RE: Child support (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message

SirKenin -> RE: Child support (5/23/2006 8:28:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster


And be careful, because slander, even on the internet, can have legal repercussions.

What a bullshit empty-headed threat unless LaM runs a business and lost money because of it.  Do not listen to his crap and speak your mind.



caitlyn -> RE: Child support (5/23/2006 10:04:40 AM)

My only comments are about the things that weren't said:
 
Jewish people only make good lawyers.
Only Jewish people make good lawyers.
 
Both of those would have been racist statements.



Lordandmaster -> RE: Child support (5/23/2006 12:41:41 PM)

Yeah.  I'm not going to go over the legal details of libel with you (I doubt you could afford my fee), but I will say this: I don't enjoy being accused of fraudulently misquoting someone.  In my profession--which I'm not about to share with you--accusations like that are not a trivial matter.  Normally I would demand a written retraction and apology.  But since he doesn't know my name (no, I'm not REALLY named Lordandmaster), I'll just take his silence as his boorish mode of acquiescence.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin

What a bullshit empty-headed threat unless LaM runs a business and lost money because of it.  Do not listen to his crap and speak your mind.



candystripper -> RE: Child support (5/23/2006 3:58:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster


And be careful, because slander, even on the internet, can have legal repercussions.

What a bullshit empty-headed threat unless LaM runs a business and lost money because of it.  Do not listen to his crap and speak your mind.


SirKenin; when written it is libel; and it is actionable.  But You are correct; damages must be proven except in very narrow circumstances.
 
candystripper



xxmstrchasxx -> RE: Child support (5/24/2006 10:51:49 PM)

quote:

There is no way anyone is paying 99% of their pay to child support.  The maximum allowed by law - and this is pretty much uniform to all states - is 65% of disposable income (defined as gross less taxes), and that's only if the payor is unmarried, supports no other family, and is at least 12 weeks in arrears.  Otherwise, the maximum is only 50% of disposable.


That may be the way it is now but when I was paying child support,  I paid for one child in Ohio and one child in California and my child support was as much as my whole take home pay.  I went to court because everyone told me too and I told the judge my child support was $600.00 a month and that is all I bring home and  the judge told me I better get a part-time job to live on.



Termyn8or -> RE: Child support (5/24/2006 11:28:09 PM)

I might have to vacate this thread. I done told you I had an Italian lawyer and an Irish one.

Geez, I can't believe this. And I haven't even checked my other monster.

Whip me to within an inch of my life, and let it be done. Whip me over one word. I wish I had never used it.

One word, look for it in the other thread.

T



NeedToUseYou -> RE: Child support (5/24/2006 11:42:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Yeah.  I'm not going to go over the legal details of libel with you (I doubt you could afford my fee), but I will say this: I don't enjoy being accused of fraudulently misquoting someone.  In my profession--which I'm not about to share with you--accusations like that are not a trivial matter.  Normally I would demand a written retraction and apology.  But since he doesn't know my name (no, I'm not REALLY named Lordandmaster), I'll just take his silence as his boorish mode of acquiescence.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin

What a bullshit empty-headed threat unless LaM runs a business and lost money because of it.  Do not listen to his crap and speak your mind.



I have to agree that is a pussy ass move. Threatening to sue over a stupid forum. Wow, LOL, yeah, that's being a big boy.



candystripper -> RE: Child support (5/25/2006 12:27:19 AM)

quote:

I have to agree that is a pussy ass move. Threatening to sue over a stupid forum. Wow, LOL, yeah, that's being a big boy.

NeedToUseYou


Lam never threatened to sue Sir Kenin -- He warned P/pl that suits of that sort have been brought and that there can be repercussions for libeling a poster.  Next time You attack another poster, particularly Lam, read more carefully.
 
candystripper




MsMacComb -> RE: Child support (5/25/2006 12:36:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitaTruble

Can't help you but I'm curious to know why you mentioned that your lawyer is Jewish? What does that have to do with anything?
Celeste
 

My accountant is a cute little half hispanic-half white dyke with an onion. Does that get me anything, lol? [:D]



Wulfchyld -> RE: Child support (5/25/2006 12:38:13 AM)

Tearful tax-returns?



MsMacComb -> RE: Child support (5/25/2006 12:45:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wulfchyld
Tearful tax-returns?
 

Don't tell me you don't know what an "onion" is. That would surprise me, severely. [:)] 

http://www.onionbooty.com/



Lordandmaster -> Good riddance (5/25/2006 8:45:09 AM)

Good.  If I got you to take your racist bullshit and post it somewhere else, I'll call this thread a success.  People come to the Collarme forums to talk about BDSM, to talk about relationships, sometimes to kick back and exchange some humor, and sometimes to talk about things that affect all of us, like religion, politics, current events.  They don't come here to talk about how Jews are taking over the world or to hear someone trying to explain why "nigger" isn't really a bad word.  There are PLENTY of sites for that crap, and Collarme isn't one of them.  Go on and get out of here.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

I might have to vacate this thread.



ModeratorEleven -> RE: Good riddance (5/25/2006 8:49:56 AM)

And that's the sound of the other shoe dropping.

XI



Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.076172E-02