copyright, no. But you were saying to the beardy one whose name I can't remember that since a thread is yours you're more entitled to get shirty with the mods (and with him) about it being moderated. Which is bullshit.

And like RF said - someone else saying something doesn't actually make it right. And putting the word context in really big letters doesn't do anything much either.

_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to needlesandpins)
Profile   Post #: 459
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 4:43:28 PM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RedMagic1

I totally relate. Accuracy people get me hard as a rock.



_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to RedMagic1)
Profile   Post #: 460
Page:   <<   < prev  21 22 [23] 24 25   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: moderation interpretation? Page: <<   < prev  21 22 [23] 24 25   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125