TheHeretic -> RE: Vote (8/14/2011 7:00:32 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LanceHughes Voters and non-voters never "abdicate the right to complain." Anybody can complain about the results whether they voted or not. The original line is a fine example of the "Error of the Converse." What TheHeritic (and so many others that say this line) could shorten it to say "If you haven't voted, don't complain." V = voted; ~V = not voted C = content with results; ~C = not content (i.e. complaining) The statement of "If you haven't voted, don't complain," translates to logic notation as: ~V => ~C Now we take the contrapositive (which, if the original statement was correct, yields a correct statment.) If the statement above is true, the contrapositive will also be true. C => V So translating back, "If you are complaining, then you voted." As Termy points out "FALSE" The main thing wrong with this statement is that those that are complaining, may or may not have voted. =========== What's the "logically correct" wa y of saying this sentiment? We want to say "Voters are allowed to complain, AND non-voters are not." ( V => C ) ^ ( ~V => ~C) As we just saw, ( ~V => ~C) is the same as C => V That gives us ( V => C ) ^ (C => V) and re-writing that, we have V <=> C In English, "If you voted, complain. If you didn't vote, don't complain." And now we see what that "abdicate your right" is all about. We ALL must take more responsibility for our actions. "Abdicate your right"? WhereTF did that come from? It's like an automatic switch got turned..... bleah. How 'bout short and sweet: Didn't vote? I ain't listenin', fool. Wow. What a long and needlessly complicated way to say, "The Heretic is right, but I don't like his particular phrasing." [;)]
|
|
|
|