Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: moderation interpretation?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: moderation interpretation? Page: <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 8:22:56 PM   
HannahLynHeather


Posts: 2950
Joined: 4/4/2011
From: where it's at
Status: offline
quote:

the OP sets the slope down which we all roll
on what fucking planet? man a thread goes wherever the fuck it wants. trust me on this one buckwheat.

_____________________________

clique? i don't need no stinking clique!

fuck a duck ~w. disney

My Twitter: http://twitter.com/HannahFuck

i hope you enjoyed the post, and as always my friends....have a nice day

(in reply to popularDemand)
Profile   Post #: 501
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 8:35:55 PM   
VideoAdminRho


Posts: 2055
Joined: 3/24/2010
Status: offline 		Thank you for your opinion, RedMagic1.

< Message edited by VideoAdminRho -- 6/20/2011 8:37:21 PM >

(in reply to RedMagic1)
Profile   Post #: 502
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 8:43:05 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RedMagic1

Hee hee!

That is exactly the sort of thing I would like to keep out of general, though, Rho. Or, more precisely, perhaps, limit it to at most one train wreck thread there at a time. It causes some people not to post, and the energy infects some of the others who do post, so things degenerate.


I see very few trainwrecks going on in general discussion. When I first joined this site there would be several a week. Everything from "Why are subs fat" to "Slaves are more submissive than subs" threads... safeword threads that went for weeks (yes, I used to argue about these things too). Those things are not debated much anymore. The people who stirred the pot about those topic are no longer posting here... they self selected, as you would say. That is what you said you wanted, those who like train wrecks and arguing to go elsewhere... yet at the same time you seem to be bemoaning the loss of posters (or retention of them). Lets face it, there is a popcorn smiley for train wrecks for a reason, they can be entertaining to some people, and they generate traffic.

I do not go to PR for train wrecking. I genuinely love to debate political crap. I have been doing it for 12 years over the internet intently, and I enjoy it... I do not go there to beat up people so I can get it out of my system so when I post in lifestyle forums I can behave myself.


_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to RedMagic1)
Profile   Post #: 503
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 8:55:08 PM   
HannahLynHeather


Posts: 2950
Joined: 4/4/2011
From: where it's at
Status: offline
quote:

Rum?
captain sparrow! i know why the rum is gone! rho and the other mods drank it all!

_____________________________

clique? i don't need no stinking clique!

fuck a duck ~w. disney

My Twitter: http://twitter.com/HannahFuck

i hope you enjoyed the post, and as always my friends....have a nice day

(in reply to Wolf2Bear)
Profile   Post #: 504
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 11:13:40 PM   
popularDemand


Posts: 228
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CalifChick

quote:

ORIGINAL: popularDemand

it would appear you've lost that "context" thing during multiple quotasms.

pD


So are you and the thread owner friends?  Partners?  Switchy kinksters who like to "bump uglies" (to use a vulgar American term)?  Sure seems like you have her back quite firmly.

Cali



does it matter to you?
pD

_____________________________


A sentence should be like a serpent: Quick with a sting in its tail. String me a line that has meaning and depth.
There's no small talk with walky-talkies.
Small talk stinks.

(in reply to CalifChick)
Profile   Post #: 505
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 11:14:52 PM   
popularDemand


Posts: 228
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather

quote:

the OP sets the slope down which we all roll
on what fucking planet? man a thread goes wherever the fuck it wants. trust me on this one buckwheat.

I don't understand your language
pD

_____________________________


A sentence should be like a serpent: Quick with a sting in its tail. String me a line that has meaning and depth.
There's no small talk with walky-talkies.
Small talk stinks.

(in reply to HannahLynHeather)
Profile   Post #: 506
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 11:39:20 PM   
HannahLynHeather


Posts: 2950
Joined: 4/4/2011
From: where it's at
Status: offline 		i am not even the slightest bit surprised by that


_____________________________

clique? i don't need no stinking clique!

fuck a duck ~w. disney

My Twitter: http://twitter.com/HannahFuck

i hope you enjoyed the post, and as always my friends....have a nice day

(in reply to popularDemand)
Profile   Post #: 507
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 12:04:43 AM   
VideoAdminRho


Posts: 2055
Joined: 3/24/2010
Status: offline
quote:

captain sparrow! i know why the rum is gone! rho and the other mods drank it all!
Shhhhhh! Oh, and while you are up, can you get me a coke and some ice?

(in reply to HannahLynHeather)
Profile   Post #: 508
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 2:10:04 AM   
sunshinemiss


Posts: 17673
Joined: 11/26/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious

quote:

ORIGINAL: popularDemand

possession is nine tenths of the law

Innit. Which is why, unless needles is gonna get a flashlight and a balaclava and break into wherever CM's servers are, no thread will ever be hers.


Am I the only who wondered what baklava had to do with this thread?

_____________________________

Yes, I am a wonton hussy... and still sweet as 3.14

(in reply to VaguelyCurious)
Profile   Post #: 509
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 2:12:41 AM   
DeviantlyD


Posts: 4375
Joined: 5/26/2007
From: Hawai`i
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather

quote:

the OP sets the slope down which we all roll
on what fucking planet? man a thread goes wherever the fuck it wants. trust me on this one buckwheat.


I used to work with a young woman by the name of Kasha...which translates to buckwheat. I would tease her about it on occasion, but not too much because she also cut my hair. ;)

(in reply to HannahLynHeather)
Profile   Post #: 510
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 2:13:21 AM   
sunshinemiss


Posts: 17673
Joined: 11/26/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NuevaVida

quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious

CM's just one big bunch of conga lines.


Where's sunny? This should seriously be a quote of the day. 




I thought the same thing. But here's the deal. I have to actually go to work, people!!!

_____________________________

Yes, I am a wonton hussy... and still sweet as 3.14

(in reply to NuevaVida)
Profile   Post #: 511
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 3:03:00 AM   
ranja


Posts: 2111
Joined: 11/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: VideoAdminRho

FR~
And some members wonder why the Mods drink


I have never wondered about that... but it explains a lot... blurred vision, impared judgement?????

(in reply to VideoAdminRho)
Profile   Post #: 512
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 3:13:39 AM   
ranja


Posts: 2111
Joined: 11/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

Those who freak at the mods every time they delete or move something, need to better understand the concept of shoveling shit into the surf.

there is a lot less shit to shuffle if you just let it flow to the cesspit naturally... but if you start meddling i think you should put up a sign

quote:

   Implied ongoing ownership is just bullshit and anyone who is in such a rush that they think they don't have to read the TOS on a website they SIGN A CONTRACT with, is essentially an idiot when they post 'what should be'. Never mind that giving up ownership and acquiescing to the actual owner of the data, the  right to modify are fundamental customs on the internet in regard to content such as we post here. Then again assholes and opinions are inexorably linked.


photos posted here are surely still your own property, and peoples own opinions also remain their own... you don't loose rights to your own stuff just because you share it else where, the site might imply that that is the way it is , but that is just not right.
That the site might change things or forbid things or delete things is fine, but they should be upfront about it in my opinion (which remains my opinion)

quote:

   I've often thought that this stems from some view on the part of the author that they have created some 'intellectual property' that if left to rest in it's 'hallowed' spot, picked out 'specially' by it's author, that someday, along will come another who will read their marvelous creation and spark a revolution or generate the next occurrence of the big bang. Sadly, this is more likely a sign that they should simply decrease the dosage.


That might be the case for some, but who cares?

(in reply to SternSkipper)
Profile   Post #: 513
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 3:21:26 AM   
ranja


Posts: 2111
Joined: 11/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
Speaking of which, I'm not particularly fond of false accusations on the boards. I tend to see them the same as blacklisting that's outlined. If you can't back up the claim, don't put it on the board about another poster. However, I'm probably harsher on that because I'm very much against people intentionally (or due to ignorance) lying about others.


ha that is rich

< Message edited by ranja -- 6/21/2011 3:22:30 AM >

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 514
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 3:40:31 AM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss

Am I the only who wondered what baklava had to do with this thread?

....and just like that, I'm hungry.

Is balaclava not a word that gets used in American English, or did you just misread? (That's a serious question, because it occurs to me that it's a word from the Crimean war, so it might well not have made it over the pond. Language is interesting.)

And thank you to you and Nueva for talking about QOTD - I'm glad I could make you guys smile.

_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to sunshinemiss)
Profile   Post #: 515
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 3:50:41 AM   
sunshinemiss


Posts: 17673
Joined: 11/26/2007
Status: offline
Sunny
Quote of the Day
goes to
VaguelyCurious

for
CM's just one big bunch of conga lines.



http://www.collarchat.com/m_3727992/mpage_25/tm.htm

_____________________________

Yes, I am a wonton hussy... and still sweet as 3.14

(in reply to VideoAdminRho)
Profile   Post #: 516
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 3:55:43 AM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline 		Yay! You've officially drawn the world's coolest conga line.

_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to sunshinemiss)
Profile   Post #: 517
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 3:58:24 AM   
sunshinemiss


Posts: 17673
Joined: 11/26/2007
Status: offline 		... as long as I get to be the pineapple. I love that pineapple....

_____________________________

Yes, I am a wonton hussy... and still sweet as 3.14

(in reply to VaguelyCurious)
Profile   Post #: 518
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 3:59:52 AM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline 		I like the little dude on the crutches.

'What, these old things? You think they're gonna stop me doing the conga? No sirree!'

_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to sunshinemiss)
Profile   Post #: 519
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 6:44:53 AM   
VideoAdminAlpha


Posts: 3876
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: popularDemand



I dont believe the thread was initially about 'noobs' getting answers to questions. But about moderation techniques etc in general

you will have been accepted and welcomed, you're female/couple I assume?

Females (I doubt) would be viewed as looking for WankFodder outright. Males, it would appear, are.

This thread is a good example of derailing being okay... we're no longer talking about the initial subject, and the discussion has been varied.
(I have to admit to being lost to a large degree, as comments and posting from 'other' threads have also been raised in here.)

as for banning:
I was... on this site.
No explanation, no reply to question... but hey, thats the nature of the beast, we are told.

pD


I have not read past this remark so have no idea whether a mod has answered you or not, but......was this banning in prior periods, because you are posting now so you are not banned?


_____________________________


You can't please all the people all of the time.Unfortunately there are times you cannot please any of them :( You can only do your best, and hope they realize that.

(in reply to popularDemand)
Profile   Post #: 520
Page:   <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: moderation interpretation? Page: <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094