RE: Paranoia, sustainability and Bachmann (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Sanity -> RE: Paranoia, sustainability and Bachmann (8/5/2011 6:36:44 PM)


Some woman going on and on about the cost of another womans hair and makeup is catty

Pointing out a lpoliticians hypocrisy is just politics

Its no surprise that youre thoroughly confused though, rarely do you make any sense about anything you try to chime in on



quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

so lefties and women are catty and hypocrites but the sane one is perfect, gotcha
total delusion breakout in 3-2-1
Boooooooooooooooom
snorts





imperatrixx -> RE: Paranoia, sustainability and Bachmann (8/5/2011 6:42:27 PM)

That mother Jones article was written by someone named Andy.

Possibly a woman...but most likely a man. Care to retract your sexism?




Lucylastic -> RE: Paranoia, sustainability and Bachmann (8/5/2011 7:35:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Some woman going on and on about the cost of another womans hair and makeup is catty

Pointing out a lpoliticians hypocrisy is just politics

Its no surprise that youre thoroughly confused though, rarely do you make any sense about anything you try to chime in on



quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

so lefties and women are catty and hypocrites but the sane one is perfect, gotcha
total delusion breakout in 3-2-1
Boooooooooooooooom
snorts



Michelle Obama isnt a politician, you were whinning about her weight and looks, not her husband.
Um Michelle bachman is a politician, so its all fair in this time of "fiscal restraint" *snorts*.
Do you not get that?
No wonder you cannot understand me,
Good old plain English is your bugaboo
Your definitions aren't English, not even American English.




Sanity -> RE: Paranoia, sustainability and Bachmann (8/5/2011 9:01:51 PM)


I am sexist to the core and make no apologies for it

Many women are by nature very catty, many women revel in their cattiness

Why should I retract something that is the plain truth

Edited to add, I wasnt referring to Andy

quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx

That mother Jones article was written by someone named Andy.

Possibly a woman...but most likely a man. Care to retract your sexism?




Real0ne -> RE: Paranoia, sustainability and Bachmann (8/5/2011 10:24:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/08/michele-bachmann-light-bulbs-agenda-21?page=1

Does any of this sound familiar?


yeh why?




erieangel -> RE: Paranoia, sustainability and Bachmann (8/6/2011 1:44:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


That heat is desirable for two thirds of the year in Northern climates, theyre even used specifically for their heat in certain applications

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

yes, traditional incandescants are going away. However nothing is preventing manufacturers from releasing energy efficient incandescant bulbs. BTW do you know how much energy is wasted as heat from a traditional incandescant compared to how much energy is actually transfrmed into light?


The prob is, sanity, that they aren't all that efficient in converting electricity to usable (for residential purposes) heat either. Add that to the fact that light bulbs tend to be at the top of a room and heat rises and it's just not a good use of energy.
The only thing I can think of that is more inefficient is "ceiling heat" which was popular in the 50's/early 60's. All that did was make your attic hot.


Yeah, and not only that, his comment is pure asswipe at any rate.

Here in northern climates, we use infra-red heaters, if we use electricity for any heat. A fucking 100W bulb wouldnt keep a fuckin fly warm if they were crawling on the fuckin thing. 


Works great in an Easy Bake Oven, though. My daughter had one when she was a kid.





SilverMark -> RE: Paranoia, sustainability and Bachmann (8/6/2011 2:51:24 AM)

I'd hate to add any actual praticallity to one of our debates here, but when I go into a new store, one of the first things I do now, is change the lighting. When I first arrived here, I changed all 450 of the 60 watt incandesent spotlights,(also got rid of the canisters, metal generates heat as well) to 23 watt natural light flourescent with a 9000 hour lifetime.(guess what Wil, I have yet to have to change them in over 1 and1/2 years)
Amazingly, it cut the energy costs(total electric, it is Florida) by a little less $1000.00 per month durring the summer time(less heat, less A/C costs) and over $700. 00 a month in the winter months.(23 watt vs. 60 in 450 bulbs)....Sorry guys, the lights actually work! The lighting is also more of a natural light for the display of the color of the fabrics on the upholstered goods.
Wish I could claim I was that smart and it was all my idea, but, I have a friend who is a lighting expert....of course I did take all the credit!....[8D]




rulemylife -> RE: Paranoia, sustainability and Bachmann (8/6/2011 4:33:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Many women are by nature very catty, many women revel in their cattiness



Certain guys too.

Some even revel in it by having it as their avatar.





Moonhead -> RE: Paranoia, sustainability and Bachmann (8/6/2011 4:49:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Many women are by nature very catty, many women revel in their cattiness

You shouldn't talk about the moderators like that.




Hillwilliam -> RE: Paranoia, sustainability and Bachmann (8/6/2011 5:53:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity



Pointing out a lpoliticians hypocrisy is just politics unless they are a Democrat, then it's fair game.
quote:



I fixed it for ya






imperatrixx -> RE: Paranoia, sustainability and Bachmann (8/6/2011 8:50:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Edited to add, I wasnt referring to Andy


yeah i kind of figured you were referring to a woman direct-quoting a small fraction of what a man wrote as your proof that women were catty. that's why i called you sexist.




Sanity -> RE: Paranoia, sustainability and Bachmann (8/6/2011 11:22:52 AM)


He is a moron, which is why most people ignore his posts

quote:

ORIGINAL: erieangel


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


That heat is desirable for two thirds of the year in Northern climates, theyre even used specifically for their heat in certain applications

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

yes, traditional incandescants are going away. However nothing is preventing manufacturers from releasing energy efficient incandescant bulbs. BTW do you know how much energy is wasted as heat from a traditional incandescant compared to how much energy is actually transfrmed into light?


The prob is, sanity, that they aren't all that efficient in converting electricity to usable (for residential purposes) heat either. Add that to the fact that light bulbs tend to be at the top of a room and heat rises and it's just not a good use of energy.
The only thing I can think of that is more inefficient is "ceiling heat" which was popular in the 50's/early 60's. All that did was make your attic hot.


Yeah, and not only that, his comment is pure asswipe at any rate.

Here in northern climates, we use infra-red heaters, if we use electricity for any heat. A fucking 100W bulb wouldnt keep a fuckin fly warm if they were crawling on the fuckin thing. 


Works great in an Easy Bake Oven, though. My daughter had one when she was a kid.






kalikshama -> RE: Paranoia, sustainability and Bachmann (8/7/2011 3:54:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Edited to add, I wasnt referring to Andy


yeah i kind of figured you were referring to a woman direct-quoting a small fraction of what a man wrote as your proof that women were catty. that's why i called you sexist.


And I was responding to the person who originally brought up the topic of MB's hair - DomYngBlack, a man.




DomYngBlk -> RE: Paranoia, sustainability and Bachmann (8/7/2011 4:52:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/07/michele-bachmann-hair-make-up-bill

"According to Bachmann's latest campaign finance filings, her campaign spent nearly $4,700 on hair and makeup in the weeks after she entered the presidential race on June 13. Records show her campaign made three payments of $1,715, $250, and $2,704 to a Maryland-based stylist named Tamara Robertson."




Fair warning...No golden showers for her..god knows what lays beneath tthat makeup




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875