RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN???

RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Icarys -> RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? (8/18/2011 1:53:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4u Can that really be true ? Someone,smarter than me,should take a hard look at those numbers. Easily anyone except Lucy. Zing....Two for one!

Lucylastic -> RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? (8/18/2011 1:55:31 PM)
golf clap Light travels faster than sound. That’s why some people appear bright until you hear them speak

Icarys -> RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? (8/18/2011 1:58:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic golf clap Light travels faster than sound. That’s why some people appear bright until you hear them speak Nice explanation to the Lucy phenomenon.

Lucylastic -> RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? (8/18/2011 2:02:06 PM)
I grew out of Im rubber you are glue when I was 12, give it a try you might get a lil more respect, its doubtful but ya never know. grow up, let your balls drop its natural... it leads to being smarter at least for some males

DomYngBlk -> RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? (8/18/2011 2:04:49 PM)
LOL now that was funny

Lucylastic -> RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? (8/18/2011 2:06:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk LOL now that was funny unfortunately I have to tear myself away from the pit of hilarity for a while:) tip your waitress:)

flcouple2009 -> RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? (8/18/2011 2:09:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk As usual dropping to the insult when you know you can't prove your claim. Its fine. You do what you want. But dont whine people call bullshit on your bullshit. That's his game. He drags out things which use quotes from places like the "Heritage Foundation" and when you ask where you can find this information besides a right wing blog he gets pissy and starts dropping insults. It means exactly what you think. He's got nothing but his "ideological blinders" or his "confirmation bias".

DomYngBlk -> RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? (8/18/2011 2:13:56 PM)
Intellectual dishonesty. Logic tells you that regulators don't make up huge numbers of Gov't workers. So to justify saying that the numbers are a lot higher you adjust your graph parameters and stick to percentages rather than hard numbers. It makes it look good but it isn't truthful. And your right. Then he runs off and never returns to the thread or sicks Treasure on the thread to add in. ......

Icarys -> RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? (8/18/2011 2:18:00 PM)
quote: I grew out of Im rubber you are glue when I was 12, Sure that's obvious lol Do you actually believe this shit as you are writing it or is it.. "I can't let Icarys see me sweat".. [:D]

farglebargle -> RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? (8/18/2011 4:13:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: flcouple2009 quote: ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk As usual dropping to the insult when you know you can't prove your claim. Its fine. You do what you want. But dont whine people call bullshit on your bullshit. That's his game. He drags out things which use quotes from places like the "Heritage Foundation" and when you ask where you can find this information besides a right wing blog he gets pissy and starts dropping insults. It means exactly what you think. He's got nothing but his "ideological blinders" or his "confirmation bias". "Religious Zealotry"... Let's call the "Tea Party" what it is. The Christian Taliban who want to bring their Holy Law to the land...

FirmhandKY -> RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? (8/18/2011 4:38:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: flcouple2009 quote: ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY You mean ... You could say ... ... that they were "Fake, but Accurate"? [:D] Why don't you have the balls are the integrity to call them what they actually were? skewed to intentionally mislead You missed the humor, methinks. Not surprising. Firm

flcouple2009 -> RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? (8/18/2011 4:47:13 PM)
Not interested in your humor I will say it again. You don't have either the balls or the integrity to just come out and call the Bachman statements what they are. purposely skewed to mislead

DomYngBlk -> RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? (8/18/2011 4:50:32 PM)
I think that is checkmate

FirmhandKY -> RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? (8/18/2011 7:57:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: flcouple2009 Not interested in your humor I will say it again. You don't have either the balls or the integrity to just come out and call the Bachman statements what they are. purposely skewed to mislead I'm not particularly interested in Bachmann or whatever her name is. I don't think you'll find any comment of mine about her in any thread, pro or con. I'm with Hannah, on her post about "what it is all about", and decided to point out another aspect of the entire issue. What you seem to be missing is that I am pointing out that the same "defense" that some of the "lefties" use to defend some rather questionable actions and statements fits the situation in reverse. Assuming that I am agree Bachmann's comment is inaccurate at best. I know ... kinda complicated. Some aren't capable of seeing it. They have their heads so far up their asses that they have to fart to breathe. Firm

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875