Focus50
Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004 From: Newcastle, Australia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Epytropos I'm gonna have to go with 'not.' To quote from your initial post, with emphasis added: quote:
I'm just gonna assume from your screen name that you're all of 21 - 'cause that's about the level of sense your post makes. As a rule I tend to only accuse people of not making sense when I don't understand them. As to things 'even a 21-year-old' can understand, I suspect that given the fact that upwards of half a dozen people have given him ideas which conform to his desires, myself included, you're likely mistaken. I don't think he ever asserted (or, for that matter, that even you thought he asserted) that there was some way to express it such that there was no way he would ever be found out by a single vanilla soul. He simply wanted something that was unlikely to be found out, and since I kept the BDSM symbol as my Facebook profile picture for upwards of a year without being found out I have to say there is very clearly a way that can be done. My issue is not with your word choice, atrocious as it may be, but rather that in your rush to feel superior you've overlooked reality. Oooh, semantics - now we're getting to the heart of all logic. Let's see, I commented that his post has all the sense of a 21yo. That's not to say I didn't understand it; it's that it's nonsense - as in naive, immature, unrealistic etc - which is what you generally get from 21yo's playing with adult dynamics. And since the rest of your post is more of the same, I'll let you get back to re-visiting your rules.... Focus.
_____________________________
Never underestimate the persuasive power of stupid people in large groups. <unknown> Your food is for eating, not torturing. <my mum> (Errm, when I was a kid)
|