RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM

RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Real0ne -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/9/2011 10:02:17 PM)
yeh its about jurisdiction those articles always use improper or at best quasi-proper terms. no different really than the shit we hear on mainstream news every day.

Real0ne -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/9/2011 10:03:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or [image]http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/blacks/mortgagedfornationaldebtcongress-1.jpg[/image] They're not going to understand that ! It's in plain English. T^T another good call, second round of beers goes to term!

Termyn8or -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/9/2011 10:09:04 PM)
Oh, and on that last line, after the part highlighted by someone who should be shot at sunrise, (if you highlight you assume more knowledge than the author) consider those words : We only need gold to settle our balances with foreign countries. DON'T THINK ABOUT IT ! IT IS NOT REAL. It is only words. What it really means is that things are fine. A chicken in every pot. A car in every driveway. Equality for the doctor as well as the crackhead, equality for everyone, except for ............... We will surely be equal. Everyone will be broke. T^T

Termyn8or -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/9/2011 10:18:28 PM)
"You clip a page out of a record from 1933 as if this proves something," You REALLY need to learn some history. This is behind so much of the shit that killed our economy it's not funny. The people who did it did it to gain political favor with the voters who were ignorant of the consequences. It is not going to be one day we must learn Chinese, nothing of the sort, but our wealth has been taken to fuel a war machine that seems to have no off switch. And either this generation or the next will bear the consequences of those acts. This is real, this is not bullshit. It's not a matter of them marching down the streets, clearing us out of our houses for Chinese immigrants to move in. No matter how bad it is there, they don't want to come here. But you might live to see gasoline at twenty bucks a gallon, things like that. And then comes time when it takes a wheelbarrell full of money to buy a postage stamp or a loaf of bread. Think it can't happen ? It already has. And it is coming here. This will give way to civil unrest and changes on an immense scale, which basically finishes the job of destroying this country's principles and ideology. T^T

Termyn8or -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/9/2011 10:20:40 PM)
"Now you`re just weird and getting more pathetic by the post." He should thank you for your support. You like it. That's why you suppot the continuation of this thread by posting. Keeps it on the top page. Thanks for helping. T^T

Termyn8or -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/9/2011 10:26:51 PM)
"...the us assigns the proceeds over to them and they collect essentially in the same ..." You mean we will pay taxes and that money will be sent to China ? Oh wait........it already is. I guess you're right then, nothing will change to the casual observer, it's just a legal status thing. Words. Well when you shoot people in the mouth their words stop. It's about 150 years too late huh. T^T

Termyn8or -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/9/2011 10:31:21 PM)
"what were they discussing? You do realize everything ever said in congress is in the congressional record, that doesn't mean much " OK RealO, that's your cue. It's right up your alley. The actual act, the legislation to that effect. Surely you have the resources to find it, or you already have it. And we know it's going to be in legalese, but if they want it, give it to them. T^T

Termyn8or -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/9/2011 10:42:07 PM)
"You do realize everything ever said in congress is in the congressional record, that doesn't mean much " Huh ? That's the minutes, if you know the rules of order. The record is actually what someone said, but when it becomes something in the record it isn't just every fillibuster out there. It becomes part of the official record, not the minutes, for a reason. If RealO doesn't get the actual act, I will, but I figure he has better resources. If not I'll find it myself and then you can compare that excerpt from the official record with what the act actually said. Sorry for you when you do, because illusions get shattered that way. T^T

outhere69 -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/10/2011 4:39:19 AM)
This is what concerns me about the original fishwrap: "This is an unimaginable betrayal of every man, woman and child in the USA. An outrage worthy of violent overthrow. " (parentheses added) So, they spread an urban legend and advocate a violent overthrow. Ann Coulter would have a field day with them there treasonous bastards!

zephyroftheNorth -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/10/2011 5:41:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: flcouple2009 1 if by plane 2 if by slow boat PA if by short bus Ha! That made me laugh. Thankfully I was not drinking coffee at the time [>:]

juliaoceania -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/10/2011 5:46:31 AM)
You do understand context? Who said it? Was it a part of legislation?

juliaoceania -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/10/2011 5:48:18 AM)
quote: Huh ? That's the minutes, if you know the rules of order. The record is actually what someone said, but when it becomes something in the record it isn't just every fillibuster out there. Without context it is meaningless...

DomKen -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/10/2011 5:57:17 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or They're not going to understand that ! It's in plain English. T^T I happen to have looked up that qute before Termy. Would you care to try and support what you claim it means? Keep in mind this fact, the US did not actually leave the gold standard in 1933, what the Congressmean in question was calling for. Also keep in mind that the legislation under debate includes no such language but would have created a fiat currency, i.e. a currency with no intrinsic value, so it could never represent a mortgage on citizens property.

pahunkboy -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/10/2011 6:23:47 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or "With less then 30 days to default- I am quite serious." Now that's bullshit. You have to understand something, they are not coming. They don't want our land. They don't want for factories here when the people still make too much and are uneducated by most of their standards. They simply don't want it. The problem is that they might sell it to someone who does. Ever hear of a collection agency ? How do they make money ? We will be discounted ! But the fact is, without some serious military might, nobody is going to do shit, which is why I advocate default now, while we still have something left. The main problem is those who now take what we have left and they're not done yet. Thirty days ? Try thirty years. It might happen but things will have changed and at that point nobody will care. You got kids ? I don't so I don't care anymore. If I live thirty years I'll be eighty. Fuck all that. T^T No they are not coming- too many guns here. Isnt it amazing tho how the top brass wants to get rid of guns.

Hippiekinkster -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/10/2011 9:28:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania You clip a page out of a record from 1933 as if this proves something, there is no context, no sort of history about the post you made... it is like much of the nonsense you post Theme from "HUNKY: CONSPIRACY FERRET"

Hippiekinkster -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/10/2011 9:35:37 AM)
HUNKY EATS A BROWNIE

jlf1961 -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/10/2011 1:07:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy No they are not coming- too many guns here. Isnt it amazing tho how the top brass wants to get rid of guns. The "top brass" is not trying to get rid of guns. Hunky, I suggest that first thing monday morning you make a call to the local mental health agency and get an intake appointment, you are in desperate need of some medication.

mnottertail -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/10/2011 3:02:30 PM)
If, just if we put these guys in chinese finger cuffs, we could cash their checks and get out of this, like anyone who gets wages as a bank teller is going to be able to tell their signature.........

Real0ne -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/10/2011 3:33:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or They're not going to understand that ! It's in plain English. T^T I happen to have looked up that qute before Termy. Would you care to try and support what you claim it means? Keep in mind this fact, the US did not actually leave the gold standard in 1933, what the Congressmean in question was calling for. Also keep in mind that the legislation under debate includes no such language but would have created a fiat currency, i.e. a currency with no intrinsic value, so it could never represent a mortgage on citizens property. so what are you looking for? a long title? If the topic is macrame and someone states 2+2=4 does that mean the math is bulshit because its not part of the topic? not only did it create a currency with no intrinsic value as you said but that currency is a promise to pay one dollar and it belongs to the federal reserve, hence you cannot ever be the paramount owner. That dollar is a debt note hence a mortgage against the holder in the first place. Do you know what a mortgage is in law? What are you driving at?

juliaoceania -> RE: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts. 060 February 26, 2009 FEDS GRANT EM (7/10/2011 4:02:02 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania You clip a page out of a record from 1933 as if this proves something, there is no context, no sort of history about the post you made... it is like much of the nonsense you post Theme from "HUNKY: CONSPIRACY FERRET" I love that song!

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875