quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Grooming is subjective?  Thats your fuckin cant now?

Sad and pathetic, really.  

So, your slanted devoid of fact opinions are now incontrovertable evidence?   

quote:


luckydawg
I only accuse of lying, after I present evidence that the claim is false (or its so common there is no need), and the person continues to claim it is true.
Actually you are lying, O said Ws behavior was reprehensible.
Obama says his conduct was "reprehensible".
However Obama and I find it reprehensible

There is a lie right there, you present no evidence and call someone a liar, later when you have no room to dissemble, and you think no ones watching.....

quote:


luckydawg
That he sent out thousands of un solicited-underwear erection pics?
People made fake accounts (at least one posing as 16 year old) and he took the bait, and other women had to tell him to stop following 16year olds.
He did PM Flirt with a child, picked her out of his followers list.
And there was more than one UM.
One can pretend he wasn't grooming her for later.

No evidence there, but now it is 'subjective', a ploy to let you off the hook again, but you are seen for what you are.  

quote:


luckydawg
One of the complaining women said he was calling from a gov phone.
Make sure the public knows the Left supports Congresspeople flirting on the Computer with their UM's.

 
Ah, the 100% verified facts now......

quote:


luckydawg
Nothing I stated is supposition, it is all 100% verified fact.
Everything (except for a few simple mistakes which I readily admit to) I post is true and I can back it up.

Well, we have come down off your 100% verified fact to now maybe you got one right in there somewhere if you do your typical invertabrate wiggling....

So, back it up with credible citations......or is that another less than 100% verifiable fact you need to slither away from?


Hey, ucky, this is your ignorant asswipe, not mine.

Just a bunch of silly jibberish.

Its all the little lying bitch has.