outhere69
Posts: 1302
Joined: 1/25/2011 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: EternalHoH quote:
ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy second, owning a life insurance policy on someone else requires that you have an insurable interest in their living...ie economic loss if they die. The state would have no economic interest in retired teachers continuing to live. Under regulated insurance rules, yes. When derivatives are used, there are no such regulations. As was mentioned yesterday, certain elements of our insurance laws do not apply to the elites. They have their own parallel unregulated insurance instruments that are exempt from regular (regulated) insurance laws. Once upon a time, there was a scandal when Walmart did this...about 10 years ago, I think. Many threads ask opinions or discuss public figures; that doesn't make it a hit thread. I'm personally uncomfortable for Perry's very close ties to dominionist Christianity, which isn't your daddy's fundamentalism. It's way righter than that. I've read posters from Texas on other sites that feel he's trashed the state with all the budget cuts while taking great pride in the whole tax-free thing. Any state that doesn't collect an income tax finds all sorts of ways to make up for it; fees, local property taxes, etc. Governing is about more than religion - if that's your sole basis for a claim to governing, something's wrong, IMHO. Especially if your religion regards all others who believe something different than your special version of Christianity are immoral, amoral, and not fit to hold office. BTW Sanity, Judaism states that the righteous (of any faith) have a place in the world to come.
|