Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural causes, than be fired for poor performance


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural causes, than be fired for poor performance Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 10:02:58 AM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline
Yeah, actually, I think that knowing that if you work hard you'll be able to keep your job, rather than having to worry that you'll be caught up in a quota of layoffs, does support a positive work ethic. I think people are a lot more likely to work hard at a place they've been working for 30 years than they would at a temp job.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 10:13:07 AM   
zephyroftheNorth


Posts: 8159
Joined: 10/5/2009
From: The Great Frozen North
Status: offline
quote:

Here's a thought. Why not just outsource those jobs to China and India? My father works at the Social Security department, managing people's benefits and claims. Some guy in India could totally do that. It would be way cheaper, and emulate the private sector's ability to turn record profits by sending money outside the US.


You're being sarcastic here, right? RIIIIIGHT??? ~starts to panic~


_____________________________

And there's a smile when the pain comes
The pain gonna make ev'rything alright ~ Black Crows

Team Troll Trollop
Member: Cocksuckers For World Peace
Charter member: Lance's Fag Hags
Member: Subbie Mafia
Member: Hibbie's Hotties

(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 10:18:40 AM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline
Yeah I'm being sarcastic...I mean if it's okay to lay off 20% of the workforce every year to cut costs, why not go the whole way? Maybe TheHeretic is as appalled at that as I am at his idea. Or maybe he's just trolling to try to annoy liberals. Who knows.

(in reply to zephyroftheNorth)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 10:20:37 AM   
zephyroftheNorth


Posts: 8159
Joined: 10/5/2009
From: The Great Frozen North
Status: offline
I knew that, I was just messing with ya...and about Rich? sometimes it's hard to tell. 

_____________________________

And there's a smile when the pain comes
The pain gonna make ev'rything alright ~ Black Crows

Team Troll Trollop
Member: Cocksuckers For World Peace
Charter member: Lance's Fag Hags
Member: Subbie Mafia
Member: Hibbie's Hotties

(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 10:31:18 AM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
If you'd read my post, instead of just having knee-jerk reactions to positions that only exist in your own mind, Impera, we might get somewhere.  Somehow, my suggestion that performance reviews every few years be used to move people along and motivate the rest (as they move along and find motivation in the economic sector that pays the bills) has become annual 20% cuts?

You've never addressed the stagnation that develops in these lifer jobs, never acknowledged the entitlement mentality, and would rather mischaracterize and demonize than think.  Have a lovely day


_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 10:33:44 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

You've never addressed the stagnation that develops in these lifer jobs, never acknowledged the entitlement mentality, and would rather mischaracterize and demonize than think.


To be fair, you've assumed longevity and low turnover equals stagnation and entitlement mentality, without establishing it.

Most businesses would LOVE that kind of low turnover, as continually rehiring is expensive.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 11:36:22 AM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
I see it as pretty well established, Muse.  The government is driven to stay efficient by the fear of armed insurrection, and not much else. (Hence, the improvements in a lot of DMV offices over the last decade or so.  ).  That's a much slower cycle than you'll get in a free market, where competition keeps things moving.  If we accept the premise that "normal is what you are used to," lifelong workers in a stagnant environment, are going to stagnate.  Throw the work schedules in, the employee protection rules, and all those nice holidays the working class works right through, and you get a workforce with a very different idea of "normal," than out in the sector of the economy that supports them.



_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 11:53:12 AM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

If you'd read my post, instead of just having knee-jerk reactions to positions that only exist in your own mind, Impera, we might get somewhere.  Somehow, my suggestion that performance reviews every few years be used to move people along and motivate the rest (as they move along and find motivation in the economic sector that pays the bills) has become annual 20% cuts?

You've never addressed the stagnation that develops in these lifer jobs, never acknowledged the entitlement mentality, and would rather mischaracterize and demonize than think.  Have a lovely day



You're right, you didn't say 20% every year, you said that should be the target every few years.

I did address entitlement mentality when I said that the "entitlement" here is that if you show up to work and do your job you are "entitled" to keep it. I really don't see what the problem is there. You do your job, you keep your job, you don't get laid off because someone wants to put a 15-20% "target" of layoffs, just to keep you on your toes so you don't feel entitled to keeping the job you show up to do every day.

In fact you're the one who never addressed that "entitlement mentality" - why do you not think that someone who does their job is entitled to keep it? Why do you believe it's better to fire a reliable worker simply because you "can't think of a single reason why driving a water truck for the city should ever be a career."

And besides that, you think that a government job that provides a decent salary and benefits for unskilled labor is creating an "entitlement mentality cancer," how about those same jobs in the private sector? You know, something like factory work or construction...if a guy works for a company for 30 years, shows up and does his job well, do you think he has some sort of "entitlement mentality cancer" if he doesn't think he should get fired so that they can bring in new people to pay less to cut costs? Assuming the guy did nothing wrong, like I'm assuming these government workers did nothing wrong...you think its a "cancer" to think that if you do your job reliably you should keep it?

The reason I didn't address the "stagnation that develops in these lifer jobs" is because there's nothing to address. You just said that it's stagnant. But here's the thing, sometimes stagnant means stable. Take a good look at the private sector - all the factory workers whose jobs were shipped overseas, all the administrative staff whose companies went under, all the layoffs due to lower profits...suddenly "stagnant" steady employment looks kind of good when the rest of it is crumbling down. And you think the government should emulate this?

My problem isn't with performance reviews. With regard to performance reviews, I said this:

quote:

If the only goal is to get rid of incompetent employees, you don't need a percentage quota. You can judge based on a performance review and fire those who don't measure up, whether that's 3% or 30%.


My problem is with your motivation. Your motivation is to literally pull the rug out from under the working class and make it that much harder for them to keep a steady job. Not because there's any proof that they are bad employees, but because you don't like the fact that they think that they should be able to keep their job. Do you not realize how sick that sounds?

< Message edited by imperatrixx -- 7/24/2011 11:55:45 AM >

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 11:57:22 AM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline
quote:

Throw the work schedules in, the employee protection rules, and all those nice holidays the working class works right through, and you get a workforce with a very different idea of "normal," than out in the sector of the economy that supports them.


Yeah, it's almost like government workers get the standard that the rest of the civilized world follows, while private sector workers get the shit the Chinese and Mexicans have to put up with.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 12:02:29 PM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline
Oh and another thing, I'd rather get in the line for the guy who's worked at the DMV for 30 years than the new guy who has to call someone over to show ask if the ID I brought was good enough.

(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 12:37:51 PM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
"The government is driven to stay efficient by the fear of armed insurrection, and not much else. "

...I used to work for the UK post office. Yanoo, dem evil gubmint workers.

I can tell you categorically, that we were not motivated to work hard by fear of armed insurrection. And we did work hard.

We worked hard because the vast majority of us were proud to work in service to the rest of society.

Now, perhaps that kind of thinking is less prevalent in the USA. You know, that service to your fellow citizen thing.

I know that Americans understand that kind of thinking when it applies to armed forces, you all understand how that is a service to your fellows.

Why can't you see it when you look at non-military service?

(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 1:33:40 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
why not outsource gov't jobs? Why is that only acceptable for the private sector?

If we are truly interested in cost cutting measures outsource damn near everything, I am serious. When our economy and standard of living finally hits the same level as those countries that are now accepting these jobs we will see the trend slow or possibly even reverse.

How cool would it be for our grandchildren to be answering phone calls from China or Argentina?

Of course as a nation, we are far too stupid to be able to even learn English let alone another language or two.

_____________________________



(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 2:07:38 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

"The government is driven to stay efficient by the fear of armed insurrection, and not much else. "

...I used to work for the UK post office. Yanoo, dem evil gubmint workers.

I can tell you categorically, that we were not motivated to work hard by fear of armed insurrection. And we did work hard.

We worked hard because the vast majority of us were proud to work in service to the rest of society.

Now, perhaps that kind of thinking is less prevalent in the USA. You know, that service to your fellow citizen thing.

I know that Americans understand that kind of thinking when it applies to armed forces, you all understand how that is a service to your fellows.

Why can't you see it when you look at non-military service?



And that is how it should be, Phil.  People go in, view it as public service, and then move on to whatever the next thing is, instead of slowly seeing it as just a career, and a pension plan.  The military is an excellent model.  Most are in and out after an enlistment term or two.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 2:12:43 PM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

And that is how it should be, Phil.  People go in, view it as public service, and then move on to whatever the next thing is, instead of slowly seeing it as just a career, and a pension plan.  The military is an excellent model.  Most are in and out after an enlistment term or two.



...and yet some make a career of it.

Should we prevent those people serving their fellow citizens in the name of civilisation?

First off, let me make one thing clear. If you're no good at your job, leave or be sacked. I seriously doubt anyone would disagree with that.

What I'm not happy with in this proposal is the quota.

I see absolutely no functional difference between this idea and, let's say, positive discrimination.

Both practises are social engineering.

Both practises dont treat people as individuals, rather as groups.

Both practises unfairly and wrongly tie the hands of hirers and firers.

Both practises cut across the principles of the free market.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 2:12:51 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx
Your motivation is to literally pull the rug out from under the working class and make it that much harder for them to keep a steady job.


Wow.  Where the fuck did you come up with that?  Never mind.  I don't care.   

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 2:18:46 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

I see it as pretty well established


That's what's called an opinion, Rich.

Established is when you provide convincing evidence.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 2:21:47 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

What I'm not happy with in this proposal is the quota.


Ok.  Say we frame the idea more along military service lines, and view government employment as say, four-year terms of service, with an 80-85% retention rate?

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 2:26:43 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx
Your motivation is to literally pull the rug out from under the working class and make it that much harder for them to keep a steady job.


Wow.  Where the fuck did you come up with that?  Never mind.  I don't care.   


He`s describing/explaining GOP theory the roll of government.

It should be so small and ineffective as to allow Wall Street/corporate-crooks free reign to swindle the middle/working class(read '08' bush-no-lube-assfuck-economic tanking).

And so small that even public service employees are thrown from the middle/working class.

The 1st part is in the works and working and the 2nd part is on your wish list.




_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 4:49:23 PM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

What I'm not happy with in this proposal is the quota.


Ok.  Say we frame the idea more along military service lines, and view government employment as say, four-year terms of service, with an 80-85% retention rate?



...you know, that makes more sense.

If civil service jobs were contract jobs, just as in the military as you suggest, that would make more sense. Also, if this approach was to be tried, there should be help and/or forgiveness with student loans.

However, morally, it could only apply to new hires, or there'd have to be compensation for those hired in good faith under the current regime.

It should be noted though, as someone mentioned earlier, that your suggestion would result in an even less efficient civil service.

Time in position counts. When I worked at the post office there were the old hands you could turn to for advice and suggestions when you got stuck. Those decades of experience were useful and only added to the efficiency of the whole organisation. When things go wrong, its the old hands who've seen it all before who solve it. Not the new hire who is cheap.

As an earlier poster said, when you go to the DMV with a non standard query, who's going to be able to help you? The rookie with just two years on the job, or the veteran with 20?

There seems to be an underlying assumption that civil service jobs are not skilled jobs, or that they require any training. While some are certainly unskilled jobs, some require masters degrees and above. Some require an actual talent.

The civil service is not a lesser sort of employment as compared to the private sector. Both types of employment are part and parcel of a civilised society.

So, let's give civil servants the respect they deserve, instead of seeing them as some sort of low grade evil that should be disposed of.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural cause... - 7/24/2011 9:11:12 PM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx
Your motivation is to literally pull the rug out from under the working class and make it that much harder for them to keep a steady job.


Wow.  Where the fuck did you come up with that?  Never mind.  I don't care.   


That's exactly the problem. You don't care. You're as bad as a damn communist, you have your abstract ideas about how things "should" be and what the "problem" is and you're happy to fire tens of thousands of people and completely shake up the economy because you can only see the textbook side, not the human side.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Federal workers more likely to die of natural causes, than be fired for poor performance Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109