quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
here is a neet teaching tool for freefall and demoition.

since highschool level is to well high, here is grade school level.

http://science.howstuffworks.com/engineering/structural/building-implosion.htm

you can play blow up the building!  wow!

quote:

Sometimes, though, a building is surrounded by structures that must be preserved. In this case, the blasters proceed with a true implosion, demolishing the building so that it collapses straight down into its own footprint (the total area at the base of the building). This feat requires such skill that only a handful of demolition companies in the world will attempt it.

I have to ponder how one would go about teaching an idiot...  Hmmm...

More of your moronic shit, where you even claim WTC7 imploded! None of the fucking Towers imploded into their own footprints. Imposion is done to avoid damage to surrounding structures. Tower 7 caused huge damage to the Deutsche Bank Building, the Verizon Building, World Financial Center and others. The cost of repair was immense, going well into the billions. The substantial damage to the Verizon building alone cost 1.4 billion alone to repair.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
Again I have to remind R0 that we acknowledged Tower 7 only reached free-fall for 1/8th of the decent.

yep just like a demolition.

quote:


fuck you people are asshelmets.

there are shit loads of videos out there that show side by side comparisons of 7 and a building brought down by demolition and they fall identical.

what a bunch of fucktards.

I posted a video about 100 pages of your phlunktard propaganda ago that shows it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
here is a neet teaching tool for freefall and demoition.

since highschool level is to well high, here is grade school level.

http://science.howstuffworks.com/engineering/structural/building-implosion.htm

you can play blow up the building!  wow!

quote:

Sometimes, though, a building is surrounded by structures that must be preserved. In this case, the blasters proceed with a true implosion, demolishing the building so that it collapses straight down into its own footprint (the total area at the base of the building). This feat requires such skill that only a handful of demolition companies in the world will attempt it.

I have to ponder how one would go about teaching an idiot...  Hmmm...

More of your moronic shit, where you even claim WTC7 imploded! None of the fucking Towers imploded into their own footprints. Imposion is done to avoid damage to surrounding structures. Tower 7 caused huge damage to the Deutsche Bank Building, the Verizon Building, World Financial Center and others. The cost of repair was immense, going well into the billions. The substantial damage to the Verizon building alone cost 1.4 billion alone to repair.

sure they did, like everything else on thsi subject you are too fucking stoopid to know what in their own foot print means.  you think little elves stack it all neatly like chord wood.

quote:


have you considered taking up macrame?

Somehting more suited to your talents?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
here is a neet teaching tool for freefall and demoition.

since highschool level is to well high, here is grade school level.

http://science.howstuffworks.com/engineering/structural/building-implosion.htm

you can play blow up the building!  wow!

quote:

Sometimes, though, a building is surrounded by structures that must be preserved. In this case, the blasters proceed with a true implosion, demolishing the building so that it collapses straight down into its own footprint (the total area at the base of the building). This feat requires such skill that only a handful of demolition companies in the world will attempt it.

I have to ponder how one would go about teaching an idiot...  Hmmm...

More of your moronic shit, where you even claim WTC7 imploded! None of the fucking Towers imploded into their own footprints. Imposion is done to avoid damage to surrounding structures. Tower 7 caused huge damage to the Deutsche Bank Building, the Verizon Building, World Financial Center and others. The cost of repair was immense, going well into the billions. The substantial damage to the Verizon building alone cost 1.4 billion alone to repair.

sure they did, like everything else on thsi subject you are too fucking stoopid to know what in their own foot print means.  you think little elves stack it all neatly like chord wood.

Implosions do sometimes cause damage but they blow the great majority of the material inward which means real damage to surrounding buildings is unusual unless something goes very wrong. As a ruke implosions do not cause very extensive damage to other buildings. This video debunks your batshit: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsUYhrXonXQ&

quote:


have you considered taking up macrame?

Somehting more suited to your talents?

I doubt anything that complex would suit your talents!

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
You obviously dont understand that the WTC controlled demolitions were intentionally designed NOT to fall in their own footprints, NOT to fall at freefall speeds and SILENT explosives were used. Sheeessh. How gullible you are.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
See that is where you shit house physicists get all fucked up.

The paramount matter is not how long it took for the building to come down.

It is the fact (and you both agreed) that it reached a condition freefall.

 PERIOD

That said

Sundar said; freefall is when there is no structural support

demolition creates a condition of no structual support.

you already admitted it freefell, you pal admitted it freefell

you have no alternative explation for how that can heppen but demolition. 

Therefore without an alternative method for creating a global  freefall condition I am forced to conclude demolition.

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

You obviously dont understand that the WTC controlled demolitions were intentionally designed NOT to fall in their own footprints, NOT to fall at freefall speeds and SILENT explosives were used. Sheeessh. How gullible you are.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

I just stopped by to suggest a new name for this thread :

Star Trek 168 : The return to primordial goop

T^T

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
Oh come on!

You mean your phlunky debunker site cant answer this for you?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
See that is where you shit house physicists get all fucked up.

The paramount matter is not how long it took for the building to come down.

It is the fact (and you both agreed) that it reached a condition freefall.

 PERIOD

That said

Sundar said; freefall is when there is no structural support

demolition creates a condition of no structual support.

you already admitted it freefell, you pal admitted it freefell

you have no alternative explation for how that can heppen but demolition. 

Therefore without an alternative method for creating a global  freefall condition I am forced to conclude demolition.

quote:


see debunker debate results here

Isnt that a fucking bitch? 

You didnt listen! -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKaQzQAlNn4

you can be a demolition expert too!

All you need it s debunker site here and your finger on the button here  and your head in the right frame of mind here.   

quote:


This is not going to change forever because it is the correct answer, bitch cry whine fart eat shit dont matter you and your ilk will have this same question shoved in your face or up your ass which ever you prefer till hall freezes over or until you can give an adequate answer which we all know you cant because demolition IS the only way this can be accomplished.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
I just stopped by to suggest a new name for this thread :

Star Trek 168 : The return to primordial goop

T^T

yup they act just like corrnered rodents

OI have them by the balls and they know it they all claimed there were other ways and when I asked the ad nauseum what other ways they keep changing the subject or going back to fall time rather than the fact that it freefell whi is the whole point and the only point under consideration.  LOL

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
I never said it was an alternative to demolition. You need to follow the thread of the argument. I had said "If it was a global failure, it would go into free-fall throughout the collapse."

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

I am in the habit of ignoring retards.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
I never said it was an alternative to demolition. You need to follow the thread of the argument. I had said "If it was a global failure, it would go into free-fall throughout the collapse."

I am in the habit of ignoring retards.

that is equally as idiotic as your footprint foolishness

lets see your data that shows YOUR CLAIM IS THE ONLY WAY.

quote:

Building 7 Compared to the Twin Towers: The destruction of Building 7 exhibited numerous tell-tale signs of a conventional controlled demolition: The building sank into its footprint at near free-fall speed.

quote:

The fact that the towers collapsed in about 10 seconds is clear evidence that the upper portion of each of the towers passed through the lower portion at about the same rate that it would have fallen through air. The fact that the towers fell this quickly (essentially at the rate of free-fall) is conclusive evidence that they were deliberately demolished.

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
I am in the habit of ignoring retards.

Ignoring yourself is quite a trick. You must have mastered meditation too.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
I am in the habit of ignoring retards.

Ignoring yourself is quite a trick. You must have mastered meditation too.

Very true! Besides which if he claims he has a habit is of ignoring other retards besides himself, how come he hasn't ignored me over the past 30 or so pages, if he believes me to be a retard? I would say that in itself, that contradiction, and the claim thereof, is rather "retarded".

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
I never said it was an alternative to demolition. You need to follow the thread of the argument. I had said "If it was a global failure, it would go into free-fall throughout the collapse."

that is equally as idiotic as your footprint foolishness

you did not say the same thing. 

I pick up on all your subtle bullshit mischaraterizations.

Thats why I usually dont bother answering them.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
Of course if there was global failure which would be absolute failure simultaneously throughout the structure, it would collapse throughout at free-fall. That is the whole intention of demolition jobs! They blow out all the structural supports at once so it falls at free-fall. That is the very thing all his conspiracist friends including Chandler contend. I've lost count how many times I have said this to R0.

thats correct but that is not an alternative to demolition.

(in reply to Real0ne)