LafayetteLady
Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007 From: Northern New Jersey Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: RapierFugue If the system is properly regulated, such as in the Swiss model, then that's not a problem. IIRC, under the Swiss model, a total of 3 clinicians, each SMEs, must all agree to the person's wishes, and even then you have to be assessed as sound of mind and uninfluenced by others. If there's even a hint someone is applying pressure then the request is denied, and I believe any subsequent application is vetted even more thoroughly. In the US, with some of the culture of legal power and money-first, people-last attitudes then yes, I agree, it might be an issue, although not impossible to administer, one would hope. The Swiss seem to be more advanced in that regards than the US. I was going to say that there needs to be strict regulation in place here in the US so that greedy beneficiaries or angry relatives could not play a part. Personally, while I agree with the concept, I would want very strict regulations even to the point of a list of illnesses that one must suffer in order to "qualify." I know that isn't a great word, but can't think of something else. I lost my parents to "natural" causes, and I don't know how I would have handled any of them wanting such a thing. In the US it is a good concept that needs certain restrictions in place (such as the Swiss model) to make sure it is not used improperly. That is my biggest concern with it...being used improperly.
|