EligibleOwner
Posts: 51
Joined: 10/16/2009 From: London Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather OP, I would sincerely hope that nobody would discard their partner like so much rubbish. I understand that there are people for whom love doesn't play a part in their dynamic (I don't understand how), but even then I would think that a master would still have a responsibility to his slave. Perhaps he should seek a younger more able slave for the bedroom, and have the older slave run the household, after all those years I'm sure she would be quite good at it. She could probably also train the new slave in the ways the master likes to be served in the bedroom. Just imagine how enjoyable it would be to have the older slave teach her how he likes his cock sucked, what with all the demonstrating and trying and practicing, it could go on for hours.[/color] I agree with this completely - and I think it makes sense even without love. I think the owner has responsibility for the slave, at least after a period of good service, and as long as she's doing what she can. I think what happens in practice depends how you've lived your lives till then. If the owner has made proper provision for the slave to live a decent independent life, then maybe releasing her into that is a reasonable exercise of responsibility. But if she owns nothing, has no savings of her own and so on, then I think only an irresponsible man would "dump" her. If she's committed to being a slave long-term, and has kept her end of the bargain, then I think she's earned a place in the household. I also think it's a really beautiful idea that a slave who one day needs personal care might one day be cared for inside the household, by her master and any new slaves, rather than in some "home".
|