RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


HannahLynHeather -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 9:18:05 PM)

quote:

an unsupported assertion based solely on your beliefs
what unsupported assertion did i fucking make?




DecadentDesire -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 9:22:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather
ok, please explain to me how the definition of a delusion does not apply to religious belief.


Tommorrow, when I wake up, I will be waking up to a host of unknowns. What if I suffered a car accident and was driven into poverty from medical bills? What if my company wasn't able to replenish it's pipeline with new contracts and I am layed off? What if I never meet the love of my life and die alone with a ton of cats?

And when I do wake up, I will deal with these potentials unknowns with optimism. The belief that things will, in fact, work out and if they do not, then I will be able to properly deal and overcome the obstacle.

Of course, there is no logical reason for me to think like this. No logical reason for me to assume that things will work out. Given that I am just a mere human, the scenario of an obstacle that I cannot overcome is all too realistic. Therefore, there is no logical reason to assume I can overcome any obstacle in pursuit of happiness.

So, in light of this, would you consider my optimism to be a delusion?

What about love? I'm not talking about the chemical reaction that drives us to procreate, but the great mystery of the deep emotional bond between two people that we call "love". The emotional bond that can grow so strong that people will kill themselves at the loss of a significant other, because of a belief that they cannot live without them.

There is nothing to logically support such a belief. In all reality, they are physically capable of going on without this person. They managed to do so before they met that person and no reason why they can't after they are gone. After all, this "bond" between then isn't like a roll of duct tape, physically restraining them from living. It's just something in their heads.

In light of that, would you consider people who experience love to this depth to be delusional?

The human experience is chalk full of things that cannot be simply categorized into "real" and "not real", "true" and "false". A lot of these things we won't normally consider to be delusions, because they are a common experience. We accept them as normal and part of life and it's not until they are scrutinized that the lines between reality and delusion are called into question.

Belief in God is kind of like one of those things.

You asked what the difference is between belief in God and belief in a 6 foot tall bunny rabbit. Well, the difference is that the belief in a 6 foot tall bunny rabbit is an anomaly. It's a experience shared by only a tiny, microscopic percentage of the human population. However, man's faith in God and his personal quest for higher truth is an experience shared by the vast majority of the human race. Entire wars have been fought over it, incredible organizations have formed over it, and the number of books written about it could fill libraries.

The overwhelming majority of the human race experience God in some shape or form just like the overwhelming majority experience love or approach life with optimism. To chalk that experience up as some psychological delusion, an anomaly on par with a few people believing in a 6 foot tall giant rabbit, is simply insulting to the intelligence.

And that's all I have to say on this subject. I'm not getting dragged down into this rabbit hole.





Hippiekinkster -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 9:24:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather

quote:

an unsupported assertion based solely on your beliefs
what unsupported assertion did i fucking make?
Yanno, I used to be a rabble-rouser when I wuz a Yute. Even had my own little LSD cult. But then I got old, and segued into that "Age and Guile" thing.

Your, ahhhh, "fiestyness" is refreshing.

I like what John Lennon said (paraphrasing): "You (xstains) disbelieve 21 of the 22 major holy books. I just disbelieve one more."




Marini -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 9:25:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DecadentDesire

quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather
ok, please explain to me how the definition of a delusion does not apply to religious belief.


Tommorrow, when I wake up, I will be waking up to a host of unknowns. What if I suffered a car accident and was driven into poverty from medical bills? What if my company wasn't able to replenish it's pipeline with new contracts and I am layed off? What if I never meet the love of my life and die alone with a ton of cats?

And when I do wake up, I will deal with these potentials unknowns with optimism. The belief that things will, in fact, work out and if they do not, then I will be able to properly deal and overcome the obstacle.

Of course, there is no logical reason for me to think like this. No logical reason for me to assume that things will work out. Given that I am just a mere human, the scenario of an obstacle that I cannot overcome is all too realistic. Therefore, there is no logical reason to assume I can overcome any obstacle in pursuit of happiness.

So, in light of this, would you consider my optimism to be a delusion?

What about love? I'm not talking about the chemical reaction that drives us to procreate, but the great mystery of the deep emotional bond between two people that we call "love". The emotional bond that can grow so strong that people will kill themselves at the loss of a significant other, because of a belief that they cannot live without them.

There is nothing to logically support such a belief. In all reality, they are physically capable of going on without this person. They managed to do so before they met that person and no reason why they can't after they are gone. After all, this "bond" between then isn't like a roll of duct tape, physically restraining them from living. It's just something in their heads.

In light of that, would you consider people who experience love to this depth to be delusional?

The human experience is chalk full of things that cannot be simply categorized into "real" and "not real", "true" and "false". A lot of these things we won't normally consider to be delusions, because they are a common experience. We accept them as normal and part of life and it's not until they are scrutinized that the lines between reality and delusion are called into question.

Belief in God is kind of like one of those things.

You asked what the difference is between belief in God and belief in a 6 foot tall bunny rabbit. Well, the difference is that the belief in a 6 foot tall bunny rabbit is an anomaly. It's a experience shared by only a tiny, microscopic percentage of the human population. However, man's faith in God and his personal quest for higher truth is an experience shared by the vast majority of the human race. Entire wars have been fought over it, incredible organizations have formed over it, and the number of books written about it could fill libraries.

The overwhelming majority of the human race experience God in some shape or form just like the overwhelming majority experience love or approach life with optimism. To chalk that experience up as some psychological delusion, an anomaly on par with a few people believing in a 6 foot tall giant rabbit, is simply insulting to the intelligence.

And that's all I have to say on this subject. I'm not getting dragged down into this rabbit hole.




Thankyou for the thoughtful post, and not being "scared" to speak your mind, DecadentDesire!!
I think many people are ashamed to admit they are a Christian on here, they are in the closet.
But let something happen to them, they are on their knee's, asking for prayers, accepting prayers, and everything else.
I will never be ashamed to state I am a Christian.
[sm=applause.gif]




Musicmystery -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 9:28:29 PM)

“Russell said that there is no difference between those men who eat too little and see Heaven and those who drink too much and see snakes.” Marvelous leered sardonically into his wine.

“The difference,” said Amanda serenely, “is that one of them sees Heaven and the other sees snakes.”

--Tom Robbins
Another Roadside Attraction




Marini -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 9:35:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather

quote:

you would have more time to consider ethical teachings
i'm all for ethical teachings, its just the need to hang them on the belief in a non-existent deity where i have a problem. and i wouldn't really have an issue with that either, if the fuckers who believe wouldn't insist that the world take notice of their delusions and make allowances for them.


What should these fuckers do to not be noticed?
What about the world having to notice gays and lesbians?
Who died and left you in charge, of who should be noticed and who should not be noticed?




DecadentDesire -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 9:46:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini
Thankyou for the thoughtful post, and not being "scared" to speak your mind, DecadentDesire!!
I think many people are ashamed to admit they are a Christian on here, they are in the closet.
But let something happen to them, they are on their knee's, asking for prayers, accepting prayers, and everything else.
I will never be ashamed to state I am a Christian.
[sm=applause.gif]


Just for the record, I'm not a Christian, nor am I an Atheist. I'm also taking no stance on the existence or non-existence of God.

The only stance I am taking is that simplifying the very complex human experience called faith into a "delusion" is...well....dumb.




HannahLynHeather -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 9:49:03 PM)

thanks for actually fucking answering the question.

quote:

So, in light of this, would you consider my optimism to be a delusion?

your optimism isn't delusional because its based on many years experience and the law of fucking probability. yes there's a chance that something insurmountable will come up, it isn't fucking likely that it will. in fact, people who live their lives in fear of the highly unlikely bad possibilities are considered to have mental problems, just because they are so fucking unlikely.

quote:

In light of that, would you consider people who experience love to this depth to be delusional?
yes. here's why: "because of a belief that they cannot live without them" as you pointed out, that belief is wrong. they are perfectly fucking capable of continuing to live. if heather dies i may well decide to fucking off myself. but it won't be because i believe i can't live without her, but because i don't fucking want to.

quote:

To chalk that experience up as some psychological delusion, an anomaly on par with a few people believing in a 6 foot tall giant rabbit, is simply insulting to the intelligence.
you see, i find this whole "everybody thinks this way" argument to be fucking insulting to my intelligence. the fact that this particular idea, that there is a deity of some description, is and has been a nearly universal experience does not prove any validity other than that a belief in a god is the simplest method of filling a need in the average human psyche. it assuages a deep seated fear of being effectively alone in fucking uncaring universe, it allows one to attach unwarranted importance to one's own basically irrelevant existence, it allows one to accept the fucking horrid things that happen in life, and it allows one to avoid difficult questions.

its useful as fuck, but that doesn't make it true. all the fucking evidence points in the opposite direction.




Marini -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 9:53:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DecadentDesire

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini
Thankyou for the thoughtful post, and not being "scared" to speak your mind, DecadentDesire!!
I think many people are ashamed to admit they are a Christian on here, they are in the closet.
But let something happen to them, they are on their knee's, asking for prayers, accepting prayers, and everything else.
I will never be ashamed to state I am a Christian.
[sm=applause.gif]


Just for the record, I'm not a Christian, nor am I an Atheist. I'm also taking no stance on the existence or non-existence of God.

The only stance I am taking is that simplifying the very complex human experience called faith into a "delusion" is...well....dumb.



Thank you for the well thought out post.
We all have the right to our belief systems.

I embrace your right to take no stance at all.
Peace and Blessings to you.




Kirata -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 9:54:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather

ok, please explain to me how the definition of a delusion does not apply to religious belief.

Princeton's Wordnet defines delusion as, "an erroneous belief that is held in the face of evidence to the contrary." This is substantially in agreement with the definition that you presented, namely, "a false belief strongly held in spite of invalidating evidence." Note, though, in reference to the latter, that what makes it a "false belief" is the invalidating evidence. To claim that a belief is false in the absence of evidence to invalidate it may itself be stating a false belief.

Now, since we must face the fact that there is no hard evidence with which either to prove or disprove the existence of God, that rules out classifying belief in God as a delusion right there. But nevertheless, I'll give you this much: People who claim to "know" that God exists are delusional. And I can say that precisely because we are unable to prove whether or not God exists. Because it isn't their belief in God that's delusional, it's their belief that they know.

K.




Musicmystery -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 9:56:25 PM)

quote:

To claim that a belief is false in the absence of evidence to invalidate it may itself be stating a false belief.


And that's the rub.




HannahLynHeather -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 9:56:58 PM)

quote:

What should these fuckers do to not be noticed?
its the demand that their delusions be treated as anything other than delusions that's the fucking problem.

quote:

What about the world having to notice gays and lesbians?
i don't know, maybe because gays and lesbians are fucking real, they actually fucking exist outside of somebody's imagination?

quote:

Who died and left you in charge, of who should be noticed and who should not be noticed?
well according to your mythology, that fucking jesus guy did.




Marini -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 10:07:32 PM)

You type as if you are angry.
The majority of Christians are very quiet and peaceful, and if we are
delusional, guess what?
We have a right to believe in whatever we want to believe in, as you have the right to believe we are delusional.

I appreciate your participation in this thread.
Peace and Blessings to you!




Jeffff -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 10:12:24 PM)

FR~

I have always thought it takes as much faith to be sure there is no god, as to be sure there is.




HannahLynHeather -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 10:13:49 PM)

quote:

Now, since we must face the fact that there is no hard evidence with which either to prove or disprove the existence of God, that rules out classifying belief in God as a delusion right there.
but there is ample evidence against the existence of god.
1. there is simply no evidence whatsofucking ever that supports the existence of a god.
2. every attempt ever made to prove the existence of god has fucking failed.
3. it is impossible to fucking reconcile the way life actually is with god as described by the various religions.

now i'm no fucking scientist, but seems to me if i propose a fucking hypothesis and there is zero evidence to support it, all experiments designed to prove it fail, and it contradicts the observable reality, well i'd be pretty fucking sure you'd say it is disproved.

as well, why is there no fucking common ground when it comes to just what god is like. even within christainity there are, according to the op, over 38,000 different fucking ideas of what the fuck god is like and what he fucking wants and said. if a god actually existed, one would think that the message he/she/they give would be consistent wouldn't you? they can't all be fucking right.




HannahLynHeather -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 10:18:28 PM)

quote:

You type as if you are angry.
i'm not, i just fucking swear a lot <if rather unoriginally>. you read me looking for anger that isn't there. its a common thing when i disagree with somebody. when we agree i'm fucking forthright, when we disagree, i'm angry, or screaming, or some other fucking silliness.

and thanks, i'll take all the peace and blessings i can fucking get.




Marini -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 10:18:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather

quote:

Now, since we must face the fact that there is no hard evidence with which either to prove or disprove the existence of God, that rules out classifying belief in God as a delusion right there.
but there is ample evidence against the existence of god.
1. there is simply no evidence whatsofucking ever that supports the existence of a god.
2. every attempt ever made to prove the existence of god has fucking failed.
3. it is impossible to fucking reconcile the way life actually is with god as described by the various religions.

now i'm no fucking scientist, but seems to me if i propose a fucking hypothesis and there is zero evidence to support it, all experiments designed to prove it fail, and it contradicts the observable reality, well i'd be pretty fucking sure you'd say it is disproved.

as well, why is there no fucking common ground when it comes to just what god is like. even within christainity there are, according to the op, over 38,000 different fucking ideas of what the fuck god is like and what he fucking wants and said. if a god actually existed, one would think that the message he/she/they give would be consistent wouldn't you? they can't all be fucking right.

8

Well we are going to put you in charge of studying all 38,000 and then report back which one or one's are the RIGHT ones!
[sm=goodnight.gif]




HannahLynHeather -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 10:21:06 PM)

quote:

Well we are going to put you in charge of studying all 38,000 and then report back which one or one's are the RIGHT ones!
i already answered that. none.




Kirata -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 10:31:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather

they can't all be fucking right.

They can all be fucking wrong, though. [:D]

And why would someone as independent as you give a shit what they say anyway? Wouldn't you want find the answer for yourself? Particularly if it seemed that every fucking answer you ever got from anyone else was bullshit?

K.




Kirata -> RE: Thousands of classes/types of Christians/Christians are not one size fits all! (6/28/2011 10:33:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather

i already answered that. none.

[image]http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk173/chuatesolo/cat.jpg[/image]

K.




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625