tweakabelle -> RE: Rush Limbaugh: Obama's Enemies List (8/11/2011 5:05:04 AM)
|
quote:
Rush Limbaugh was addicted to painkillers once These are the sort of arguments that have come to typify many of the leftists here, which is the point of the thread And those making this sort of argument are what leftists in general falsely claim about people like Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter, though the conservative arguments are far more intellectual than these guttural noises that certain leftist ideologues normally make on any given day I was making the point that Limbaugh was a hypocrite - but, do forgive me please Sanity, it was obviously far too subtle for you. While we have your attention, you might like to give us an example of what you consider to be an "intellectual" argument you've advanced recently - for the life of me I can't remember any. While it's possible to make an "intellectual argument" succinctly, it usually takes more than the single line or two that characterise Sanity's posts. Nor do intellectual arguments rely on the wild unsubstantiated claims, factual distortions and errors, ideologically-driven slurs and gross exaggerations that typically adorn his posts. For example here, unedited, are the first 4 of Sanity's contributions to this thread: "I take exception to this - its obviously not just Obama who is full of hate and vindictiveness Its practically the entire left " post #1 "I bet you that Obama has added everyone on Wall Street to his long and growing enemies list by the end of the day... "Assuming they werent already on it " post #3 "The very GAWD of the "leftys" post #9 "I dont hate anyone, why would I hate a clown. Everyone loves a clown... Seriously, you must be projecting your hatred of Bush and Rush and all the others on the lefttists enemies list onto me But I am nothing like you, I hate no one. Life is to short to allow yourself to hate And Rush is rather a jovial fellow as well, I doubt that he really hates (though he might, I dont know). " post #15. Need I go on? There are some more in the same vein and displaying the same level of "intellectual" thought and analysis .... Triumphs of rhetoric over content or thought. Is this what Sanity is holding up as an example of "intellectual argument"? Such, typically, are Sanity's contributions - vacuous, irritating uninformed provocations repeated ad infinitum; possessing the level of intellectual sophistication one might associate with a retarded amoeba and about as intellectually stimulating and charming as a cobra's bite.
|
|
|
|