crxmale -> RE: cock milking (6/5/2009 12:46:34 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Racquelle The belief that a male must ejaculate of have the prostate emptied for medical reasons seems flawed on many points. Remember, little boys go until puberty without ejaculation, men go without for sometimes decades, by choice (as in priests), and after some loss of erectile function or loss of libido... The medical claims made here or elsewhere are dubious at best. If there is indeed a lower incidence of prostate cancer among Asian men, my bet is it is more associated with genetics and/or a lifetime diet that includes fewer artificial preservatives. There are many differing cultures in Asia, and sex practices are far from universal. I enjoy milking a sub for several reasons, and they have enjoyed it for several reasons. As with all sex acts, how we each perceive milking is deeply influenced by the dynamic of the encounter, and just plain old preference. For some men it is arousing, satisfying, etc. Others find it insulting, degrading and unpleasant - and of course we know, that is often our desired result in D/s play. It takes practice. It takes patience. It takes communication. The rectal tissue is delicate, so it also takes care. Why would a physician need to milk a prostate? I bet it has a lot to do with not wanting to wait around for the the guy to jerk off, and not wanting to hang out while he is doing it. In most cases the Doc is checking for prostate enlargement, a sign of possible prostate cancer.
|
|
|
|