|
Anaxagoras -> RE: There was a plane! (8/13/2011 9:35:07 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Rule
quote:
ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
I didn't dismiss the 9/11 troofer claims, I considered them, looked at the debunker replies and saw their explanations were stronger.
Stop pulling in stuff that is extraneous to this thread. You don't hear me talking about the mating habits of penguins either, do you?
WTF its not extraneous! You have lost it Rule. It was you challenged me about truth and I stated how I came to my views.
quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
No people who look for probable explanations because they are likely to be the truth are sane, quite unlike yourself.
Why, thank you. It is better to be insane, you know, if one wants to discern truth.
You need to improve your reading skills. Insanity is actually defined by many as an inability to discern the truth from imagination. That describes you prefectly, my friend.
quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
What a shame it is that you look like one of those individuals in some respects.
Not at all. It reflects rather well on them, I would think.
So you agree with far-right conspiracy theory, surprise, surprise! Your view holds even less value now, if that is possible!
quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
Wow Rule is a mind reading parrot expert too... [:D]
I have an interest - albeit rather weak - in ethology.
So you're an expert on parrots too! Well, well, is there anything you're not an expert on? [:D]
quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
I don't think so. You lobbed quite a few personal attacks on my character.
Oh? You cannot think independently and lack creativity. How is that an attack on your character? It is merely who you are. There are billions of people just like you.
You were attacking me by focusing not on arguments but on personality in a critical fashion. It has been the substance of your posts on here. I replied by criticising you back.
quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
Not at all, you claim to be an expert on foreskins so I thought you would take it as a compliment! [:D] It is way nicer than Moon's "Foreskin Boy" is it not?
I don't mind. It is just that it seemed a rather desperate and ill-considered move on your part.
Why? You are noted on this forum for believing all sorts of strange theories on circumcision. Others have said similar.
quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
Avatar came out years later. CGI in many cases looks realistic but not completely so especially with regard to natural movement.
Denial that video material can be tampered with. I see. Indeed, not an expert.
I'm not denying video material can be tampered with. However, it is not easy to do convincingly. Furthermore, the events were reported live with a large array of news outlets form multiple independent sources.
quote:
The over-arching weakness of the TV fakery argument is this: how could the perpetrators have ensured control over all the images taken of the planes that approached the WTC? Only one unmodified image posted to the web would have exposed the operation. New York is a media capital of the world, with national networks, local network affiliates and independent TV stations, international media bureaus, and many independent video companies like the kinds I've worked for, and professional photographers. Professionals would have been rushing out to document whatever they could, through professional pride or the hope for making a buck off it. Evan Fairbanks and war photographer James Nachtway are some examples. And then there are also cameras in the possession of ordinary citizens and the thousands of New York's ever-present tourists. In addition, one should consider the possibility of foreign intelligence assets acquiring their own images of the attack (which so many knew was coming) which could be used for blackmail.
http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/review.html
|
|
|
|
