RE: moderation interpretation? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Icarys -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 7:58:01 AM)

quote:

while i think the bickering has gone on long enough, i do actually have to agree with him here. i've seen much snarkier/flat out hateful things posted by other people and nobody seems to notice.

Careful agreeing with the likes of me. You might be added to a shit list. :>




VideoAdminAlpha -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 7:58:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

dammit, VAA!! PARAGRAPHS, woman!!!  LOL

*waits for my gold letter*

THAT being said:

I agree with Chatte's take: 

quote:

There is "mine" as in something I own. This house is mine. That means I live there, I own it (or pay rent on it) and therefore have some responsibility for it.

Then there is "mine" as in, the thing I started. It could be a thread, it could be a child, it could be a  relationship. Your actual ownership and responsibility varies on what precisely is owned.

I could easily see my saying, "My thread on XYZ" not meaning mine as in I control it, but mine as in I started it. Starting something does in many cases give you some responsibility. How many begin a thread and then abandon it, even though posters have questions that need answered in order to have the full picture? That is just so annoying.

When I start a thread, I do feel some responsibility in terms of paying attention to it in case I need to make clarifications. Other than that, I don't care much if it's moderated, hijacked, it turns into a pissing contest, whatever. It goes where it goes and the mods will do whatever they deem appropriate. That's what I signed on for and it works for me.




I am 200 posts behind reading and you are all posting faster than I can catch up. Sorry if I rushed all my thoughts to be able to pull fan flames as needed........[;)]




sunshinemiss -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 7:59:47 AM)

I got some flames you can fan...VAA. VAA VAA VOOM!




sexyred1 -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 8:09:13 AM)

I am sure everyone can see right through you, just like I do.

If you notice, I only come down on 3 people on the boards, you and two others who continually rant and rave over women speaking their minds. I don't attack anyone personally, you just have a hard on for what I say.

You are so incredibly dense, I actually now feel sorry for you. The various trolls we get here have more self control than you do.

It is a shame no one loves you, but don't take it out on the women here. I am not the only one you personally attack; you are like a mad dog barking at the moon.

Like Sunshine said, give it a rest. You are only succeeding in making yourself look worse than you already do.




Icarys -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 8:10:21 AM)

quote:

Only males can engage in pissing contests? Who knew? I swear, I have to learn to read my email.

That's kinda my point with her particularity. She misses things when it comes to her.

Before you reply to that..I know what I'm doing.[:D]




GreedyTop -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 8:11:08 AM)

you need an assistant :)

*hugs*

I wish there was a way to email a post simultaneously (sp? too not bothered to look it up) to posting to an individual.  Excpet to the Mods who are already overworked.

Wait.. ok, nevermind... the reason for me wishing that was negated.....




Icarys -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 8:12:32 AM)

[:(] Please stop! I just can't take the pain anymore...my sides are splitting.




ranja -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 8:15:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha
sure why you feel the need to know this answer unless it is because you have a concern as to whether a moderator might possibly post as a regular user on a thread then moderate the same thread,


Thanks for recognising me, eventhough i am still on [awaiting approval]
and yes i think my points are valid too,
i am also not the only one who thinks you might want to consider using paragraphs it seems.

i do not need to know the answer to my question, i don't even know if any answer would even be true... i mean... how can i check it? I just have to take your word for it, and this is cyber... who knows what is true and what is not?
But indeed it is a fact that if moderators post as regular users too, then obviously they are not impartial at all... so their judgement will be bias in certain occasions.

That and the drinking....well....

But obviously bum licking is the think to do... so:
I think all the moderators do a marvellous job, you are only human and i'd give you all a big hug and foot massage if i could....
now can you please please please please please please please pretty please with cherries on top let me off [awaiting approval] ??? PULEAZZZZ


(PS that would save you quite some time reading all my terrificly interesting contributions too)





Icarys -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 8:35:41 AM)

quote:

Yes, I suppose women can engage is pissing matches, but I like to think we engage is debates and discussions.

You got this wrong based on your thinking so it's no wonder you've got the next part wrong.

quote:

I do not feel I attack anyone on a personal level unless they have attacked me


Ignore is probably best when facing truths that you'd rather push under a rug. Will she be like the rest now that have me on ignore? Taking shots when they know they don't have to face the music anymore.[:D]

I don't hold out much hope for that part of her character.




NuevaVida -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 8:40:38 AM)

Is it just me who finds it ironic that the "Moderation" thread seems to be one of the most heavily moderated (by necessity) threads we've come across in awhile?

Maybe I need more coffee...




sunshinemiss -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 8:41:37 AM)

Even when there is no humor, there is irony.




LadyHibiscus -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 8:42:56 AM)

I have only read a page or two of this thread... I am leaping in to say that the HIDE function is my friend, and I have no fear of using it. I don't have all that many people on hide, but it is so wonderful to be able to ignore them utterly. Unless someone quotes them. [&:]




RapierFugue -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 8:47:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

Yes, I suppose women can engage is pissing matches, but I like to think we engage is debates and discussions.


You may like to think that, but it isn't true. The male and female genders both contain argumentative individuals.

<fx: chorus of women shouting "Fuck off! We're not argumentative!"> ;)

Possession of a penis is neither a prerequisite for, or a talisman against*, getting involved in a verbal punch-up.

*I now have a mental image of a bloke at the head of a debate club, waving a willy around in his hand (possibly his, possibly not) and screaming "I'M NOT GETTING INVOLVED!"




RapierFugue -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 8:48:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NuevaVida

Is it just me who finds it ironic that the "Moderation" thread seems to be one of the most heavily moderated (by necessity) threads we've come across in awhile?


It's a kind of self-fulfilling prophecy :)




LaTigresse -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 8:51:31 AM)

I used it once......a long time ago.

I have that old saying of 'Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer.' ingrained into my brain. But truth be told, there are so few that I even think are worth hiding, if indeed I was of the inclination.

I am quite good at ignoring. I see specific avatars and skip right over them. Not necessarily because they are nasty but there are some that I just felt were too laborious to read based upon writing styles and/or lack of content. Much of the stuff in Polls and Random Stupidity, Humour, and the Politics and Religioun is like that for ME. I just don't bother with reading blah boring stuff.

I chose to read stuff that stimulates my mind. Occasionally a poster that is in my boring category, crazy as a fucking loon category, or my asshole category, or whatever.......will post something that breaks through my ignore feature. I take a quick glance and either go back to ignoring or not.




GreedyTop -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 8:52:18 AM)

~FR~

I can be argumentative, and snarky, and just damned unpleasnat to be around..LOL

I dont think women are any more or less inclined to engage in pissing matches, in general.




RapierFugue -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 8:52:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

I chose to read stuff that stimulates my mind. Occasionally a poster that is in my boring category, crazy as a fucking loon category, or my asshole category, or whatever.......will post something that breaks through my ignore feature. I take a quick glance and either go back to ignoring or not.


The only ones I hide are the perpetually boring.

That's still plenty enough, mind :)




LaTigresse -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 8:55:24 AM)

There are many times when I see a post and have a flash back to the Charlie Brown animated short movies.

"Wha wha wha wha, wha, wha wha wha....."

Cuz that is just about how it registers in my brain.




RapierFugue -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 9:00:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

There are many times when I see a post and have a flash back to the Charlie Brown animated short movies.

"Wha wha wha wha, wha, wha wha wha....."

Cuz that is just about how it registers in my brain.


Excellent description!

And yes, they're the ones who end up in my bozo bin ... endless repetition; either of bile, stupidity or downright dullness.

At least the purely stroppy ones are entertaining, in a train crash sort of way.




juliaoceania -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/21/2011 9:18:00 AM)

quote:

It is my personal choice not to post, because I know there are those that know who I am, and I never want there to be the appearance of impropriety since I am the supervisor of  the whole site. That is not a site directive, that is my personal choice. Some of the moderators may or may not have user accounts that post on the boards, some do not.


I respect this very much.... not that it matters how I feel...lol




Page: <<   < prev  26 27 [28] 29 30   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.152344E-02