Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Obama Gets Teabagged


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 10:57:53 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline 		Dubya is running again? OH , thats right he didn't smoke him out! lol

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 11:15:04 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline 		I kind of laughed watching the tea bagger make an ass of himself. He tried to berate the President over something the Republican Party failed to do for eight years while George W. Bush was in office. The 'balanced budget amendment'? How the hell did the US Budget get out of whack in the first place? Any economists worth his/her weight in gold has pointed the direct correlation between the Bush era tax cuts and the grow of the US Deficit. An each year, that deficit was paid from with borrowed money. An how often did conservatives hold their own party accountible and responsible? That's why its easy to undermine most tea baggers on the concept of being 'fiscal conservative'. All those fiscal conservatives voted Republican in lockstep with other conservatives and never questioned let alone rebelled against voting Republican.

Likewise, when did Vice President Biden call 'the right' or 'conservatives', terrorists? Got a video?

(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 11:15:30 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

She comes across as the epitome of a good christian wife. I have no evidence to the contrary.

She also comes across as what the conservative movement wants in a candidate.  Again, no evidence to the contrary.

Many, many people have complained about Obama bow and scraping... about Bush doing the same... about the lack of spine of both and many other Presidents.

Yet, they are willing to elect a woman who openly admits to these traits?  If her husband decides one day that she should quit.. will she?


Its one thing to speculate about the actions and motivations of a President.  Its another thing knowing them before they are President and voting them in anyways.


I`m voting for the man who got osama bin-laden....nuff said



I didnt know the leader of the Seal Team was running.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 11:16:35 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

Any economists worth his/her weight in gold has pointed the direct correlation between the Bush era tax cuts and the grow of the US Deficit.


Bullshit. Revenues increased during the Bush administration until late 2008.


_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 11:28:10 AM   
Marc2b


Posts: 6660
Joined: 8/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I open my email this morning and what do I see,
This...


Theres not much more I can say until I stop laughing
Have a great day chaps!!!



This gives me a wicked idea.

I dunno if it will work or not ... but I think it's worth the try.

_____________________________

Do you know what the most awesome thing about being an Atheist is? You're not required to hate anybody!

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 1:35:03 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

Any economists worth his/her weight in gold has pointed the direct correlation between the Bush era tax cuts and the grow of the US Deficit.


Bullshit. Revenues increased during the Bush administration until late 2008.


Weird how the numbers show it differently
Year Federal Tax Revenue in billions (2005 dollars)
1999 2106.11
2000 2284.56
2001 2196.46
2002 2011.72
2003 1894.06
2004 1942.84
2005 2153.61
2006 2330.94
2007 2420.48
2008 2326.63
2009 1917.81

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 2:12:04 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Called on his administrations two-faced hypocrisy

Keep in mind this is on his "listening tour" as you watch the video

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/08/obama-clashes-with-tea-party-member/1



Do you ever read or listen to your own links? Or do you just post them based on the headline?

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 2:19:48 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

Any economists worth his/her weight in gold has pointed the direct correlation between the Bush era tax cuts and the grow of the US Deficit.


Bullshit. Revenues increased during the Bush administration until late 2008.


Weird how the numbers show it differently
Year Federal Tax Revenue in billions (2005 dollars)
1999 2106.11
2000 2284.56
2001 2196.46
2002 2011.72
2003 1894.06
2004 1942.84
2005 2153.61
2006 2330.94
2007 2420.48
2008 2326.63
2009 1917.81




funny but I always thought that 2420>2331>2154>1943>1894.

"The economy's performance since the 2003 tax cuts went into effect has been stunning. The unemployment rate has fallen to from 6.3 percent to 4.7 percent-well below the historical average. Companies and entrepreneurs have created 5.7 million new jobs, including another 128,000 in August. And the typical unemployed worker now needs three fewer weeks to find a job than in June 2003.

The 2003 tax cuts lowered taxes on savings and investment, making it easier for workers to save for the future and reducing the cost of investment. The consequences have been dramatic. Since June 2003, investment in the economy has surged by 28 percent in real terms and is higher now than during the late 1990s. The stock market has also recovered, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average up 2,500 points in since June of 2003. With tens of millions of American workers owning stocks through 401(k) plans, these gains have been broadly shared throughout the economy."



< Message edited by willbeurdaddy -- 8/16/2011 2:36:40 PM >

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 2:20:53 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline 		Did I miss something,one minute DomKen is schooling locked over the Chinese Navy...the next Ron and Tazzy are going on about batshit crazy Michele....there is something amiss here.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 2:32:48 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		I think it was a mix up in threads, Mike.  I do remember asking a question about her "submissive" wife bs, but it must have been on another thread.

It happens.


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 3:00:03 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Did I miss something,one minute DomKen is schooling locked over the Chinese Navy...the next Ron and Tazzy are going on about batshit crazy Michele....there is something amiss here.



Hey, Ken adequately described the situation where Chinese Junks are Hauling Chines Junk. A perfect segue into Michelles BigPolishCock fetish.

International theme....you know, right? This is a sex site, right? I mean I did get that part right, didn't I?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 3:30:51 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline 		-

Yes, Obama sucks Tea Partiers balls...

I think its hilarious too




quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I open my email this morning and what do I see,
This...


Theres not much more I can say until I stop laughing
Have a great day chaps!!!



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 3:41:27 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

Any economists worth his/her weight in gold has pointed the direct correlation between the Bush era tax cuts and the grow of the US Deficit.


Bullshit. Revenues increased during the Bush administration until late 2008.


Weird how the numbers show it differently
Year Federal Tax Revenue in billions (2005 dollars)
1999 2106.11
2000 2284.56
2001 2196.46
2002 2011.72
2003 1894.06
2004 1942.84
2005 2153.61
2006 2330.94
2007 2420.48
2008 2326.63
2009 1917.81




funny but I always thought that 2420>2331>2154>1943>1894.

"The economy's performance since the 2003 tax cuts went into effect has been stunning. The unemployment rate has fallen to from 6.3 percent to 4.7 percent-well below the historical average. Companies and entrepreneurs have created 5.7 million new jobs, including another 128,000 in August. And the typical unemployed worker now needs three fewer weeks to find a job than in June 2003.

The 2003 tax cuts lowered taxes on savings and investment, making it easier for workers to save for the future and reducing the cost of investment. The consequences have been dramatic. Since June 2003, investment in the economy has surged by 28 percent in real terms and is higher now than during the late 1990s. The stock market has also recovered, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average up 2,500 points in since June of 2003. With tens of millions of American workers owning stocks through 401(k) plans, these gains have been broadly shared throughout the economy."



You left out FY 2002, the year the tax cuts went into effect. 2011 !< 1894.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 3:58:19 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		I know you are trying to wriggle out of this but ..clearly it means you were the one that were receiving, SNORTS
Id love to see the look on your face , I bet it was priceless.
oh gawd here I go again, the look on your face as he dipps them between your lips, saying SUCK BITCH...
SNORTS oh gawd I am gonna get a hernia if I think about that much longer

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 4:11:04 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

Any economists worth his/her weight in gold has pointed the direct correlation between the Bush era tax cuts and the grow of the US Deficit.


Bullshit. Revenues increased during the Bush administration until late 2008.


Weird how the numbers show it differently
Year Federal Tax Revenue in billions (2005 dollars)
1999 2106.11
2000 2284.56
2001 2196.46
2002 2011.72
2003 1894.06
2004 1942.84
2005 2153.61
2006 2330.94
2007 2420.48
2008 2326.63
2009 1917.81




funny but I always thought that 2420>2331>2154>1943>1894.

"The economy's performance since the 2003 tax cuts went into effect has been stunning. The unemployment rate has fallen to from 6.3 percent to 4.7 percent-well below the historical average. Companies and entrepreneurs have created 5.7 million new jobs, including another 128,000 in August. And the typical unemployed worker now needs three fewer weeks to find a job than in June 2003.

The 2003 tax cuts lowered taxes on savings and investment, making it easier for workers to save for the future and reducing the cost of investment. The consequences have been dramatic. Since June 2003, investment in the economy has surged by 28 percent in real terms and is higher now than during the late 1990s. The stock market has also recovered, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average up 2,500 points in since June of 2003. With tens of millions of American workers owning stocks through 401(k) plans, these gains have been broadly shared throughout the economy."



You left out FY 2002, the year the tax cuts went into effect. 2011 !< 1894.


2002 is when the 2003 tax cuts went into effect? And fiscal policy does take time, yanno, its not instantaneous.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 7:51:44 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
2002 is when the 2003 tax cuts went into effect? And fiscal policy does take time, yanno, its not instantaneous.

The first Bush tax cuts were passed in 2001 and went into efect in FY 2002.

Anyway your claims was
quote:

Revenues increased during the Bush administration until late 2008.

So FY 2002 is the baseline since it was his first budget. And FY 2003 revenue was lower than FY 2002. Which clearly makes your claim wrong.

< Message edited by DomKen -- 8/16/2011 7:54:23 PM >

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 7:54:05 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Weird how the numbers show it differently
Year Federal Tax Revenue in billions (2005 dollars)
1999 2106.11
2000 2284.56
2001 2196.46
2002 2011.72
2003 1894.06
2004 1942.84
2005 2153.61
2006 2330.94
2007 2420.48
2008 2326.63
2009 1917.81




funny but I always thought that 2420>2331>2154>1943>1894.

"The economy's performance since the 2003 tax cuts went into effect has been stunning. The unemployment rate has fallen to from 6.3 percent to 4.7 percent-well below the historical average. Companies and entrepreneurs have created 5.7 million new jobs, including another 128,000 in August. And the typical unemployed worker now needs three fewer weeks to find a job than in June 2003.

The 2003 tax cuts lowered taxes on savings and investment, making it easier for workers to save for the future and reducing the cost of investment. The consequences have been dramatic. Since June 2003, investment in the economy has surged by 28 percent in real terms and is higher now than during the late 1990s. The stock market has also recovered, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average up 2,500 points in since June of 2003. With tens of millions of American workers owning stocks through 401(k) plans, these gains have been broadly shared throughout the economy."



You left out FY 2002, the year the tax cuts went into effect. 2011 !< 1894.


2002 is when the 2003 tax cuts went into effect? And fiscal policy does take time, yanno, its not instantaneous.

The first Bush tax cuts were passed in 2001 and went into efect in FY 2002.


Read my post and go away little girl.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 7:56:04 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
The first Bush tax cuts were passed in 2001 and went into efect in FY 2002.


Read my post and go away little girl.

Once again, you claimed
quote:

Revenues increased during the Bush administration until late 2008.

Since Bush's first budget was FY 2002 that is the baseline and FY 2003 revenues were lower than FY 2002.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 7:59:50 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
The first Bush tax cuts were passed in 2001 and went into efect in FY 2002.


Read my post and go away little girl.

Once again, you claimed
quote:

Revenues increased during the Bush administration until late 2008.

Since Bush's first budget was FY 2002 that is the baseline and FY 2003 revenues were lower than FY 2002.


And once the Clinton recession's effects finally wore off and the 2001 AND 2003 tax cuts came into effect they did.

What part of go away little girl didnt you understand? No one buys your semantic games anymore, dont you realize that?

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Obama Gets Teabagged - 8/16/2011 8:00:43 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
The first Bush tax cuts were passed in 2001 and went into efect in FY 2002.


Read my post and go away little girl.

Once again, you claimed
quote:

Revenues increased during the Bush administration until late 2008.

Since Bush's first budget was FY 2002 that is the baseline and FY 2003 revenues were lower than FY 2002.


And once the Clinton recession's effects finally wore off and the 2001 AND 2003 tax cuts came into effect they did.

What part of go away little girl didnt you understand? No one buys your semantic games anymore, dont you realize that?

You made a claim and you were wrong. What part of that isn't sinking into your tiny little brain?

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.093