Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The Natural submissive


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: The Natural submissive Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Natural submissive - 7/30/2011 12:18:50 PM   
coookie


Posts: 541
Joined: 10/25/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: erieangel

quote:

ORIGINAL: leadership527


Submissive personalities who submit (which I call generally submissive, socially submissive, or submissive by personality).


But it's a pretty safe bet that whatever anyone is doing is "natural" to them.

Honestly you'd do better to be worrying about what makes you a good dominant.


This^^

I'm always too quick to post to form such coherent thoughts. Leadership nailed it though. I'm a submissive personality, though I don't submit to everybody. I don't submit to my kids (though my son tries to be the boss of the house) and I certainly don't submit to my clients. Sometimes I don't even submit to my boss, if he's wrong about something, I let him know it. In other words, my level of submission is totally dependent on the person I am dealing with as well as the situation.

OP, your use of the "natural" seems synonymous to the word "true" as in the so-called "true submissive". Whenever I read states like yours, I'm thinking what the hell is a "natural or true submissive"? Whatever they are, I am certainly not one. I'm just me.

And Leadership is right about another thing, worry about yourself. If you want a woman to submit to you, you need to a dominate male worthy of that submission.


Both of you have said this much nicer than i could.

(in reply to erieangel)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: The Natural submissive - 7/30/2011 5:17:55 PM   
poise


Posts: 9509
Joined: 7/3/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: myotherself

*wedges a boot-clad foot under Poise's ass and gives a mighty heave-ho*

Glad I could help. I'm a natural submittive, donchakno?


ouchiesThankouchiesyououchiesSOouchiesmuch!ouchies

Does this mean I have the luckiest ass on CM, seeing as I had a rabbits foot there?

_____________________________

When the path ignites a soul, there’s no remaining in place.

(in reply to myotherself)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: The Natural submissive - 7/30/2011 5:40:08 PM   
DeviantlyD


Posts: 4375
Joined: 5/26/2007
From: Hawai`i
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: poise


quote:

ORIGINAL: myotherself

*wedges a boot-clad foot under Poise's ass and gives a mighty heave-ho*

Glad I could help. I'm a natural submittive, donchakno?



ouchiesThankouchiesyououchiesSOouchiesmuch!ouchies

Does this mean I have the luckiest ass on CM, seeing as I had a rabbits foot there?



*LOL* That was funny. Thanks for the laugh! I wish more posts were of this type. :)

_____________________________

ExiledTyrant's groupie. Catering to his ego since May 26, 2007. :D

(in reply to poise)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: The Natural submissive - 7/30/2011 6:21:42 PM   
leadership527


Posts: 5026
Joined: 6/2/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: erieangel
If you want a woman to submit to you, you need to a dominate male worthy of that submission.

And here's another angle on it that I don't fully understand. OK, so let's take a trip down fantasy lane for a moment. Let's just assume that I actually AM the dominant personality that I think I am. If that's true (which I personally believe whether or not anyone else does) then any non-dominant personality I hook up with will pretty automatically become whatever I think of as "the perfect partner" (within reasonable distance anyway). The last I checked the word "dominant" implies that I'm in control, right? So my own belief system tells me that I need not worry about the perfect partner. I only need to be as dominant, respect-worthy, and trust-worthy as I think I am.

That being said, there are VERY good reasons why dominants don't talk about dominance. Especially here it would be much like slathering yourself with seal blubber and going swimming in shark infested waters.


_____________________________

~Jeff

I didn't so much "enslave" Carol as I did "enlove" her. - Me
I want a joyous, loving, respectful relationship where the male is in charge and deserves to be. - DavanKael

(in reply to erieangel)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: The Natural submissive - 7/30/2011 7:28:20 PM   
OsideGirl


Posts: 14441
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: leadership527
Especially here it would be much like slathering yourself with seal blubber and going swimming in shark infested waters.
So, that would be bad?


_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to leadership527)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: The Natural submissive - 7/30/2011 8:12:08 PM   
JWriter


Posts: 67
Joined: 7/27/2011
Status: offline
quote:

The section guidelines clearly give one the option of sharing their thoughts and experiences as well as just start discussions. Questions are not mandatory so, you were right the first time.


Except that the section guidelines clearly indicate that the point is to "open the discussion" and public statements are not something to open a discussion.

"Join the Third Reich or Die."
"I Grok Spock!"
"Shit Happens!"

"Yankee go home."

"Black is Beautiful"
"All zebras are purple."
"God save the Queen!"

The above are all examples of public statements. They do not invite discussion, because, they are simply bold-faced statements, which leave you nowhere to go, but, in nodding agreement, or, away as quickly as possible.

I was wrong, to the extent, that he is free to open a discussion and does not have to have a question to ask; but, I was not wrong about public statements. There is nothing in the guidelines asking for or okaying the use of those.

Not that I really care, in many respects. Just that I was reading in hopes that there would be an interesting question, and, If there was, I missed it.

He does sound rather keen on s-types, though, from what I can tell. I just .. don't know what was left to discuss about it, and, nothing was learned, except about him, personally - by me.

(in reply to BitaTruble)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: The Natural submissive - 7/30/2011 8:36:49 PM   
HannahLynHeather


Posts: 2950
Joined: 4/4/2011
From: where it's at
Status: offline
that's funny, heather didn't seem to have any trouble reading his monologue and finding a few interesting things to discuss. well no not really, the reasons she could and you couldn't are pretty fucking obvious.


_____________________________

clique? i don't need no stinking clique!

fuck a duck ~w. disney

My Twitter: http://twitter.com/HannahFuck

i hope you enjoyed the post, and as always my friends....have a nice day

(in reply to JWriter)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: The Natural submissive - 7/31/2011 12:31:00 AM   
gungadin09


Posts: 3232
Joined: 3/19/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Masterdx2001

The Natural Submissive

#1
I feel that courtesy is a strong indication of a good submissive as well as a good dominant.

Courtesy towards whom? (yes, i said "whom". i'm pretentious like that.)

#2
As a submissive, he or she asks his or her dominant for an immense amount of time, attention, and thought. Dominating someone requires a great deal of work and effort. While the submissive obviously has needs, he or she should devote himself or herself to pleasing his or her dominant as best they can.

So far, so good.

#3
The submissive being honest and sincere about what types of play interests him or her.

Yes.

#4
If the submissive is a masochist, with little or no interest in performing personal service for a dominant, he or she may tend to annoy or frustrate a dominant that has high expectations on being served. Also, there are those subs that are only interested in performing or providing a sexual service. While others tend to provide such services on a limited basis, such as domestic or office help, and then there totally devoted submissive’s who serve their dominant any way they can.

Not sure what your point is. What you have said so far is not controversial.

#5
One of the qualities of good submissive is to show honesty with respect to his or her needs and desires, to the extent that he or she currently knows and understands them, will serve the sub well here.

Of course.

#6
While a dominant is not essentially under any obligation to request that the submissive do things that suit him or her. The sub should offer numerous ways to his or his dominant as reasonably possible. After all, the more way a submissive can make a dominant's life pleasant, the more useful he or she is as a sub. A good submissive should diplomatically be as clear as he or she can about his or her limits. I strongly believe that a frustrated and resentful submissive is no fun for any dominant.

i still think that it's about both people's needs being met. One person needs to have control. The other person needs to give it up. Each of them is filling the other's needs.

#7
Another characteristic that describes a good and true submissive is to not be pushy.

i agree.

#8
A good sub won't approach a dominant and, uninvited; descend to his or her knees at his or her feet. I can tell you from my lifestyle experience that it is a truly a turn-off with many dominants, myself included.

i can tell you from my experience, that that is not a turnoff for every Dom.
'
#9
This can be viewed, in its own fashion, as a non-consensual act, given the fact consent and negotiations are the one of the cornerstones of SM and DS. I appreciate and can tolerate a certain amount of subtle, low-key flirting. I am definitely impressed by formal introductions from potential submissive’s, whether by email, in person, or introduced through a known third party.

i agree.

#10
A good and true submissive won't approach another sub's dominant and come onto him or her by kneeling or acting submissive in a conspicuous manner without that dominant's prior and express approval. Doing so can create immense hostilities between the two submissive, which can spiral out of control.

Duh.

#11
A good and true submissive should avoid being a smart-ass masochist. SAMs will misbehave on purpose to provoke their dominants into punishing them.

i think that's annoying, too.

#12
This can be fun and erotically hot within the context of a pre-negotiated scene. I love for my sub to be what I call "sassy defiance." I absolutely love it when a submissive can make me rise to the challenge of making her hot ass heel. Being a SAM is frowned upon when it is engaged in a non-consensual fashion, or when the couple is outside the SM scene.

#13
A sub who acts in such a manner is essentially weak to ask for what they really desire in an honest manner.

i don't like bratty subs either.

#14
In my lifestyle experience, I have some smart-assed masochists provoke real anger in some dominants. This essentially denotes a deliberate emotional or physical hurting of the dominant to receive the desired response. Such behavior, in my opinion, would not be indicative of a good submissive because it is manipulative, unethical, and it stinks of being non-consensual. Provoking a dominant is not a good idea.

#15
As I mentioned with respect to good dominants, domination is likened to surgery, it is a highly refined skill in a highly that takes a long time to learn and master. Good Doms exercise their skill in a highly controlled, thoughtful manner. A good submissive would not deliberately disturb a dominant's emotional balance, as it would be quite dangerous. Even though many dominants exhibit immense amount self-control, we are still human; when we are injured, we hurt. Many subs will say that a raging, out-of-control dominant is definitely terrifying. A dominant friend of mine was purposely provoked by his sub to the point of losing control. He was quite shaken and sorrowful after SM scene was over. It took over two years before he could regain his confidence. I am not going to go into any detail here other than the fact he did erupt. A submissive should not engage seriously in being a smart-assed masochist, unless he or she knows the dominant can deal with that. As I mentioned earlier, being a SAM can be quite hot and erotic under the right circumstances. Under the wrong circumstances, it can be quite disastrous. As I have I said a good and true submissive also has to exercise self-control like a good dominant.

#16
I strongly feel that a good submissive would not engage in the behavior of resistance, at least, until he or she got to know their dominant quite well. Resistance on a submissive's part, especially, if the dominant does not know him or her well can send mixed messages, which can be quite difficult to interpret. When I am in a dominant role in a SM scene with a novice submissive, I will tell my partner that any physical resistance on her part will essentially be successful. I will regard such behavior as a yellow light, or even an immediate termination of the scene. There are some subs that enjoy being forced, and this type of behavior being exhibited can essentially ruin a session, as well as, cost me an occasional play partner. To overcome physical resistance, even if it can be done quite easily, in the mistaken assumption that it is play resistance can definitely lead to disastrous results. I submit that physical resistance must be carefully pre-negotiated. I strongly suggest that any dominant, which is in doubt, back off immediately. Like being a smart-assed masochist, resistance can be erotically hot if engaged in under the right circumstances.

#17
Topping from below is another behavior that I feel that good subs should refrain. This denotes a submissive trying to control the scene in progress by making excessive requests, suggestions, and complaints. Of course, this is quite different from the sub that makes suggestions and requests to the dominant, yet leaving it for him or her to decide. It is also different from asking for particular activities, or ruling out particular activities during pre-scene negotiations. Topping from the bottom is typically frowned upon. A submissive should let the dominants make as many decisions as reasonably possible, as the submissive is there to please the dominant.

#18
I talked about dominant masochists and submissive sadists on DS and SM archetypes. A submissive sadist enjoys serving their partner by providing them exactly the kind of pain they desire, or as a dominant masochist which connotes those who enjoy receiving exactly, and only the kind of pain they desire. I will say that these personas work well as long as both partners agree in advance that this is the type of scene they want to do. There is an ethical use of the topping from the bottom behavior, which is when an experienced sub is respectfully offering suggestions to a novice dominant. I know that beginner dominants often feel quite insecure, being trained by their more experienced submissive. In my years as a dominant, I have seen few cases where the novice dominant went on to become excellent and outstanding. Also I have seen a few cases where the submissive was abusive to the novice Dom and he or she essentially never realizes his or her potential. I knew one or two to actually leave the SM or DS community entirely. As in the other behaviors I mentioned in the above paragraphs, topping from the bottom can also be erotic and hot under the proper circumstances. Many of you may or may not agree with what I am about say here. I strongly believe that a dominant that can relinquish control and reclaim it at the appropriate time essentially controls control, the essence of power, if you please. A good and true submissive will topping from the bottom in a constructive, circumspect, and respectful manner with regards to a novice dominant.

#19
My vision of the ideal submissive is one who will be able to discern between strength and stubbornness, with a preference for the former. I love that woman who possesses the fiery, feisty nature that dwells deep within her bosom, sassy defiance, if you will. But I also desire a submissive that has strong sense of self-worth, a woman who is happy with herself and can honestly communicate what it is that she desires. My ideal sub will cherish the romance and be totally enthralled by a perilous, dramatic fantasy. She will be unified and complete, special and significant, and she will possess the immense courage to listen to the spirit beyond what she is.

OP- you raise a number of points, many of which would have made good thread topics on their own. Put together, they are a clusterfuck. Are you really asking for comments on 19 different theses at once? Your OP is rambling and disorganised. It's too bad because, like i said, you raise a number of interesting points. In my opinion, you would have done better to develop any ONE of these ideas, than to present them all at once together in the form of a manifesto. Having said that, if you did that, i would probably comment on any one of these threads, if they were started. But this is far too many ideas to be discussed at once.

pam

< Message edited by gungadin09 -- 7/31/2011 12:36:32 AM >

(in reply to Masterdx2001)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: The Natural submissive - 7/31/2011 5:09:09 AM   
gungadin09


Posts: 3232
Joined: 3/19/2010
Status: offline
Okay, no, they're not all interesting points, but there were one or two in there that could have made good threads.

pam

< Message edited by gungadin09 -- 7/31/2011 5:11:31 AM >

(in reply to gungadin09)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: The Natural submissive - 7/31/2011 7:24:01 AM   
TitanAurelius


Posts: 2
Joined: 12/7/2009
Status: offline
Great post MasterDX.
Well put, as well as a great read.

(in reply to JstAnotherSub)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: The Natural submissive - 7/31/2011 5:22:22 PM   
DeviantlyD


Posts: 4375
Joined: 5/26/2007
From: Hawai`i
Status: offline
I can answer my own question and wow!!! JWriter has AT LEAST 10 other profiles on here!!!! I thought she might have had a total of 3 or 4, but 11????? Why not close them up if you no longer want to use that profile? 11 is...well...do I even need to say it?









quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD

JWriter, how many different profiles do you have on this site...and why more than one?

I'm the inquisitive type. ;)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD

JWriter, how many different profiles do you have on this site...and why more than one?

I'm the inquisitive type. ;)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JWriter

quote:

But that's not the same as saying someone shouldn't make public statements if they want to.


If they want to make a public statement, it should be in answer to a question, in their journal, on their profile, in their introduction, or, under a thread entitled "Public Statements". This is a thread for questions. It doesn't say "Public Statements for Masters" It says "Ask a Master."

I want to see the question.




_____________________________

ExiledTyrant's groupie. Catering to his ego since May 26, 2007. :D

(in reply to DeviantlyD)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: The Natural submissive - 7/31/2011 7:25:27 PM   
DecadentDesire


Posts: 234
Joined: 6/18/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: leadership527
That being said, there are VERY good reasons why dominants don't talk about dominance. Especially here it would be much like slathering yourself with seal blubber and going swimming in shark infested waters.


At least, the seal blubber makes you nice and warm.


_____________________________

I was once a Rabbit, driven Mad, by the Decadence of his Desires...

(in reply to leadership527)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: The Natural submissive - 8/1/2011 3:01:47 AM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD

I can answer my own question and wow!!! JWriter has AT LEAST 10 other profiles on here!!!! I thought she might have had a total of 3 or 4, but 11????? Why not close them up if you no longer want to use that profile? 11 is...well...do I even need to say it?


Eh? Why on earth would someone bother with 11 profiles? Unless it were to get around people's use of the "hide" button? Or Mod bans?

Or a substantial multiple personality disorder?

"Tonight Mathew, I'm going to be ..." :)

(in reply to DeviantlyD)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: The Natural submissive - 8/1/2011 4:34:48 AM   
HannahLynHeather


Posts: 2950
Joined: 4/4/2011
From: where it's at
Status: offline
i think its more a case of just not actually deleting the fucking profile when she leaves in a huff. then when she comes back she makes a whole new profile. the old ones haven't been signed into in ages, so she's not actively using the fuckers.


_____________________________

clique? i don't need no stinking clique!

fuck a duck ~w. disney

My Twitter: http://twitter.com/HannahFuck

i hope you enjoyed the post, and as always my friends....have a nice day

(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: The Natural submissive - 8/1/2011 4:38:32 AM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather

i think its more a case of just not actually deleting the fucking profile when she leaves in a huff. then when she comes back she makes a whole new profile. the old ones haven't been signed into in ages, so she's not actively using the fuckers.


Oh sure, no argument on that score. But are you therefore saying she's spat the dummy 10 times previously?

That's a lot of rattles chucked.

(in reply to HannahLynHeather)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: The Natural submissive - 8/1/2011 4:49:59 AM   
HannahLynHeather


Posts: 2950
Joined: 4/4/2011
From: where it's at
Status: offline
it would seem so. 

_____________________________

clique? i don't need no stinking clique!

fuck a duck ~w. disney

My Twitter: http://twitter.com/HannahFuck

i hope you enjoyed the post, and as always my friends....have a nice day

(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: The Natural submissive - 8/1/2011 5:12:48 AM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather

it would seem so. 


I mean I could see 2, or maybe 3 ... but 11? Assuming that's true of course.

I've only ever been me. I appreciate I'm not everyone's cup of Earl Grey*, but people can take me or leave me, as is their choice. I wouldn't ever dream of coming back under another profile coz ... well, what's the point? Everyone would know it's me (I would think), so what would I have proved?

""Hello? Is that the Ministry Of Understatement? I'd like to report a Class One breech, stat!"

(in reply to HannahLynHeather)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: The Natural submissive - 8/1/2011 5:43:48 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD
I can answer my own question and wow!!! JWriter has AT LEAST 10 other profiles on here!!!! I thought she might have had a total of 3 or 4, but 11????? Why not close them up if you no longer want to use that profile? 11 is...well...do I even need to say it?

Almost makes you wonder if that's some kind of CM record. 


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to DeviantlyD)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: The Natural submissive - 8/1/2011 8:51:15 AM   
BitaTruble


Posts: 9779
Joined: 1/12/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JWriter

Except that the section guidelines clearly indicate that the point is to "open the discussion" and public statements are not something to open a discussion.

I think you missed this part of the guideline (note: a guideline is not a rule.)

Experienced Masters are also encouraged to share their advice and knowledge regardless of if a question has been asked to prompt response.

Who, what, where, when, why and how someone posts is up to them.. not you. You're just going to have to get used to it or feel free start your own forum where you can dictate those things.



< Message edited by BitaTruble -- 8/1/2011 8:58:28 AM >


_____________________________

"Oh, so it's just like
Rock, paper, scissors."

He laughed. "You are the wisest woman I know."


(in reply to JWriter)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: The Natural submissive - 8/1/2011 8:01:44 PM   
erieangel


Posts: 2237
Joined: 6/19/2011
Status: offline
quote:

Especially here it would be much like slathering yourself with seal blubber and going swimming in shark infested waters.



I know some guys who would benefit from swimming in shark infested waters.

(in reply to BitaTruble)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: The Natural submissive Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125